Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Mar;52(3):342-6.

Opening pandora's box: the practical and legal dangers of involuntary outpatient commitment.

Author information

  • 1Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, Washington, DC 20005-5002, USA. michaela@bazelon.org

Abstract

Policy makers have recently begun to reconsider involuntary outpatient commitment as a means of enhancing public safety and providing mental health services to people deemed to be noncompliant with treatment. The authors review the therapeutic claims for outpatient commitment and take the position that there is insufficient evidence that it is effective. They offer arguments that outpatient commitment may not improve public safety and may not be more effective than voluntary services. The authors further point out that outpatient commitment may undermine the delivery of voluntary services and may drive consumers away from the mental health system. The authors conclude that outpatient commitment programs are vulnerable to legal challenge because they may depart from established constitutional standards for involuntary treatment.

Comment in

PMID:
11239102
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk