Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The clinical and research importance of tolerance and/or withdrawal in the diagnosis of substance dependence has been identified as a key area needing clarification. Earlier longitudinal studies did not identify whether diagnoses of alcohol dependence were current or lifetime. In this study, the prognostic significance of the DSM-IV physiological specifier was investigated among cases of alcohol dependence current at the baseline interview. The role of tremors, required in DSM-III and DSM-III-R, was investigated as well.

METHOD:

Household residents (N = 130; 57% men) meeting full criteria for current DSM-IV alcohol dependence in a baseline interview were re-interviewed a year later and DSM-IV alcohol dependence was again evaluated. Reliable structured interviews were used to make the diagnoses. The DSM-IV physiologic specifier and its components were tested as predictors of outcome of DSM-IV alcohol dependence, and included an additional definition of alcohol withdrawal that required tremors. Chi-square tests and adjusted odds ratios indicated statistical significance of group differences on outcome.

RESULTS:

The DSM-IV physiological specifier (tolerance or withdrawal) did not predict 1-year chronicity of DSM-IV alcohol dependence, nor did tolerance when considered separately. However, withdrawal predicted poor outcome (e.g., 1-year chronicity of DSM-IV alcohol dependence). The effect of withdrawal was strengthened when tremors were required as part of the withdrawal syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS:

In contrast to earlier longitudinal research, this study supports the prognostic relevance of one component of the present DSM-IV physiological specifier--withdrawal. Withdrawal appears to have stronger prognostic meaning when the DSM-III-R version, in which tremors were required, is used. Further studies of the physiological subtype may benefit from studying subjects who have been clearly identified at the baseline evaluation as having a current diagnosis of dependence.