Evaluating the forecast accuracy and bias of alternative population projections for states

Int J Forecast. 1992 Nov;8(3):495-508. doi: 10.1016/0169-2070(92)90060-m.

Abstract

"A common perception among producers (and users) of population projections is that complex and/or sophisticated techniques produce more accurate forecasts than simple and/or naive techniques. In this paper we test the validity of that perception by evaluating the forecast accuracy and bias of eight commonly used projection techniques drawn from...four categories [trend extrapolation, ratio extrapolation, cohort-component, and structural]. Using data for [U.S.] state population projections from a number of different time periods, we find no evidence that complex and/or sophisticated techniques produce more accurate or less biased forecasts than simple, naive techniques."

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Americas
  • Bias*
  • Developed Countries
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic*
  • Forecasting*
  • Methods*
  • North America
  • Research
  • Research Design
  • Statistics as Topic
  • United States