Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Lancet. 2000 Nov 4;356(9241):1554-9.

High-dose cyclophosphamide in severe aplastic anaemia: a randomised trial.

Author information

  • 1Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. johntis@intra.niddk.nih.gov

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

High-dose cyclophosphamide has been proposed as an alternative immunosuppressive agent for treatment of severe aplastic anaemia, with a response rate similar to that with regimens containing antithymocyte globulin (ATG) but neither relapse nor clonal haematological complications. We undertook a phase III, prospective, randomised trial to compare response rates to immunosuppression with either high-dose cyclophosphamide plus cyclosporin or conventional immunosuppression with ATG plus cyclosporin in previously untreated patients.

METHODS:

Between June, 1997, and March, 2000, 31 patients were enrolled. 15 were assigned cyclophosphamide (1 h intravenous infusion of 50 mg/kg daily for 4 days) and 16 were assigned ATG (40 mg/kg daily for 4 days); both groups received cyclosporin, initially at 12 mg/kg daily with adjustment to maintain concentrations at 200-400 microg/L, for 6 months. The primary endpoint was haematological response (no longer meeting criteria for severe aplastic anaemia). The trial was terminated prematurely after three early deaths in the cyclophosphamide group. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS:

Median follow-up was 21.9 months (range 1-33). There was excess morbidity in the cyclophosphamide group (invasive fungal infections, four cyclophosphamide vs no ATG patients; p=0.043) as well as excess early mortality (three deaths within the first 3 months cyclophosphamide vs no ATG patients; p=0.101). There was no significant difference at 6 months after treatment in the overall response rates among evaluable patients (six of 13 [46%] cyclophosphamide vs nine of 12 [75%] ATG).

INTERPRETATION:

A longer period of observation will be necessary to assess the secondary endpoints of relapse and late clonal complications as well as disease-free and overall survival. However, cyclophosphamide seems a dangerous choice for treatment of this disorder, given the good results achievable with standard therapy.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk