Effect of CaM-KII on affinity and voltage-dependence of GluR1. (A) Dose–response curves for GluR1 with (squares; n = 4) and without (circles; n = 4) coexpressed CaM-KII. Currents were normalized to those evoked by 10 mM glutamate. (Insert) Whole-cell currents elicited at −80 mV by 10 μM to 30 mM glutamate for GluR1 expressed alone. (B and C Upper) Whole-cell (B) and outside-out patch (C) currents for GluR1 alone elicited by 100-ms pulses of 10 mM glutamate at membrane potentials from −100 mV to 120 mV (20-mV steps). (B and C Lower) Voltage-dependence of whole-cell (B) and outside-out patch (C) currents for GluR1 alone (circles) or for GluR1 coexpressed with CaM-KII (squares). (D) Rectification index for whole-cell (open bars) and outside-out patch (gray bars) currents for GluR1 expressed alone, for GluR1 coexpressed with CaM-KII, for GluR1 with HI CaM-KII infused in the patch pipette, and for Ser-831-to-Glu and Ser-831-to-Asp mutants.

Effect of CaM-KII on the desensitization of GluR1. (A and B) Whole-cell (A) and outside-out patch (B) currents elicited by 10 mM glutamate at −80 mV in cells expressing GluR1 alone (Left) or the Ser-831-to-Glu mutant (Right). The currents were fitted by the sum of two exponentials for the rise and decay shown by the thin line. (C) τ_des as a function of glutamate concentration for the whole-cell currents (n = 4). (D) τ_des for whole-cell (open bars) and outside-out (gray bars) currents for GluR1 expressed alone, for GluR1 coexpressed with CaM-KII, for GluR1 with HI CaM-KII in the patch pipette, and for Ser-831-to-Glu and Ser-831-to-Asp mutants. (E) Time course of recovery from desensitization measured as the amplitude ratio of the second current to the first in pairs of glutamate applications. Points were fitted by exponential (solid line) with the time constant τ_rec. (Insert) Currents elicited by paired applications of 10 mM glutamate (20-ms pulses) with time intervals 10–1,000 ms after the end of the first application. (F) τ_rec for cells with GluR1 alone, for cells with GluR1 and CaM-KII, and for Ser-831-to-Glu and Ser-831-to-Asp mutants.

CaM-KII increased channel conductance. (A and B Left) Nine currents (downward) elicited by repetitive applications of 10 mM glutamate (70-ms pulses; 4-s time intervals) in outside-out patches when GluR1 was expressed alone (A, −90 mV) or with activated CaM-KII in the patch pipette (B, −100 mV). The outward currents shown are mean currents for 37 trials (A) and 83 trials (B). (A and B Right) The variance of the current fluctuations as a function of the mean currents shown in A and B Left. Solid lines are fitting curves with the indicated parameters. (C Left) Two current traces from the patch shown in B, when single-channel currents were resolved on the tails of macroscopic currents. (C Right) All-point histogram for traces shown in C Left, taken after the decay of macroscopic current. The arrow indicates the value of single-channel current (2.1 pA), determined by the variance analyses. (D) Channel conductance (Left) and P_o (Right), determined by variance analyses when the GluR1 receptor was expressed alone (R1), when the GluR1 receptor was coexpressed with CaM-KII (R1+CamKII), with HI CaM-KII in the patch pipette (R1+HI CaMKII), and of the mutants Ser-831 to Glu and Ser-831 to Asp. ∗∗, P < 0.01.

CaM-KII increased the contribution of high-conductance states in single-channel activity. Single-channel recordings (Top), distribution of channel conductances (Middle), and channel openings (Bottom) were obtained from cells expressing GluR1 alone (A), from cells expressing GluR1 coexpressed with CaM-KII (B), or from the Ser-831-to-Asp mutant (C). For single-channel recordings, eight traces every 100 ms were superimposed, recorded at membrane potentials of −101 mV (A), −128 mV (B), and −125 mV (C). For comparison, currents in A–C were scaled by conductance and show the same four conductance states in all situations. Note the different scales for the same calibration of 1 pA in A–C. Each conductance histogram was fitted by the sum of four Gaussian functions (smooth curves), which are shown individually by dotted lines. Their mean values were, for A, 9.3 pS (contribution of 26.8%), 13.5 pS (56.8%), 22.2 pS (12.4%), and 27.3 pS (4%); for B, 8.6 pS (23.7%), 14.1 pS (30.3%), 23.1 pS (24%), and 27.1 (22%); and, for C, 9.6 pS (0.8%), 13.1 pS (13.7%), 21.3 pS (57.5%), and 26.1 pS (28%). Calculated weighted single-channel conductances were 13.8 pS (A), 17.9 pS (B), and 21.4 pS (C). Each distribution of open times was fitted by the sum of two exponentials with time constants of 0.24 ms (contribution of 73%) and 2.4 ms (A), 0.36 ms (71%) and 2.4 ms (B), and 0.29 ms (52%) and 2.5 ms (C).