Abstract

The authors sought to determine the following: (1) How rigorous are the current resource allocation methods used by Virginia's five regional Ryan White CARE (Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency) Act Title II consortia? (2) How useful are existing databases in allocating resources? (3) Is it feasible to introduce a standardized performance measurement approach for state-level assessment of consortia effectiveness? The authors reviewed proposals and progress reports from each of the consortia to the Virginia public health agency; they then visited each of the consortia to solicit information to refine the study questions and to review the consortia's databases. The authors reviewed the literature on existing models used to allocate resources, and surveyed members of the Virginia consortia about how they used various resource allocation tools, how effective these tools were, and how ready the consortia were to be evaluated regarding resource allocation. The authors found no uniform process for the allocation of Title II funds in Virginia. Consortia members who felt connected and involved with their consortium were significantly more knowledgeable about its operations and more likely to consider it effective. A consortium's use of a continuous quality improvement (CQI) approach to allocating resources was strongly associated with its members' perception that the consortium was effective. Statewide performance and/or outcome measures cannot be set without some standardized expectations for performance. To do this, some expectations for basic resource allocation procedures must be established. Three of Virginia's five consortia will make use of this study's instrumentation in their next resource allocation processes, and, if their experiences are useful, a statewide process may be established. If a statewide process is established, regional consortia must continue to be able to determine local needs and to respond with locally appropriate service planning.