Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jun;182(6):1355-62.

The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona, 1997.

Author information

  • 1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

This study was undertaken to describe labor induction risk factors and consequences among women with term singleton gestations with vertex presentation.

STUDY DESIGN:

Arizona births in 1997 (N = 65,607) were studied by means of stratified analysis and logistic regression.

RESULTS:

Labor induction occurred in 20.3% (n = 13,288). Labor induction risk factors were as follows: race or ethnicity (white non-Hispanic 25.3%; Hispanic, 13.9%; foreign-born Hispanic, 10.3%; and US-born Hispanic, 18.5%), education (<12 years, 14.1%; >12 years, 24.6%), payor (private insurance, 24.5%; Medicaid, 16.7%), hospital type (government controlled, 13.7%; investor owned, 30.5%). Race or ethnicity and hospital type remained important determinants of labor induction in the multivariate analysis. Relative risks of cesarean delivery with labor induction were as follows: nulliparous, 1.38; parous with no previous cesarean delivery, 1.00; and parous with previous cesarean delivery, 0.50.

CONCLUSION:

Large variations in labor induction were noted across maternal ethnicity and hospital type categories. Labor induction increased cesarean delivery rates among nulliparous women, whereas no increase was seen among parous women with no previous cesarean delivery. Labor induction was used less often among those with previous cesarean delivery; when it was used in this group, however, it was associated with a lower cesarean delivery rate.

PMID:
10871449
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk