Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Trends Neurosci. 1999 Feb;22(2):51-61.

Stereological methods for estimating the total number of neurons and synapses: issues of precision and bias.

Author information

  • 1Dept of Neurobiology, Institute of Anatomy, University of Aarhus, Denmark.

Abstract

The emergence of a new generation of stereological techniques for counting objects in histological sections has prompted a debate about whether or not these methods are better than previously available techniques when they are used to make estimates of the total numbers of neurons and synapses in a neural structure. During this debate, the concepts of an unbiased estimate and that of a precise estimate have often been confused. A full understanding of the distinction between these two separate aspects of an estimate is required in order to be able to appreciate the virtues of these new counting methods and to apply them correctly. This review intends to make the fundamental issues of this debate more clear, and describes (1) the fundamental differences between the newer design-based counting techniques and previously available assumption-based techniques, and (2) the distinction between an unbiased estimate and a precise estimate.

Comment in

PMID:
10092043
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk