Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    BMJ. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):517-9.

    Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review.

    Source

    Clinical Risk Unit, Department of Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. c.vincent@ucl.ac.uk

    Erratum in

    • BMJ 2001 Jun 9;322(7299):1395.

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVES:

    To examine the feasibility of detecting adverse events through record review in British hospitals and to make preliminary estimates of the incidence and costs of adverse events.

    DESIGN:

    Retrospective review of 1014 medical and nursing records.

    SETTING:

    Two acute hospitals in Greater London area. Main outcome measure: Number of adverse events.

    RESULTS:

    110 (10.8%) patients experienced an adverse event, with an overall rate of adverse events of 11.7% when multiple adverse events were included. About half of these events were judged preventable with ordinary standards of care. A third of adverse events led to moderate or greater disability or death.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    These results suggest that adverse events are a serious source of harm to patients and a large drain on NHS resources. Some are major events; others are frequent, minor events that go unnoticed in routine clinical care but together have massive economic consequences.

    PMID:
    11230064
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC26554
    Free PMC Article

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for HighWire Press Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk