Anthropoid origins and the modern symphysis

Folia Primatol (Basel). 1999 Mar-Apr;70(2):65-78. doi: 10.1159/000021678.

Abstract

To highlight adaptive transformations in craniomandibular form during anthropoid origins, symphyseal character states and underlying masticatory loading regimes were investigated vis-à-vis shifts in diet and body size. A study of fossil anthropoids is possible because variation in symphyseal fusion is continuous and directly proportional to the amount of symphyseal stress and because such variation can be considered a series of discrete character states each with unique functional underpinnings. Using recent systematic renderings of Eocene and Oligocene taxa as a template with which to assess character evolution, this analysis indicates when, and in which clade(s), specific masticatory features became fixed and thus diagnostic. A general trend throughout early anthropoid evolution is for descendent taxa to be progressively larger than ancestral forms. Coupled with this pattern is the tendency for larger-bodied fossil anthropoids to have ingested tougher diets variably consisting of thick-coated, unripe fruits and/or leaves. Mastication of mechanically tougher foods entails greater repetitive loading of the mandible and requires relatively larger amounts of balancing-side muscle force, thus resulting in correspondingly greater symphyseal fusion due to elevated dorsoventral shear. With a single exception, these adaptive transformations characterize the evolutionary pathway leading both to parapithecines and a catarrhine:platyrrhine clade (crown anthropoids). While the ancestor of crown anthropoids would have possessed a body size, diet and masticatory adaptations similar to parapithecines, such a common suite of features evolved independently. Moreover, the evolution of an early-fusing symphysis and associated wishboning loading regime of catarrhines and platyrrhines is unique among all anthropoids. Lastly, the apparent lack of reversals in symphyseal fusion indicates the improbability of phylogenetic hypotheses in which a relationship is proposed between 'ancestral' taxa with a greater degree of symphyseal fusion and 'descendent' anthropoids with a lesser degree of ossification.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biological Evolution
  • Chin / anatomy & histology*
  • Haplorhini / anatomy & histology*