Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Genome Res. 2001 May;11(5):817-32.

Evaluation of gene-finding programs on mammalian sequences.

Author information

  • 1Computer Science Department, The University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz 95064, USA. rogic@cse.ucsc.edu

Abstract

We present an independent comparative analysis of seven recently developed gene-finding programs: FGENES, GeneMark.hmm, Genie, Genescan, HMMgene, Morgan, and MZEF. For evaluation purposes we developed a new, thoroughly filtered, and biologically validated dataset of mammalian genomic sequences that does not overlap with the training sets of the programs analyzed. Our analysis shows that the new generation of programs has substantially better results than the programs analyzed in previous studies. The accuracy of the programs was also examined as a function of various sequence and prediction features, such as G + C content of the sequence, length and type of exons, signal type, and score of the exon prediction. This approach pinpoints the strengths and weaknesses of each individual program as well as those of computational gene-finding in general. The dataset used in this analysis (HMR195) as well as the tables with the complete results are available at http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~rogic/evaluation/.

PMID:
11337477
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC311133
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk