Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Surg Endosc. 2002 Jul;16(7):1059-63. Epub 2002 Apr 9.

A comparative study of the short-term outcome following open and laparoscopic liver resection of colorectal metastases.

Author information

  • 1Interventional Centre/Surgical Department, National Hospital, The University of Oslo, 0027 Oslo, Norway. tom.mala@rikshospitalet.no

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Laparoscopic resection of liver tumors is feasible, but few studies have compared short-term outcome of the laparoscopic approach to that of a conventional technique.

METHODS:

Eighteen tumor resections performed during 14 procedures (14 patients) by conventional surgery were compared to 21 similar resections performed laparoscopically during 15 procedures (13 patients). All patients had colorectal liver metastases.

RESULTS:

No perioperative mortality occurred. Surgical time, peroperative bleeding and blood transfusion requirement were similar in the two groups. The resection margin was involved by tumor tissue in one specimen laparoscopically resected and in two specimens conventionally resected (p = 0.58). Patients operated laparoscopically remained in hospital for median 4 days, while patients operated conventionally stayed median 8.5 days (p <0.001). Patients operated laparoscopically required less opioid medication than patients having conventional surgery (median 1 vs 5 days; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Short-term outcome of laparoscopic liver resection compares to that of conventional surgery, with the additional benefits derived from minimal invasive therapy.

PMID:
12165823
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk