Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Annu Rev Genet. 2000;34:479-497.

The SOS response: recent insights into umuDC-dependent mutagenesis and DNA damage tolerance.

Author information

  • 1Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.

Abstract

Be they prokaryotic or eukaryotic, organisms are exposed to a multitude of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damaging agents ranging from ultraviolet (UV) light to fungal metabolites, like Aflatoxin B1. Furthermore, DNA damaging agents, such as reactive oxygen species, can be produced by cells themselves as metabolic byproducts and intermediates. Together, these agents pose a constant threat to an organism's genome. As a result, organisms have evolved a number of vitally important mechanisms to repair DNA damage in a high fidelity manner. They have also evolved systems (cell cycle checkpoints) that delay the resumption of the cell cycle after DNA damage to allow more time for these accurate processes to occur. If a cell cannot repair DNA damage accurately, a mutagenic event may occur. Most bacteria, including Escherichia coli, have evolved a coordinated response to these challenges to the integrity of their genomes. In E. coli, this inducible system is termed the SOS response, and it controls both accurate and potentially mutagenic DNA repair functions [reviewed comprehensively in () and also in ()]. Recent advances have focused attention on the umuD(+)C(+)-dependent, translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) process that is responsible for SOS mutagenesis (). Here we discuss the SOS response of E. coli and concentrate in particular on the roles of the umuD(+)C(+) gene products in promoting cell survival after DNA damage via TLS and a primitive DNA damage checkpoint.

PMID:
11092836
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk