U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Display Settings:

Items per page

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 7

1.
Figure 6

Figure 6. From: Scanning X-ray nanodiffraction: from the experimental approach towards spatially resolved scattering simulations.

SiGe(004) reflection acquired in a nanodiffraction experiment on SiGe/Si(001) DMs. The 2D detector frame shows the crystal truncation rod (CTR) of the (001) surface and the diffuse intensity with positional correlation peaks around the SiGe(004) reflection (SiGe).

Martin Dubslaff, et al. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2012;7(1):553-553.
2.
Figure 5

Figure 5. From: Scanning X-ray nanodiffraction: from the experimental approach towards spatially resolved scattering simulations.

Internal displacement field and simulated beam path within SiGe DMs.(a) depicts the x-component of the internal displacement field within SiGe DMs and the Si substrate. (b) shows the output of the weighting values wnfor each scatterer n of the material in our model.

Martin Dubslaff, et al. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2012;7(1):553-553.
3.
Figure 7

Figure 7. From: Scanning X-ray nanodiffraction: from the experimental approach towards spatially resolved scattering simulations.

Displacement field within InGaAs QDMs and related X-ray nanodiffraction simulation.(a) shows the vertical slice through the x-component of the displacement field within In0.3Ga0.7As/GaAs QDMs calculated by FEM and the corresponding scattering simulation near the GaAs(004) and InGaAs(004) reflections. (b) shows a comparable slice like that of (a) but after removing all 3D data of the InGaAs QDMs directly before running the scattering simulations shown below. The FEM strain field calculations have been performed before cropping the model data.

Martin Dubslaff, et al. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2012;7(1):553-553.
4.
Figure 4

Figure 4. From: Scanning X-ray nanodiffraction: from the experimental approach towards spatially resolved scattering simulations.

X-ray nanospot simulation of a scan over a SiGe DMs.(a) shows the beam spot positions given by the weighting factors wnwithin the plane of the modelled sample surface. The SiGe dots (red) grown around a pit (grey) are also sketched within (a). Weighting factors wnmultiplied by the y-component of the internal displacement field are shown in (b) and reveal the parts of the displacement field that are contributing to the simulation. (c) shows the simulated diffraction image near SiGe(004) reflection at the corresponding spot position shown in (a).

Martin Dubslaff, et al. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2012;7(1):553-553.
5.
Figure 2

Figure 2. From: Scanning X-ray nanodiffraction: from the experimental approach towards spatially resolved scattering simulations.

X-ray beam focused by nanofocusing lenses.(a) shows the illumination function of an X-ray beam which has been obtained by X-ray ptychography prior to a nanofocus diffraction experiment []. The image of the illumination function depicts a cross section of the amplitude and phase within the focal plane of the beam and, thus, determines the final spot profile at the sample surface. HA and VA indicate side oscillations due to the lens apertures. (b) is a projection of the intensity distribution of the illumination function to the horizontal axis (dotted line in (a)).

Martin Dubslaff, et al. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2012;7(1):553-553.
6.
Figure 3

Figure 3. From: Scanning X-ray nanodiffraction: from the experimental approach towards spatially resolved scattering simulations.

X-ray nanospot simulation of a scan over a SiGe island.(a) shows the spot position images, represented by the weighting values wn, whereas in (b), the product of wnwith the y-component of the internal displacement field is depicted (see text for explanation). (c) shows the corresponding RSM simulations near SiGe(004) and the comparison with experimental results (d). The Si substrate reflection has been blocked by a beam stop. Individually excited crystal truncation rods of SiGe(111) side facets can be seen in simulation (c) and measurement (d).

Martin Dubslaff, et al. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2012;7(1):553-553.
7.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: Scanning X-ray nanodiffraction: from the experimental approach towards spatially resolved scattering simulations.

Sketch of the geometrical situation and variable definitions.p1,p2are the beam profile pixel coordinates; α1and α2are the beam incidence and exit angles with related azimuth angles βand γ. d1,d2are the detector pixel coordinates, and r0=(x0), y0, z0) is the reference point of the spot center at the sample surface (a). A 2D sketch of the situation in reciprocal space for the (004) reflection is shown in (b). Therein, k1, k2are the wave vectors, q is the scattering vector, and the 2D detector (blue line) stands orthogonally to the sketch (which is the [] direction).

Martin Dubslaff, et al. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2012;7(1):553-553.

Display Settings:

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center