Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Am J Surg. 2001 May;181(5):450-3.

Comparison of carotid endarterectomy at high- and low-volume hospitals.

Author information

  • 1Foundation for Accountability, Oregon Health Science University, 9155 SW Barnes Rd, Suite 304, Portland, OR 97225, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Population-based studies have demonstrated better outcomes for carotid endarterectomies at high-volume hospitals.

METHODS:

This is a 2-year retrospective review of carotid procedures at two low-volume hospitals (n = 156) and one high-volume hospital (n = 404) in the metropolitan area of Portland, Oregon.

RESULTS:

There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality and stroke rates for carotid endarterectomies when comparing low- and high-volume hospitals (P = 0.59). These were comparable rates despite the fact that the low-volume hospitals had significantly older patients (P <0.001), more smokers (P <0.001), more patients with an indication of a previous nondisabling stroke (P <0.01), and fewer patients who were asymptomatic (P <0.01).

CONCLUSION:

The regionalization of carotid endarterectomy into high-volume hospitals is not justified by the findings of this study. Carotid endarterectomy performed by well-trained, experienced surgeons in low-volume hospitals is a safe procedure.

PMID:
11448441
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk