U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 4

1.
Figure 2

Figure 2. From: Right Anterior Cingulate Cortical Thickness and Bilateral Striatal Volume Correlate with CBCL Aggressive Behavior Scores in Healthy Children.

Scatterplots of CBCL Aggressive Behavior raw scores against local cortical thickness (mm).
Controlled for age, gender, scanner and total brain volume.

Simon Ducharme, et al. Biol Psychiatry. ;70(3):283-290.
2.
Figure 4

Figure 4. From: Right Anterior Cingulate Cortical Thickness and Bilateral Striatal Volume Correlate with CBCL Aggressive Behavior Scores in Healthy Children.

Scatterplots of CBCL Aggressive Behavior raw scores against the left and right striatum volume (mm3)
Controlled for age, gender, scanner and total brain volume.

Simon Ducharme, et al. Biol Psychiatry. ;70(3):283-290.
3.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: Right Anterior Cingulate Cortical Thickness and Bilateral Striatal Volume Correlate with CBCL Aggressive Behavior Scores in Healthy Children.

Brain areas where local cortical thickness is associated with CBCL Aggressive Behavior raw scores in a second-order (quadratic) model over the whole sample (n=193). Random field theory was used to correct for multiple comparisons over the whole cortical mantle.
Figure is shown at p≤0.05, RFT corrected. Blue areas are significant at the cluster level and red color corresponds to areas significant at the vertex level (none in this figure). Controlled for age, gender, scanner and total brain volume.

Simon Ducharme, et al. Biol Psychiatry. ;70(3):283-290.
4.
Figure 3

Figure 3. From: Right Anterior Cingulate Cortical Thickness and Bilateral Striatal Volume Correlate with CBCL Aggressive Behavior Scores in Healthy Children.

Brain areas where local cortical thickness is associated with the ‘CBCL Aggressive Behavior by gender’ interaction term (contrast females – males) over the whole sample (n=193). A first-order linear model was used. Threshold for trends was set at p=0.005 uncorrected for regions of interest (ACC/OFC).
Figure is shown at p≤0.005, uncorrected. This figure includes only one-sided associations because trends in the regions of interest were all in the same direction. Associations outside of the regions of interest were not significant after a random field theory correction. Controlled for age, gender, scanner and total brain volume.

Simon Ducharme, et al. Biol Psychiatry. ;70(3):283-290.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center