Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Urol Res. 2000 Apr;28(2):136-40.

Effects of phytate and pyrophosphate on brushite and hydroxyapatite crystallization. Comparison with the action of other polyphosphates.

Author information

  • 1Laboratory of Urolithiasis Research, Faculty of Sciences, University of Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. dqufgf0@ps.uib.es

Abstract

This is a comparative study of the effects of phytate and pyrophosphate and other polyphosphates on the crystallization of hydroxyapatite and brushite, the most frequent calcium phosphates involved in calcium oxalate urolithiasis. Brushite and hydroxyapatite crystal formation was studied in synthetic urine, through kinetic-turbidimetric measurements that allowed evaluation of the inhibitory effects on crystallization of insoluble salts. The effectiveness in preventing brushite crystallization decreases in the sequence phytate > polyphosphate > EDTPO > etidronate > pyrophosphate > triphosphate > medronate; whereas the order of effectiveness in preventing hydroxyapatite crystallization was EDTPO > etidronate = pyrophosphate > triphosphate > medronate > polyphosphate > phytate. Phytate, a natural inhibitor in urine, most effectively blocked brushite precipitation (1.21x10(-5) M prevented crystallization during time periods of at least 1 h), and pyrophosphate was the natural inhibitor that most effectively blocked hydroxyapatite precipitation (2.87x10(-6) M prevented crystallization during time periods of at least 1 h). This demonstrates that low excretion of these substances would pose a risk of renal lithiasis.

PMID:
10850638
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk