Display Settings:


Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Health Econ. 2001 Dec;10(8):775-8.

Methodological limitations of economic evaluations of antenatal screening.

Author information

  • National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. stavros.petrou@perinat.ox.ac.uk


A review of recent economic studies of antenatal screening reveals widespread violation of accepted economic evaluation methodology. In particular, the costs and benefits of antenatal screening are often misclassified and conflated, and the non-resource effects of averted costs are often excluded from the evaluation process. The result is a widespread violation of the explicit and systematic approaches taken by economic analysts more generally, and conclusions that may be described as misleading. This letter calls for economic analysts to be consistent in their application of economic evaluation methodology to antenatal screening programmes.

Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk