Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Br J Haematol. 2000 Oct;111(1):321-8.

Long-term outcome of acquired aplastic anaemia in children: comparison between immunosuppressive therapy and bone marrow transplantation.

Author information

  • 1Department of Developmental Paediatrics, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Japan. kojimas@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp

Abstract

A total of 100 children under the age of 17 years with acquired aplastic anaemia (AA) were initially treated with immunosuppressive therapy (IST) (n = 63) or bone marrow transplantation (BMT) (n = 37) from an HLA-matched family donor. The projected 10-year survival rates were 55 +/- 8% and 97 +/- 3% respectively (P = 0.004). Because the IST group included 11 non-responders who were salvaged by BMT from an HLA-matched unrelated donor, we compared failure-free survival (FFS) between the groups. The probability of FFS at 10 years was 97 +/- 3% for the BMT group, compared with 40 +/- 8% for the IST group (P = 0.0001). Seven patients evolved to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with monosomy 7 and the estimated cumulative incidence of MDS 10 years after diagnosis was 20 +/- 7% in the IST group. We compared the outcome of children treated with IST during the two consecutive periods of 1983-91 (group A, n = 40) and 1991-8 (group B, n = 23) to assess the impact of combined therapy with antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporin. The probability of FFS at 7 years follow-up was the same in the two groups (50 +/- 8% vs. 40 +/- 15%, P = 0.40). We recommend BMT as first-line therapy in paediatric severe AA patients with an HLA-matched family donor. Alternative donor BMT is recommended as salvage therapy in patients who relapse or do not respond to initial IST.

PMID:
11091219
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk