Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychol Res. 2000;64(2):81-92.

Subitizing and its subprocesses.

Author information

  • 1Fachbereich I, University of Trier, 54286 Trier, Germany. wender@cogpsy.uni-trier.de

Abstract

When people are presented with small sets of elements such as dots they can very easily determine their number. This ability has been called subitizing. The present paper reports results from four experiments. The discussion focuses on the question whether one or two psychological processes have to be assumed for this task of subitizing. Taken together our results support the two-process theories. In particular, a distinction between a process of separation and a process of enumeration is suggested. Experiments 3 and 4 support the canonical pattern hypothesis. Canonical patterns are processed substantially faster than noncanonical patterns. Furthermore, if a complex pattern can be broken down into small canonical patterns, then participants follow a partition and add strategy.

PMID:
11195308
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk