Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jan 22;269(1487):137-42.

Inferring confidence sets of possibly misspecified gene trees.

Author information

  • 1Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK. korbinian.strimmer@zoo.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

The problem of inferring confidence sets of gene trees is discussed without assuming that the substitution model or the branching pattern of any of the investigated trees is correct. In this case, widely used methods to compare genealogies can give highly contradicting results. Here, three methods to infer confidence sets that are robust against model misspecification are compared, including a new approach based on estimating the confidence in a specific tree using expected-likelihood weights. The power of the investigated methods is studied by analysing HIV-1 and mtDNA sequence data as well as simulated sequences. Finally, guidelines for choosing an appropriate method to compare multiple gene trees are provided.

PMID:
11798428
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC1690879
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk