Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM:

Occlusal adjustment therapy has been advocated as a treatment modality for temporomandibular disorders. In contrast to this position, a panel at the 1996 National Institute of Health technology assessment conference on TMD indicated that no clinical trials demonstrate that occlusal adjustment is superior to noninvasive therapies.

PURPOSE:

This article summarizes the published experimental studies on occlusal adjustments and temporomandibular disorders.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Eleven research experiments involving 413 subjects with either bruxism (n = 59), temporomandibular disorders (n = 219), headaches and temporomandibular disorders (n = 91), or chronic cervical pain (n = 40) were selected for critical review from the English dental literature.

RESULTS:

Three experiments evaluated the relationship between occlusal adjustment and bruxism. Six experiments evaluated occlusal adjustment therapy as a treatment for patients with primary temporomandibular disorders. One experiment looked at occlusal adjustment effect on headache/temporomandibular disorder symptoms; another looked at its effect on chronic neck pain. Most of these experiments used a mock adjustment or a comparison treatment as the control condition in adults who had an existing nonacute general temporomandibular disorder. Overall, the data from these experiments did not demonstrate elevated therapeutic efficacy for occlusal adjustment over the control or the contrasting therapy.

CONCLUSION:

The experimental evidence reviewed was neither convincing nor powerful enough to support the performance of occlusal therapy as a general method for treating a nonacute temporomandibular disorder, bruxism, or headache.