U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Display Settings:

Items per page

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 13

1.
Fig. 12

Fig. 12. From: Loss of teeth and enamel in tetrapods: fossil record, genetic data and morphological adaptations.

Tooth developing in the nine-banded armadillo. Note the presence of a thin layer of enamel covering the orthodentine crown. Modified after .

Tiphaine Davit-Béal, et al. J Anat. 2009 Apr;214(4):477-501.
2.
Fig. 4

Fig. 4. From: Loss of teeth and enamel in tetrapods: fossil record, genetic data and morphological adaptations.

Simplified phylogeny of Batracia (after ). Red line: edentate toad lineage. It is worth noting that several species in various anuran lineages have also lost the ability to form teeth independently (not shown). †Extinct lineage.

Tiphaine Davit-Béal, et al. J Anat. 2009 Apr;214(4):477-501.
3.
Fig. 1

Fig. 1. From: Loss of teeth and enamel in tetrapods: fossil record, genetic data and morphological adaptations.

Simplified tetrapodan phylogeny with indication of toothless lineages (red lines), enamel-less lineages (blue lines) and lineages with enamel reduction and tooth reduction (green lines). Tetrapodan relationships after and .

Tiphaine Davit-Béal, et al. J Anat. 2009 Apr;214(4):477-501.
4.
Fig. 2

Fig. 2. From: Loss of teeth and enamel in tetrapods: fossil record, genetic data and morphological adaptations.

Simplified phylogeny of Avialae (after ). Lineages with toothless taxa are in red. (A) Skull of Velociraptor. (B) Skull of Archaeopteryx lithographica. (C) Skull of Confuciusornis sanctus. (D) Comparison of the skulls ofC. sanctus and a pigeon (bottom). (E) Skull of Hesperornis regalis (after ). (F) Ichthyornis dispar (after ).

Tiphaine Davit-Béal, et al. J Anat. 2009 Apr;214(4):477-501.
5.
Fig. 5

Fig. 5. From: Loss of teeth and enamel in tetrapods: fossil record, genetic data and morphological adaptations.

Simplified turtle relationships (after ; ; ). Green lines: lineages with palatine teeth only; red lines: toothless lineages. (A) Skull of Proganochelys quenstedti (from ). (B) Dorsal view of the skull and beak of the snapping turtle (aquatic). (C) Skull and beak of a terrestrial turtle. †Extinct lineages.

Tiphaine Davit-Béal, et al. J Anat. 2009 Apr;214(4):477-501.
6.
Fig. 6

Fig. 6. From: Loss of teeth and enamel in tetrapods: fossil record, genetic data and morphological adaptations.

(A and C) Lateral and ventral views of the skull of a primitive tetrapod, the parareptilian Procolophon. (B and D) Lateral and ventral views of the skull of Proganochelys quenstedti. (E) Ventral view of the skull of Kayentachelys aprix. Small dots represent teeth. M, maxillary; Pal, palatine; Pm, pre-maxillary; Pt, pterygoid; V, vomer. (A and C) From . (B and D) From . (E) From . Scale bars, 1 cm.

Tiphaine Davit-Béal, et al. J Anat. 2009 Apr;214(4):477-501.
7.
Fig. 10

Fig. 10. From: Loss of teeth and enamel in tetrapods: fossil record, genetic data and morphological adaptations.

Simplified phylogeny of Cetacea (after ; ). (A) Skull of an early archaeocete, Pakicetus from the early Eocene. (B) The toothed jaws of an odontocete, the orca Orcinus orca. (C) The edentulous jaw of a mysticete, the bowhead whale Balaena mysticetus. (D) Detail of a baleen plate of a gray whale Eschrichtius robustus. †Extinct lineages.

Tiphaine Davit-Béal, et al. J Anat. 2009 Apr;214(4):477-501.
8.
Fig. 13

Fig. 13. From: Loss of teeth and enamel in tetrapods: fossil record, genetic data and morphological adaptations.

Ornithorhynchus anatinus, the platypus. (A) Lateral view of the skull in a juvenile. (B) Lateral view of the skull in adult. (C) The three teeth (a small pre-molar and two molars) on the upper left maxilla of a juvenile. (D) The three opposite teeth on the lower left jaw. Bars: A and B, 1 cm; C and D, 1 mm.

Tiphaine Davit-Béal, et al. J Anat. 2009 Apr;214(4):477-501.
9.
Fig. 8

Fig. 8. From: Loss of teeth and enamel in tetrapods: fossil record, genetic data and morphological adaptations.

Simplified phylogeny of Xenarthra and Afrotheria (after ; ). Red lines: toothless lineages; blue lines: enamel-less lineages; green lines: enamel reduction. (A) Lateral view of the skull and detail of the upper cheek teeth of an aardvark, Orycteropus afer. (B) Ventral view of the skull and of the upper right jaw, and detail of extracted teeth of a nine-banded armadillo, Dasypus novemdelineatus. (C) Ventral view of the skull of a giant anteater, Myrmecophaga tridactyla. (D) Ventral view of the skull and detail of the upper jaw of a three-toed sloth. †Extinct lineages.

Tiphaine Davit-Béal, et al. J Anat. 2009 Apr;214(4):477-501.
10.
Fig. 7

Fig. 7. From: Loss of teeth and enamel in tetrapods: fossil record, genetic data and morphological adaptations.

Lateral and ventral views of the skull of Monotremata. (A) The echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus. (B) A fossil (adult) ornithorhynchid, Obdurodon dicksoni (after ). In this species the skull morphology is very similar to that in platypus (see ), except for the presence of teeth in adults (two pre-molars and two or three molars). Scale bars: A, 1 cm; B, 2 cm.

Tiphaine Davit-Béal, et al. J Anat. 2009 Apr;214(4):477-501.
11.
Fig. 9

Fig. 9. From: Loss of teeth and enamel in tetrapods: fossil record, genetic data and morphological adaptations.

Simplified phylogeny of Pholidota (after ; ). Red lines: toothless lineages. (A) Dorsal view of the right dentary of a primitive palaeanodont (Eocene) showing the large canine (no incisors) and the alveoli for three pre-molars p2–p4 (p1 absent) and two molars. Modified after . (B) Ventral view of the skull and lower jaw of a living pangolin, Manis javanica. Note the extremely narrow and weak blade-like mandible. †Extinct lineages. Scale bars: A, 1 mm; B, 1 cm.

Tiphaine Davit-Béal, et al. J Anat. 2009 Apr;214(4):477-501.
12.
Fig. 11

Fig. 11. From: Loss of teeth and enamel in tetrapods: fossil record, genetic data and morphological adaptations.

Histological evidence of embryonic teeth developing in the embryos of the baleen whale Balaenoptera physalus. Most tooth germs attain an advanced bell stage, until dentine deposition, and are then progressively resorbed. (A–D) Tooth morphogenesis and differentiation. (E and F) Resorption. (A) Cap stage. (B) Bell stage; dental epithelium starts to fold around dental papilla cells. (C) Advanced bell stage, in which the dental epithelium entirely surrounds the dental papilla. (D) A thin layer of dentine has been deposited; enamel is not identified. The arrows point to numerous capillary blood vessels located close to the dentine layer. (E) Initiation of resorption process. White arrows indicate osteoclasts. Black arrow points to blood vessels. (F) Advanced stage of resorption. Black arrows indicate the dentine; white arrow points to osteoclasts. Modified after . Bars: A, 50 µm; B, C, E and F, 100 µm; D, 500 µm.

Tiphaine Davit-Béal, et al. J Anat. 2009 Apr;214(4):477-501.
13.
Fig. 3

Fig. 3. From: Loss of teeth and enamel in tetrapods: fossil record, genetic data and morphological adaptations.

A shift in the positioning of the odontogenic epithelium relative to the dental competent mesenchyme could explain the loss of the ability to form teeth in the modern bird ancestor. Schematic drawings summarizing the chick tooth experiments. (A) Mouse molar developmental stages, from bud [embryonic day (E)12.5] to cap (E14.5) to bell (E16.5). The condensing mesenchyme around the bud stage tooth germ expresses Bmp4 and Msx1 and induces development of the enamel knot at the cap stage, which expresses signalling molecules such as Shh. The inner enamel epithelium forms the ameloblasts that form enamel, whereas the adjacent mesenchyme forms the odontoblasts that form dentine (see ). (B) Chick development. At Hamburger & Hamilton (HH) stage 28 a bud-like thickening of the oral epithelium is observed. Expression of Bmp4 and Msx1 is not, however, associated with this region. No further tooth development is observed at later stages and the thickening regresses. Note that, at an earlier stage (stage 24), Bmp4 expression is epithelial and shifts into the mesenchyme at stage 28 (). (C) When a bead impregnated with Bmp4 and Fgf4 is implanted into the chick epithelium, the expression of Bmp4 and Msx1 in the mesenchyme extends around the developing tooth bud. This leads to the extension and folding of the bud epithelium, and induction of Shh. No further progression of the tooth germs is observed, however (). (D) When mouse mesenchyme is combined with chick epithelium (either by recombination of mandible tissue or by earlier neural crest grafts of mouse neural crest into a chick embryo), the chick epithelium induces Msx1 and Bmp4 in the mouse mesenchyme. The tooth germ progresses to the cap stage and forms an enamel knot-like structure expressing Shh. The mouse tissue differentiates into odontoblasts and forms a bell stage tooth germ. Tooth differentiation does not proceed beyond this stage and enamel is not deposited (; ). (E) In the chick mutant talpid2 a shift in the positioning of the epithelium and mesenchyme has been described (indicated by dashed lines and arrows). The chick epithelium is able to induce expression of Bmp4 in the underlying mesenchyme and expresses Shh. The tooth germ develops by evagination, similar to that observed in alligator embryos. At later stages differentiated odontoblasts are identified by histology but no further differentiation occurs ().

Tiphaine Davit-Béal, et al. J Anat. 2009 Apr;214(4):477-501.

Display Settings:

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center