Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Ir Med J. 2001 Jun;94(6):171-2.

How informed is consent? Use of an information booklet in patients undergoing total hip replacement.

Author information

  • 1Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Finglas, Dublin.

Abstract

For informed consent, patients must understand the risks and benefits of the proposed procedure. Fifty patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) participated in an evaluation of a newly devised information booklet. Patients' understanding of the risks and benefits of THR was assessed using a questionnaire before and after they had read the booklet. Pre-booklet patients knew on average 2 benefits of THR, compared with 3 afterwards. Twenty-two patients initially identified no alternative treatment to THR. Those who knew an alternative stated on average 1 treatment compared with 2 in the post-booklet group. Fifteen patients identified no risks of THR initially, compared with two after reading the booklet. Initially patients reported 1 risk, versus 3 after reading the booklet. Forty-eight patients thought that the booklet increased their understanding of THR and its risks. Fourteen found it upsetting, but acceptable. Forty-six patients wished to keep the booklet.

PMID:
11495233
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk