pICln inhibits Sm binding to U RNA. (a) Oocytes were injected with buffer, GST, or GST-xICln, followed by a mixture of 32P-labeled U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 RNA. The oocytes were then homogenized, and Sm-associated U RNA was immunoprecipitated with the anti-Sm antibody Y12. The immunoprecipitate and supernatant were deproteinized and analyzed on a denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Each sample represents a pool of four oocytes. Ctrl indicates the mixture of U RNAs prior to injection. The different amounts of each U RNA reflect different amounts of U RNA produced from each template in in vitro transcription reactions. (b) Quantitation of the results of panel a. The amount of U RNA present in the immunoprecipitate and supernatant was quantitated by measuring radioactivity in gels on a phosphorimager. The percentage of U RNA found in the precipitate of pICln-injected oocytes was plotted relative to the percentage of U RNA in the precipitate in the buffer-injected control oocytes. •, significant inhibition due to GST-xICln injection compared to buffer or GST controls (P < 0.03). Each column represents the average (error bar, standard error of the mean) for five (GST) or six (buffer, GST-xICln) samples. (c) Bandshift analysis of Sm binding to U RNA. Oocytes were injected with GST (G) or GST-xICln (I) and subsequently injected with either 32P-labeled U1 (1), U5 (5), or U1Δ (Δ), a U1 mutant that lacks the Sm binding site. The oocytes were homogenized, and either buffer, anti-Sm antibody, or anti-pICln antibody was added. An aliquot was analyzed by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (top panel). RNA was recovered from another aliquot of the same bandshift reaction mixture and analyzed by denaturing gel electrophoresis (bottom panel). The square bracket indicates U RNA with reduced mobility due to protein binding. The arrow indicates complexes with very low mobility due to antibody binding. The positions of free U1, U5, and U1Δ probes are shown.