My NCBISign In

Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Am J Public Health. 2001 Jul;91(7):1114-6.

    On the wrong side of the tracts? Evaluating the accuracy of geocoding in public health research.

    Krieger N, Waterman P, Lemieux K, Zierler S, Hogan JW.

    Department of Health and Social Behavior, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA. nkrieger@hsph.harvard.edu

    OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the accuracy of geocoding for public health databases. METHODS: A test file of 70 addresses, 50 of which involved errors, was generated, and the file was geocoded to the census tract and block group levels by 4 commercial geocoding firms. Also, the "real world" accuracy of the best-performing firm was evaluated. RESULTS: Accuracy rates in regard to geocoding of the test file ranged from 44% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 32%, 56%) to 84% (95% CI = 73%, 92%). The geocoding firm identified as having the best accuracy rate correctly geocoded 96% of the addresses obtained from the public health databases. CONCLUSIONS: Public health studies involving geocoded databases should evaluate and report on methods used to verify accuracy.

    PMID: 11441740 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    PMCID: PMC1446703

    Supplemental Content

    Click here to read Click here to read
    Write to the Help Desk