My NCBISign In

Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

    J Cardiovasc Risk. 2001 Apr;8(2):103-8.

    Cardiovascular risk factors: distribution and prevalence in a rural population of Bangladesh.

    Zaman MM, Yoshiike N, Rouf MA, Syeed MH, Khan MR, Haque S, Mahtab H, Tanaka H.

    National Center for Control of Rheumatic Fever and Heart Diseases, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh. mzaman@bangla.net

    BACKGROUND: Little is known about the cardiovascular risk factors in the Bangladeshi population. We examined 'classic' risk factors, including central obesity, in a rural population. METHODS: Non-biochemical variables were examined in 238 men and 272 women aged 18 years or more (mean +/- standard deviation 38.1 +/- 10.7 years in men and 36.0 +/- 9.8 in women). Fasting blood glucose and total cholesterol concentrations were determined in a sub-sample of 106 men and 135 women. RESULTS: Men and women had a similar body mass index (20.4 +/- 3.1 vs 20.8 +/- 3.4 kg/m2), waist circumference (72.8 +/- 7.6 vs 71.4 +/- 8.7 cm), systolic blood pressure (118.4 +/- 13.7 vs 119.5 +/- 17.7 mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (75.9 +/- 9.9 vs 74.6 +/- 11.5 mmHg), total cholesterol (155.7 +/- 36.0 vs 162.0 +/- 35.2 mg/dl) and blood glucose level (89.0 +/- 14.9 vs 86.2 +/- 9.6 mg/dl. After categorization of these variables, the prevalence of thinness (body mass index < 18.5; 30.0 vs 30.3%), obesity (body mass index > or = 30; 0.8 vs 1.1%), hypertension (systolic blood pressure > or = 140 and/or diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 or medication; 9.8 vs 15.6%), hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol > or = 240; 2.8 vs 3.0%) and diabetes mellitus (blood glucose > or = 126; 2.9 vs 0.7%) remained similar between the sexes. However, central obesity (waist circumference > or = 94 cm in men and > or = 80 cm in women) was less frequent (2.9 vs 16.8%; P = 0.001) in men. Overall, tobacco consumption (57.1 vs 23.2%; P = 0.001) and smoking (50.3% vs 2.9%; P = 0.001) were more frequent in men, but chewing tobacco consumption was similar (16.3 vs 21.4%; P = 0.095). CONCLUSIONS: Our sample size is small, and larger studies are necessary for a more accurate description of the risk factors.

    PMID: 11324369 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Supplemental Content

    Write to the Help Desk