Trends Biotechnol. 2002 Aug;20(8):357-8.

The history of the peer-review process.

Source

School of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK GU2 7XH. r.spier@surrey.ac.uk

Abstract

The peer-review process is a turf battle with the ultimate prize of the knowledge, science or doctrine being published. On the one side, we have the writers and originators of ideas, on the other, we have the editors and critics. But it was not always so.

PMID:: 12127284; [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Publication Types, MeSH Terms

Publication Types

Historical Article

MeSH Terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Other Literature Sources

Labome Researcher Resource - ExactAntigen/Labome

Supplemental Content

Save items

Related citations in PubMed

The genesis of modern science: contributions of scientific societies and scientific journals. [Radiology. 1998]
The genesis of modern science: contributions of scientific societies and scientific journals.
Siegelman SS. Radiology. 1998 Jul; 208(1):9-16.
[The history of the development of the medical press (1)]. [Feldsher Akush. 1991]
[The history of the development of the medical press (1)].
Velikoretskiĭ DA. Feldsher Akush. 1991 Oct; 56(10):39-43.
The evolution of the page. [AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012]
The evolution of the page.
Castillo M. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Aug; 33(7):1199-201. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
Review Historical and basic science review: past, present, and future of nerve repair. [J Reconstr Microsurg. 1997]
Review Historical and basic science review: past, present, and future of nerve repair.
Terzis JK, Sun DD, Thanos PK. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1997 Apr; 13(3):215-25.
Review Ideas about pain, a historical view. [Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007]
Review Ideas about pain, a historical view.
Perl ER. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Jan; 8(1):71-80.

See reviews... See all...

Cited by 6 PubMed Central articles

Great expectations. [J Clin Invest. 2012]
Great expectations.
Rockman HA. J Clin Invest. 2012 Apr 2; 122(4):1133. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
Review Industrial methodology for process verification in research (IMPROVER): toward systems biology verification. [Bioinformatics. 2012]
Review Industrial methodology for process verification in research (IMPROVER): toward systems biology verification.
Meyer P, Hoeng J, Rice JJ, Norel R, Sprengel J, Stolle K, Bonk T, Corthesy S, Royyuru A, Peitsch MC, et al. Bioinformatics. 2012 May 1; 28(9):1193-201. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
Alternatives to peer review: novel approaches for research evaluation. [Front Comput Neurosci. 2011]
Alternatives to peer review: novel approaches for research evaluation.
Birukou A, Wakeling JR, Bartolini C, Casati F, Marchese M, Mirylenka K, Osman N, Ragone A, Sierra C, Wassef A. Front Comput Neurosci. 2011; 5:56. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

See all...

Related information

Related Citations
Calculated set of PubMed citations closely related to the selected article(s) retrieved using a word weight algorithm. Related articles are displayed in ranked order from most to least relevant, with the “linked from” citation displayed first.
Cited in PMC
Full-text articles in the PubMed Central Database that cite the current articles.

Recent activity

Clear Turn Off Turn On

The history of the peer-review process.
The history of the peer-review process.
Trends Biotechnol. 2002 Aug ;20(8):357-8.

PubMed

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

PubMed

Result Filters

Display Settings:

Send to: