Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Chest. 2000 Feb;117(2):467-75.

    The effect of respiratory therapist-initiated treatment protocols on patient outcomes and resource utilization.

    Kollef MH, Shapiro SD, Clinkscale D, Cracchiolo L, Clayton D, Wilner R, Hossin L.

    Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. mkollef@pulmonary.wustl.edu

    CONTEXT: Physicians frequently prescribe respiratory treatments to hospitalized patients, but the influence of such treatments on clinical outcomes is difficult to assess. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients receiving respiratory treatments managed by respiratory care practitioner (RCP)-directed treatment protocols or physician-directed orders. DESIGN: A single center, quasi-randomized, clinical study. SETTING: Three internal medicine firms from an urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Six hundred ninety-four consecutive hospitalized non-ICU patients ordered to receive respiratory treatments. Main outcome measures: Discordant respiratory care orders, respiratory care charges, hospital length of stay, and patient-specific complications. Discordant orders were defined as written orders for respiratory treatments that were not clinically indicated as well as orders omitting treatments that were clinically indicated according to protocol-based treatment algorithms. RESULTS: Firm A patients (n = 239) received RCP-directed treatments and had a statistically lower rate of discordant respiratory care orders (24.3%) as compared with patients receiving physician-directed treatments in firms B (n = 205; 58.5%) and C (n = 250; 56.8%; p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in patient complications were observed. The average number of respiratory treatments and respiratory care charges were statistically less for firm A patients (10.7 +/- 13.7 treatments; $868 +/- 1,519) as compared with patients in firms B (12.4 +/- 12.7 treatments, $1,124 +/- 1,339) and C (12.3 +/- 13.4 treatments, $1, 054 +/- 1,346; p = 0.009 [treatments] and p < 0.001 [respiratory care charges]). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory care managed by RCP-directed treatment protocols for non-ICU patients is safe and showed greater agreement with institutional treatment algorithms as compared with physician-directed respiratory care. Additionally, the overall utilization of respiratory treatments was significantly less among patients receiving RCP-directed respiratory care.

    PMID: 10669692 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Supplemental Content

    Click here to read