Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Prog Transplant. 2001 Dec;11(4):291-7.

    The economics of kidney transplantation versus hemodialysis.

    Source

    Iona College, New Rochelle, NY, USA.

    Abstract

    Using 1998 data for 8 transplantation centers located in New York City, this study found that kidney transplantation was a more cost-effective treatment than hemodialysis for the Medicare program. The initially higher costs of transplantation were fully recouped by Medicare 2 years and 10 months after surgery. For persons who are eligible for Medicare solely due to their end-stage renal disease status, transplantation would generate average monthly savings of $3800 over dialysis for the 2 years following the break-even point. For those eligible for reasons other than end-stage renal disease, for example, the aged, the average savings would be $2400. The savings difference arises because Medicare coverage for immunosuppressants for the former group ends 36 months after transplantation.

    PMID:
    11871278
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for MetaPress.com

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk