Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Eur J Cancer. 2001 Nov;37(17):2154-60.

Health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness studies in the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer and the US Prostate, Lung, Colon and Ovary trial.

Author information

  • 1Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. a.miller@dkfz-heidelberg.de

Abstract

Decisions on policies for screening for prostate cancer require that information upon health-related quality of life (HRQL) and cost-effectiveness (CE) be available, as the lead time for some of the cases detected by screening will be very long and detriments in quality of life could have a major impact on the subjects remaining life-span. A framework within which both HRQL and cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening can be assessed is presented. Studies of both are ongoing in the European Randomised Study of screening for prostate cancer and the US Prostate, Lung, Colon and Ovary trial. Preliminary information confirms that it is important to study screened subjects and controls, and not to assume that inferences derived from study of prostate cancer outside screening trials can be extrapolated to the trials. However, it will require prolonged study to enable the overall effects on quality of life, and on cost-effectiveness to be determined. Such studies are ongoing for the two trials.

PMID:
11677101
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk