Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Nov;5(11):3653-60.

The outcome of heregulin-induced activation of ovarian cancer cells depends on the relative levels of HER-2 and HER-3 expression.

Author information

  • 1Division of Medicine, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, USA.

Abstract

Members of the epidermal growth factor receptor family of tyrosine kinases, including epidermal growth factor receptor, c-erbB-2 (HER-2), c-erbB-3 (HER-3), and c-erbB-4 (HER-4), can be coexpressed at different levels in nonhematopoietic tissues. Amplification and overexpression of HER-2 is found in approximately one-third of cancers that arise in the breast and ovary. In our previous studies, heregulin (HRG) and anti-HER-2 antibodies inhibited proliferation, increased invasiveness, and enhanced tyrosine autophosphorylation of SKBr3 breast cancer cells that overexpressed HER-2. In the present report, the effects of HRG and anti-HER-2 antibody have been compared in six ovarian cancer cell lines. HRG inhibited anchorage-independent growth of SKOv3 cells that overexpressed HER-2 (10(5) receptors/cell) but stimulated the growth of OVCA420, OVCA429, OVCA432, OVCA433, and OVCAR-3 cells that expressed lower levels of the receptor (10(4) receptors/cell). Thus, cell lines with a high level of HER-2 relative to HER-3 or HER-4 were growth inhibited, whereas cell lines with lower levels of HER-2 were growth stimulated by HRG. Stimulation or inhibition of clonogenic growth did not correlate with endogenous expression of HRG or with the impact of exogenous HRG on phosphorylation of HER-2, HER-3, or HER-4. Anti-HER-2 antibodies inhibited the growth of SKOv3 cells but failed to affect the growth of the other cell lines. In OVCAR-3 cells that had been transfected with HER-2 cDNA to increase expression to 10(5) receptors/cell, HRG inhibited rather than stimulated growth. Conversely, when HER-2 expression by SKOv3 cells was downregulated by transfection of the viral E1A gene, HRG stimulated rather than inhibited growth. To evaluate the relative importance of HER-3 and HER-4, NIH 3T3 cells were cotransfected with HER-2 and HER-3 or with HER-2 and HER-4. HRG inhibited the growth of cells with a high ratio of HER-2:HER-3, whereas HRG stimulated the growth of cells with low levels of the two receptors. In cells that express only HER-2 and HER-4, HRG stimulated the growth of cells that expressed HER-4 independent of HER-2 levels. Anti-HER-2 antibodies inhibited the growth of transfectants with high levels of HER-2 expression independent of HER-3 or HER-4 expression. In ovarian cancer cells that express all three receptors, the relative levels of HER-2 and HER-3 appear to determine the response to HRG. Taken together, these studies support the concept that the level of HER-2 expression can modulate response to HRG, determining whether the response is stimulatory or inhibitory. In contrast, agonistic antibodies that bind to HER-2 alone inhibit anchorage-independent growth but fail to mimic HRG's ability to stimulate growth of cells with low HER-2: HER-3 ratios.

PMID:
10589783
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk