Abstract

In recent years there has been a dramatic increase in research dedicated to the psycho-behavioural modulation of immune function, i.e. the field of Psychoneuroimmunology (PNI). This has led, necessarily, to the use of several in vitro and in vivo techniques in attempts to delineate the relationship between these two phenomena. However, since the field's inception, considerable uncertainty has existed over the significance of the immune outcomes detected and this has been compounded by the equivocal nature of some of the published data. A great deal of this uncertainty could, however, be overcome if a clearer understanding was achieved on the advantages and limitations conferred by the manifold immune assays described in the literature. This would, in turn, encourage their more appropriate use within PNI. Hence, in this review we describe the rationale behind, and offer an evaluation of, some of the more frequently used in vitro and in vivo immunological and virological techniques. We hope that a clear understanding of the rationale behind such assays and their inherent advantages and limitations will inform the discussion of the significance of stress-related immune impairment.