OBJECTIVE: We wished to investigate whether volume recruitment maneuvers (VRMs) could improve alveolar recruitment and oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients, ventilated at relatively low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). SETTING: General intensive care unit (ICU) located in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 15 PEEP responder ARDS patients undergoing continuous positive pressure ventilation (CPPV) with sedation and muscle paralysis. INTERVENTIONS: We identified a low (9.4 +/- 3 cmH2O) and a high (16.0 +/- 2 cmH2O) level of PEEP associated with target oxygenation values. Using a custom modified mechanical ventilator, we applied in random order three steps lasting 30 min: (1) CPPV at the low PEEP level (CPPV(LO)); (2) CPPV at the high PEEP level (CPPV(HI)); (3) CPPV at low PEEP with the superimposition of periodic VRMs (CPPV(VRM)). VRMs were performed twice a minute by increasing PEEP to the high level for two breaths. Each brace of two breaths was spaced 30 seconds from the preceding one. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We measured gas exchange, hemodynamics, respiratory mechanics, and the end expiratory lung volume (EELV). Compared to CPPV(LO), CPPV(VRM) resulted in higher PaO2 (117.9 +/- 40.6 vs 79.4 +/- 13.6 mmHg, P < 0.01) and EELV (1.50 +/- 0.62 vs 1.26 +/- 0.50 l, P < 0.05), and in lower venous admixture (Q(VA)/Q(T)) (0.42 +/- 0.07 vs 0.48 +/- 0.07, P < 0.01). During CPPV(HI), we observed significantly higher PaO2 (139.3 +/- 32.5 mmHg) and lower Q(VA)/Q(T) (0.37 +/- 0.08) compared to CPPV(LO) (P < 0.01) and to CPPV(VRM) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: VRMs can improve oxygenation and alveolar recruitment during CPPV at relatively low PEEP, but are relatively less effective than a continuous high PEEP level.