Comparison of epinephrine and vasopressin in a pediatric porcine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest

Crit Care Med. 2000 Dec;28(12):3777-83. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200012000-00001.

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to compare the effects of vasopressin vs. epinephrine vs. the combination of epinephrine with vasopressin on vital organ blood flow and return of spontaneous circulation in a pediatric porcine model of asphyxial arrest.

Design: Prospective, randomized laboratory investigation using an established porcine model for measurement of hemodynamic variables, organ blood flow, blood gases, and return of spontaneous circulation.

Setting: University hospital laboratory.

Subjects: Eighteen piglets weighing 8-11 kg.

Interventions: Asphyxial cardiac arrest was induced by clamping the endotracheal tube. After 8 mins of cardiac arrest and 8 mins of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a bolus dose of either 0.8 units/kg vasopressin (n = 6), 200 microg/kg epinephrine (n = 6), or a combination of 45 microg/kg epinephrine with 0.8 units/kg vasopressin (n = 6) was administered in a randomized manner. Defibrillation was attempted 6 mins after drug administration.

Measurements and main results: Mean +/- SEM coronary perfusion pressure, before and 2 mins after drug administration, was 13 +/- 2 and 23 +/- 6 mm Hg in the vasopressin group; 14 +/- 2 and 31 +/- 4 mm Hg in the epinephrine group; and 13 +/- 1 and 33 +/- 6 mm Hg in the epinephrine-vasopressin group, respectively (p = NS). At the same time points, mean +/- SEM left ventricular myocardial blood flow was 44 +/- 31 and 44 +/- 25 mL x min-(1) x 100 g(-1) in the vasopressin group; 30 +/- 18 and 233 +/- 61 mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1) in the epinephrine group; and 36 +/- 10 and 142 +/- 57 mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1) in the epinephrine-vasopressin group (p < .01 epinephrine vs. vasopressin; p < .02 epinephrine-vasopressin vs. vasopressin). Total cerebral blood flow trended toward higher values after epinephrine-vasopressin (60 +/- 19 mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1)) than after vasopressin (36 +/- 17 mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1)) or epinephrine alone (31 +/- 7 mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1); p = .07, respectively). One of six vasopressin, six of six epinephrine, and four of six epinephrine-vasopressin-treated animals had return of spontaneous circulation (p < .01, vasopressin vs. epinephrine).

Conclusions: Administration of epinephrine, either alone or in combination with vasopressin, significantly improved left ventricular myocardial blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Return of spontaneous circulation was significantly more likely in epinephrine-treated pigs than in animals resuscitated with vasopressin alone.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adrenergic Agonists / pharmacology
  • Adrenergic Agonists / therapeutic use*
  • Age Factors
  • Animals
  • Asphyxia / complications*
  • Blood Circulation / drug effects
  • Blood Gas Analysis
  • Cerebrovascular Circulation / drug effects
  • Coronary Circulation / drug effects
  • Disease Models, Animal*
  • Drug Evaluation, Preclinical
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Electric Countershock
  • Epinephrine / pharmacology
  • Epinephrine / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Heart Arrest / drug therapy*
  • Heart Arrest / etiology*
  • Heart Arrest / metabolism
  • Heart Arrest / physiopathology
  • Heart Ventricles / drug effects
  • Hemodynamics / drug effects
  • Random Allocation
  • Resuscitation / methods
  • Swine
  • Time Factors
  • Vasoconstrictor Agents / pharmacology
  • Vasoconstrictor Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Vasopressins / pharmacology
  • Vasopressins / therapeutic use*

Substances

  • Adrenergic Agonists
  • Vasoconstrictor Agents
  • Vasopressins
  • Epinephrine