• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of jbacterPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalJB ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
J Bacteriol. Dec 2000; 182(24): 7075–7077.
PMCID: PMC94837
Note

Transcription Activation by a Variety of AraC/XylS Family Activators Does Not Depend on the Class II-Specific Activation Determinant in the N-Terminal Domain of the RNA Polymerase Alpha Subunit

Abstract

The N-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit (α-NTD) was tested for a role in transcription activation by a variety of AraC/XylS family members. Based on substitutions at residues 162 to 165 and an extensive genetic screen we conclude that α-NTD is not an activation target for these activators.

The AraC/XylS family is a large family of transcription regulators, many of whose members activate virulence factors in bacterial pathogens and hence are of interest as potential targets of antibacterial agents (9). Virtually all AraC/XylS family members are capable of transcription activation, and thus it is likely the mechanisms used by these proteins to activate transcription have been conserved, although subsets of family members may use different mechanisms. A variety of AraC/XylS family members have been shown to require the RNA polymerase α subunit C-terminal domain (α-CTD) and the C-terminal end of the ς subunit for full activation (4, 1219; S. M. Egan and C. C. Holcroft, unpublished results; R. Ruiz, J. L. Ramos, and S. M. Egan, unpublished results). However, for several family members it is believed that one or more additional activation targets have yet to be identified. For example, SoxS has been shown to be capable of activating in vitro transcription of a class II promoter when the reconstituted RNA polymerase lacks both the α-CTD and the C-terminal residues of ς70 (K.-W. Jair and R. E. Wolf, Jr., unpublished results). There is also evidence that additional activation targets may exist in the cases of MarA, RhaS and RhaR (4, 12, 13) (Holcroft and Egan, unpublished results; R. Martin, personal communication).

Effect of α-NTD derivatives on activation by RhaS, RhaR, XylS, MarA and SoxS.

Niu et al. (24) have demonstrated that residues 162 to 165 of the RNA polymerase α subunit N-terminal domain (α-NTD) are required for transcription activation at class II cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (CRP)-dependent promoters where the CRP binding site overlaps the promoter −35 hexamer. To test whether α-NTD plays a role in transcription activation by a variety of AraC/XylS family activators, we transformed strains carrying a wild-type chromosomal copy of rpoA with plasmids overexpressing either wild-type α or previously described alanine substitution derivatives of α (24).

Activation of the rhaBAD promoter requires RhaS bound to a site that overlaps the −35 hexamer, CRP bound at −92.5, and α-CTD (6, 7, 12). Activation of the divergent rhaSR operon requires RhaR bound to a site that overlaps the −35 hexamer, CRP bound at −111.5 and α-CTD (29, 30) (Holcroft and Egan, unpublished). We grew strains carrying the α-NTD derivatives and rhaB-lacZ or rhaS-lacZ fusions in MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) minimal medium with 0.4% glycerol, 0.2% l-rhamnose, and 125 μg of ampicillin per ml and then assayed for β-galactosidase expression as previously described (3). We found that none of the substitutions produced a significant defect in activation (Table (Table1).1).

TABLE 1
RhaS and RhaR activation with alanine substitutions in α-NTD

In the presence of an effector such as 3-methylbenzoate, XylS activates expression of the Pseudomonas putida TOL plasmid meta promoter, Pm, from a site that overlaps the −35 hexamer (10). The Pm promoter system was reconstituted in Escherichia coli MC4100 (28) by transformation with pERD100, which carries Φ(Pm-′lacZ) (1), a derivative of pLOW2 (11) encoding xylS, and the plasmid encoding wild-type α or alanine substitution derivatives. These strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium with 100 μg of ampicillin, 25 μg of kanamycin, and 10 μg of tetracycline per ml, and β-galactosidase assays were performed as previously described (23, 26). We found that expression of the α-NTD derivatives had no significant effects on activation by XylS (Table (Table2)2) or the related activator (25) XylS1 (data not shown).

TABLE 2
XylS activation at Φ(Pm-′lacZ) with alanine substitutions in α-NTD

The structure of the single domain MarA protein has been determined in complex with DNA (27). MarA is capable of activating transcription of a large variety of promoters (2), in some cases from a site that overlaps the −35 hexamer (class II), and in other cases from a site further upstream (class I) (20). We tested the effect of the α-NTD derivatives on MarA-dependent activation at lacZ fusions to two class I (fpr and zwf, data not shown) and three class II (inaA, fumC, and micF) promoters (Table (Table3).3). Cultures were grown in LB medium-ampicillin (100 μg/ml) and induced with 5 mM salicylate for 1 h, and β-galactosidase activity was assayed as described previously (22, 23). We found no significant defects at any of the MarA-dependent promoters.

TABLE 3
MarA activation at class II promoters with alanine substitutions in α-NTD

Similar to MarA, SoxS consists of a single domain and can activate class I and class II promoters (8). Activation of class II promoters was not significantly decreased upon deletion of α-CTD (15), and residues at the C-terminal end of ς70 are not essential for transcription activation by SoxS (Jair and Wolf, unpublished). To test for a role of α-NTD in SoxS activation, we assayed strains bearing translational fusions of four class II SoxS-dependent promoters (fumC, micF, nfo, and sodA) (Table (Table4)4) and two class I SoxS-dependent promoters (zwf and fpr) (data not shown). Cultures were grown in LB medium-ampicillin (125 μg/ml), induced for 1 h with 0.5 mM paraquat, and then assayed as previously described (23). The α-NTD derivatives conferred no significant effects on transcription activation of the class I or class II SoxS-dependent promoters.

TABLE 4
SoxS activation at class II promoters ith alanine substitutions in α-NTD

Genetic screen for mutations in rpoA resulting in SoxS activation defects.

Given that the mutations at residues 162 to 165 had no effect, a screen for other rpoA mutations affecting activation of class II SoxS-dependent promoters was designed. To construct the screening strain, we moved a soxR constitutive mutation (31), which provided an intermediate level of SoxS, into a strain that contained a fumC-lacZ fusion (21). This strain was transformed with derivatives of plasmid pREIIα (5) in which the entire rpoA gene had been subjected to PCR mutagenesis with Taq polymerase (32) using primers with the same sequence as those used by Niu et al. (24). The transformants were screened on lactose-tetrazolium plates (23) containing ampicillin (100 μg/ml) and kanamycin (20 μg/ml). The strain carrying the soxRC1 allele produced white colonies with light pink centers whereas a similarly uninduced isogenic strain with the wild-type allele of soxR produced red colonies. In the presence of paraquat, both strains produced white colonies. We demonstrated that less than a twofold reduction in lacZ expression in this strain resulted in reddish colonies that were clearly distinguishable from the pink-centered wild-type colonies. Approximately 24,000 transformants were screened from 26 independent mutagenesis reactions. No mutations in α-NTD were isolated that conferred a defective phenotype; however, the screen readily yielded mutations in α-CTD.

We next confined a genetic screen to α-NTD (by PCR mutagenesis of only the XbaI-to-HindIII fragment of pREIIα) to determine whether any α-NTD substitutions conferred activation defects. Twenty independent PCR mutagenesis mixtures were ligated into pREIIα, and 18,000 transformants were screened. Only one transformant with an activation-deficient phenotype was identified, and this plasmid turned out to have a rearrangement that produced an α-CTD deletion. As a control, we also screened for mutations in α-CTD and found 16 apparent activation-deficient mutants among just two independent PCRs and 2,000 transformants. Therefore, while we readily obtained mutations in the α-CTD by using this mutagenesis strategy, we were again unable to isolate any mutations in the α-NTD that influenced SoxS activation.

Remarks.

From the results of this work, we conclude that transcription activation by RhaS, RhaR, XylS, MarA, and SoxS does not require contact with the 162-to-165 determinant of α-NTD, nor, most likely, any other portion of α-NTD. The activators tested in this study represent a diverse set of AraC/XylS family proteins, which, with the exception of particularly related pairs (MarA/SoxS and RhaS/RhaR), share only 24 to 28% amino acid sequence identity. It is likely, therefore, that our conclusions apply to many other AraC/XylS family members.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Richard H. Ebright for providing the plasmids encoding α-NTD derivatives and Robert Martin and Judah Rosner for providing strains.

Work in the laboratory of S.M.E. was supported by Public Health Service grant GM55099 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences and the Franklin Murphy Molecular Biology Endowment. Work in the laboratory of R.E.W. was supported by Public Health Service grant GM27113 from the National Institutes of General Medical Sciences. R.R. received a travel fund from the Spanish Ministry of Education to visit the laboratory of S.M.E. at the University of Kansas. Work in the laboratory of J.L.R. was funded by grant BIO-97-0641.

REFERENCES

1. Abril M A, Michan C, Timmis K N, Ramos J L. Regulator and enzyme specificity of TOL plasmid-encoded upper pathway for degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons and expansion of the substrate range of the pathway. J Bacteriol. 1989;171:6782–6790. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Barbosa T M, Levy S B. Differential expression of over 60 chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli by constitutive expression of MarA. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:3467–3474. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Bhende P M, Egan S M. Amino acid-DNA contacts by RhaS: an AraC family transcription activator. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:5185–5192. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Bhende P M, Egan S M. Genetic evidence that transcription activation by RhaS involves specific amino acid contacts with sigma 70. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:4959–4969. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Blatter E E, Ross W, Tang H, Gourse R L, Ebright R H. Domain organization of RNA polymerase α subunit: C-terminal 85 amino acids constitute a domain capable of dimerization and DNA binding. Cell. 1994;78:889–896. [PubMed]
6. Egan S M, Schleif R F. DNA-dependent renaturation of an insoluble DNA binding protein. Identification of the RhaS binding site at rhaBAD. J Mol Biol. 1994;243:821–829. [PubMed]
7. Egan S M, Schleif R F. A regulatory cascade in the induction of rhaBAD. J Mol Biol. 1993;234:87–98. [PubMed]
8. Fawcett W P, Wolf R E., Jr Purification of a MalE-SoxS fusion protein and identification of the control sites of Escherichia coli superoxide-inducible genes. Mol Microbiol. 1994;14:669–679. [PubMed]
9. Gallegos M-T, Schleif R, Bairoch A, Hofmann K, Ramos J L. AraC/XylS family of transcriptional regulators. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997;61:393–410. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Gonzalez-Perez M M, Ramos J L, Gallegos M T, Marques S. Critical nucleotides in the upstream region of the XylS-dependent TOL meta-cleavage pathway operon promoter as deduced from analysis of mutants. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:2286–2290. [PubMed]
11. Hansen L H, Sorensen S J, Jensen L B. Chromosomal insertion of the entire Escherichia coli lactose operon, into two strains of Pseudomonas, using a modified mini-Tn5 delivery system. Gene. 1997;186:167–173. [PubMed]
12. Holcroft C C, Egan S M. Roles of cyclic AMP receptor protein and the carboxyl-terminal domain of the α subunit in transcription activation of the Escherichia coli rhaBAD operon. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:3529–3535. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Jair K, Martin R G, Rosner J L, Fujita N, Ishihama A, Wolf R E., Jr Purification and regulatory properties of MarA protein, a transcriptional activator of Escherichia coli multiple antibiotic and superoxide resistance promoters. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:7100–7104. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Jair K-M, Yu X, Skarstad K, Thony B, Fujita N, Ishihama A, Wolf R E., Jr Transcriptional activation of promoters of the superoxide and multiple antibiotic resistance regulons by Rob, a binding protein of the Escherichia coli origin of chromosomal replication. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:2507–2513. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Jair K-W, Fawcett W P, Fujita N, Ishihama A, Wolf R E., Jr Ambidextrous transcriptional activation by SoxS: requirement for the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit in a subset of Escherichia coli superoxide-inducible genes. Mol Microbiol. 1996;19:307–317. [PubMed]
16. Landini P, Bown J A, Volkert M R, Busby S J W. Ada protein-RNA polymerase ς subunit interaction and α subunit-promoter DNA interactions are necessary at different steps in transcription activation at the Escherichia coli ada and aidB promoters. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:13307–13312. [PubMed]
17. Landini P, Busby S J. The Escherichia coli Ada protein can interact with two distinct determinants in the ς70 subunit of RNA polymerase according to promoter architecture: identification of the target of Ada activation at the alkA promoter. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:1524–1529. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Landini P, Gaal T, Ross W, Volkert M R. The RNA polymerase α subunit carboxyl-terminal domain is required for both basal and activated transcription from the alkA promoter. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:15914–15919. [PubMed]
19. Lonetto M A, Rhodius V, Lamberg K, Kiley P, Busby S, Gross C. Identification of a contact site for different transcription activators in region 4 of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase ς70 subunit. J Mol Biol. 1998;284:1353–1365. [PubMed]
20. Martin R G, Gillette W K, Rhee S, Rosner J L. Structural requirements for marbox function in transcriptional activation of mar/sox/rob regulon promoters in Escherichia coli: sequence, orientation and spacial relationship to the core promoter. Mol Microbiol. 1999;34:431–441. [PubMed]
21. Martin R G, Gillette W K, Rosner J L. Promoter discrimination by the related transcriptional activators MarA and SoxS: differential regulation by differential binding. Mol Microbiol. 2000;35:623–634. [PubMed]
22. Martin R G, Rosner J L. Fis, an accessorial factor for transcriptional activation of the mar (multiple antibiotic resistance) promoter of Escherichia coli in the presence of the activator MarA, SoxS, or Rob. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:7410–7419. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Miller J H. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1972.
24. Niu W, Kim Y, Tau G, Heyduk T, Ebright R H. Transcription activation at class II CAP-dependent promoters: two interactions between CAP and RNA polymerase. Cell. 1996;87:1123–1134. [PubMed]
25. Osborne D J, Pickup R W, Williams P A. The presence of two homologous meta pathway operons on TOL plasmid pWW53. J Gen Microbiol. 1988;134:2965–2975. [PubMed]
26. Ramos J L, Stolz A, Reineke W, Timmis K N. Altered effector specificities in regulators of gene expression: TOL plasmid xylS mutants and their use to engineer expansion of the range of aromatics degraded by bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:8467–8471. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Rhee S, Martin R G, Rosner J L, Davies D R. A novel DNA-binding motif in MarA: the first structure for an AraC family transcriptional activator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:10413–10418. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Silhavy T J, Berman M L, Enquist L W. Experiments with gene fusions. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1984.
29. Tobin J F, Schleif R F. Purification and properties of RhaR, the positive regulator of the l-rhamnose operons of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1990;211:75–89. [PubMed]
30. Tobin J F, Schleif R F. Transcription from the rha operon psr promoter. J Mol Biol. 1990;211:1–4. [PubMed]
31. Tsaneva I R, Weiss B. soxR, a locus governing a superoxide response regulon in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:4197–4205. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Zhou Y H, Zhang X P, Ebright R H. Random mutagenesis of gene-sized DNA molecules by use of PCR with Taq DNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:6052. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...