Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Forensic Sci Int. 2000 Jul 24;112(1):17-40.

An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA.

Author information

  • 1Forensic Science Service, Priory House, Gooch Street North, B56QQ, Birmingham, UK. dnapgill@compuserve.com

Abstract

By increasing the PCR amplification regime to 34 cycles, we have demonstrated that it is possible routinely to analyse <100 pg DNA. The success rate was not improved (without impairing quality) by increasing cycle number further. Compared to amplification of 1 ng DNA at 28 cycles, it was shown that increased imbalance of heterozygotes occurred, along with an increase in the size (peak area) of stutters. The analysis of mixtures by peak area measurement becomes increasingly difficult as the sample size is reduced. Laboratory-based contamination cannot be completely avoided, even when analysis is carried out under stringent conditions of cleanliness. A set of guidelines that utilises duplication of results to interpret profiles originating from picogram levels of DNA is introduced. We demonstrate that the duplication guideline is robust by applying a statistical theory that models three key parameters - namely the incidence of allele drop-out, laboratory contamination and stutter. The advantage of the model is that the critical levels for each parameter can be calculated. This information may be used (for example) to determine levels of contamination that can be tolerated within the strategy employed. In addition we demonstrate that interpreting one banded loci, where allele dropout could have occurred, using LR=1/2f(a) was conservative provided that the band was low in peak area. Furthermore, we demonstrate that an apparent mis-match between crime-stain and a suspect DNA profile does not necessarily result in an exclusion. The method used is complex, yet can be converted into an expert system. We envisage this to be the next step.

PMID:
10882828
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk