MLC phosphorylation and stress fiber contraction. MLC phosphorylation was detected by a urea gel system or autoradiography of SDS gels, and stress fiber contraction was monitored for each experimental condition under a phase–contrast microscope (+, contracted; −, not contracted). (a) Little or no phosphorylated MLC was present in freshly isolated model 1 stress fibers (lane 2). When model 1 stress fibers were treated with Mg-ATP in the presence of Ca2+, they contracted, and phosphorylated MLC could be detected (lane 3). Lane 1 is unphosphorylated chicken gizzard MLC. (b) Little or no phosphorylated MLC was present in model 2 stress fibers (lane 1). When model 2 stress fibers were treated with Mg-ATP in the presence (lane 2) or absence (lane 3) of Ca2+, they contracted, and MLC phosphorylated in both cases. (c) MLC phosphorylation in model 1 stress fibers was Ca2+-dependent and was inhibited by wortmannin. Model 1 stress fibers were incubated in radio-labeled ATP with (lane 1) or without (lane 2) Ca2+. The same samples shown in lanes l and 2 were pretreated with 10 μM wortmannin before the addition of radio-labeled ATP (lanes 3 and 4, respectively). The Ca2+-dependent MLC phosphorylation was inhibited by the MLCK inhibitor (lane 3). (d) MLC phosphorylation in model 2 stress fibers was independent of Ca2+ (lanes 1 and 2). The gel sample for each lane was treated in the same manner as the one shown in c. Wortmannin failed to inhibit MLC phosphorylation in model 2 (lanes 3 and 4). (e) Model 1 stress fibers were first incubated with 0 (lane 1), 0.005 (lane 2), 0.05 (lane 3), 0.51 (lane 4), or 5.1 (lane 5) μg/ml dominant-active Rho-kinase and then with radio-labeled ATP in the absence of Ca2+. Rho-kinase concentration–dependent phosphorylation was observed. (f) Model 2 stress fibers were incubated first with 0 (lanes 1 and 4), 1.0 (lanes 2 and 5), or 10 (lanes 3 and 6) μg/ml HA1077 and then with radio-labeled ATP in the absence (lanes 1–3) or presence (lanes 4–6) of Ca2+. Without Ca2+, Rho-kinase but not MLCK can phosphorylate MLC, and this phosphorylation was completely inhibited by 10 μg/ml HA1077 (lane 3). However, when Ca2+ is present, both Rho-kinase and MLCK can phosphorylate MLC and the Rho-kinase inhibitor cannot inhibit MLC phosphorylation (lanes 4–6). Model 1 stress fibers were first incubated with both 5.1 μg/ml dominant-active Rho-kinase and 0 (lane 7), 1.0 (lane 8), or 10 (lane 9) μg/ml HA1077 and then with radio-labeled ATP in the absence of Ca2+. Rho-kinase–dependent MLC phosphorylation is demonstrated. In all of these cases, stress fiber contraction was observed when MLC phosphorylation was unequivocally detected by autoradiography. (a and b) 20 μg of protein was loaded in each lane. (c–f) 10 μg of protein was loaded in each lane. (d) ±, the limited extent of contraction.