[Conflicting values in evaluation of psychiatric care--a review]

Lakartidningen. 2000 Aug 30;97(35):3758-61.
[Article in Swedish]

Abstract

Greater understanding is needed regarding psychiatric disorders and their causes, as well as the effects of psychiatric care. Ethical issues ought to be discussed in terms of both the choice of questions and to the ways in which data are collected. So far, most evaluations of psychiatric care have focused on medical utility, while issues of autonomy and impartiality are sorely lacking. An important challenge for the future is therefore to support the evolution of the search for knowledge into a multidisciplinary activity in which values concerning autonomy and impartiality are also incorporated.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Commitment of Mentally Ill
  • Ethics, Medical
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Humans
  • Informed Consent
  • Mental Disorders* / diagnosis
  • Mental Disorders* / therapy
  • Mental Health Services / standards*
  • Patient Advocacy
  • Psychiatry / standards*
  • Sweden