In response to the 1998 APA Division 40 Presidential Address: so where's the beef?

Clin Neuropsychol. 2000 May;14(2):202-11. doi: 10.1076/1385-4046(200005)14:2;1-Z;FT202.

Abstract

During the 1998 Division 40 presidential address by Linas Bieliauskas in San Francisco, several assertions were made contending that professional schools of psychology (PSP) had a deleterious effect on clinical neuropsychology by lowering professional standards, removing science from the curriculum, and producing mediocre clinicians. Bieliauskas reported to the author that he had based his opinion, in part, on data indicating that Boulder model graduates attained superior mean scores on the Examination for the Professional Practice in Psychology (EPPP) as compared to their Vail model counterparts. In order to determine whether significant differences existed between the two groups, a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted using the 1997 EPPP scores reported by the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards (ASPPB, 1997). The author also provides a response to Bieliauskas' (1998) assertions.

MeSH terms

  • Analysis of Variance
  • Certification* / standards
  • Certification* / statistics & numerical data
  • Curriculum
  • Humans
  • Interprofessional Relations*
  • Models, Educational*
  • Neuropsychology / organization & administration
  • Neuropsychology / standards*
  • Psychology / education*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Societies, Scientific*
  • United States
  • Universities / statistics & numerical data