Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Arch Surg. 2001 Aug;136(8):933-6.

    Enteral vs parenteral nutrition after major abdominal surgery: an even match.

    Source

    Department of Digestive Surgery, Istituto di Clinica Chirurgica, Catholic University School of Medicine, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy. fpacelli@hotmail.com

    Abstract

    HYPOTHESIS:

    Immediate enteral feeding following major abdominal surgery reduces postoperative complications and mortality when compared with parenteral nutrition.

    DESIGN:

    A prospective multicenter randomized trial.

    SETTING:

    A university hospital department of digestive surgery.

    PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS:

    Two hundred forty-one malnourished patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to receive, after surgery, either enteral (enteral nutrition group: 119 patients) or parenteral nutrition (total parenteral nutrition group: 122 patients). The patients were monitored for postoperative complications and mortality.

    RESULTS:

    The rate of major postoperative complications was similar in the enteral and parenteral groups (enteral nutrition group: 37.8%; total parenteral nutrition group: 39.3%; P was not significant), as were the overall postoperative mortality rates (5.9% and 2.5%, respectively; P was not significant).

    CONCLUSION:

    The present study failed to demonstrate that enteral feeding following major abdominal surgery reduces postoperative complications and mortality when compared with parenteral nutrition.

    PMID:
    11485531
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk