Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Eff Clin Pract. 2002 May-Jun;5(3):114-9.

Use and evaluation of critical pathways in hospitals.

Author information

  • 1Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. jodarer@jhsph.edu

Abstract

CONTEXT:

Although hospitals have devoted substantial resources to critical pathways, it is not known whether they routinely evaluate the clinical or economic effects of these pathways.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine how use and evaluation of critical pathways differ between academic and community hospitals.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional survey.

PARTICIPANTS:

Hospitals participating in consortia for improving quality of care associated with the Institute of Health Care Improvement and the VHA, Inc. (formerly known as the Voluntary Hospitals of America, Inc.). Hospital administrators at 41 hospitals completed the survey (71% response rate), representing 13 academic medical centers, 13 community teaching hospitals, and 15 community hospitals.

MEASURES:

Use of critical pathways and measurement of clinical and economic outcomes of pathways.

RESULTS:

The median number of adult critical pathways used by academic hospitals, community teaching hospitals, and community hospitals was 25, 18, and 3, respectively. The most common pathways were community-acquired pneumonia, total hip or knee replacement, and stroke or transient ischemic attack. The percentage of hospitals with pathways dedicating staff to manage them was 78% for academic hospitals, 22% for community teaching hospitals, and 14% for community hospitals (P = 0.02). Evaluation practices varied widely among hospitals with pathways. Measures assessed included monitoring length of stay (85%), total hospital costs (74%), in-hospital mortality (62%), infectious complications (53%), readmission rates (47%), functional status (18%), and adverse drug events (15%).

CONCLUSION:

The use of critical pathways varies substantially among hospitals participating in quality improvement consortia. Use was highest in academic centers and lowest in community hospitals. Many hospitals with pathways do not track important clinical outcomes as part of their evaluation practices.

PMID:
12088290
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk