![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2001, American Society of Plant Physiologists Differential Regulation of a Family of Apyrase Genes from
Medicago truncatula1 Center for Legume Research, Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 (J.R.C., G.S.); Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas (T.U., S.R., Y.-W.N., D.-J.K., R.V.P., D.R.C.); Clemson University Genomics Institute, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina (T.C.W.); and Departments of Plant Pathology (R.L.D., N.D.Y.) and Plant Biology (N.D.Y.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55108 *Corresponding author; e-mail gstacey/at/utk.edu; fax
865–974–4007. Received October 19, 2000; Accepted December 4, 2000. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Four putative apyrase genes were identified from the model legume
Medicago truncatula. Two of the genes identified from
M. truncatula (Mtapy1 and Mtapy4) are
expressed in roots and are inducible within 3 h after inoculation
with Sinorhizobium meliloti. The level of mRNA
expression of the other two putative apyrases, Mtapy2
and Mtapy3, was unaffected by rhizobial inoculation.
Screening of a bacterial artificial chromosome library of M.
truncatula genomic DNA showed that Mtapy1,
Mtapy3, and Mtapy4 are present on a
single bacterial artificial chromosome clone. This apyrase cluster was
mapped to linkage group seven. A syntenic region on soybean linkage
group J was found to contain at least two apyrase genes. Screening of
nodulation deficient mutants of M. truncatula revealed
that two such mutants do not express apyrases to any detectable level.
The data suggest a role for apyrases early in the nodulation response
before the involvement of root cortical cell division leading to the
nodule structure. Apyrases are enzymes that have the
ability to hydrolyze nucleotide tri- and diphosphates to nucleotide
monophosphates (Komoszynski and Wojtczak, 1996). Apyrases have been
identified in almost all organisms investigated and have been proposed
to function in very diverse roles, including blood platelet aggregation
(Marcus and Safier, 1993), neurotransmission (Sarkis and Salto, 1991;
Edwards and Gibb, 1993), protein glycosylation (Abeijon et al., 1993;
Gao et al., 1999), and phosphate metabolism (Thomas et al., 1999).
Apyrases can be classified as endoapyrases, enzymes that act
intracellularly, and as ectoapyrases, enzymes that have their catalytic
domain outside the cell. One function proposed for apyrases in animals
is the regulation of blood platelet aggregation. Ectoapyrases present
in the saliva of many insects that feed on blood can prevent blood
platelet aggregation directly by decreasing the ADP concentration in
damaged tissues (Marcus and Safier, 1993; Komoszynski and Wojtczak,
1996 and refs. therein). It is normal that the concentration of ADP in
the extracellular space increases in response to damage. ADP is then
able to bind to P2 purinergic receptors on
platelets, causing their concomitant aggregation (Komoszynski, and
Wojtczak, 1996). Apyrases found in animal cells have also been proposed
to function in neurotransmission by interacting indirectly with
P2 purinoreceptors (Edwards and Gibb, 1993).
These receptors have a high affinity for ATP and ADP, but a much lower
affinity for AMP. Ectoapyrases present in synaptic membranes are
thought to degrade ATP in the synaptic space (Sarkis and Salto, 1991).
As the pool of ATP is hydrolyzed to AMP, the receptor is released and
its stimulation is broken (Komoszynski and Wojtczak, 1996). In
addition, apyrase effects on the ATP + ADP/AMP ratio modulate the
action of 5′-nucleotidase, an enzyme that is abundant in the synaptic
space. This enzyme is inhibited by ATP and ADP, but is activated by
AMP. Two endoapyrases, GDA1 and YND1, identified in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae are postulated to regulate protein glycosylation in the
Golgi (Abeijon et al., 1993; Gao et al., 1999). These apyrases control
the turn over of GDP arising from hydrolysis of GTP sugars. In support
of this hypothesis, a yeast strain that is defective in the production
of GDA1 and YND1 was found to grow very slowly and exhibited defects in
cell wall integrity and protein glycosylation (Gao et al.,
1999). Apyrases identified in plants have been implicated to play functional
roles in a variety of different systems. For example, an apyrase
purified from pea nuclei was originally reported to be involved in
phytochrome responses (Chen and Roux, 1986; Chen, et al., 1987).
Enzymatic activity of this protein was stimulated by
Ca2+/calmodulin. This pea NTPase was more
recently reported to play a role in mediating the uptake of phosphate
from the extracellular matrix (Thomas et al., 1999). The pea apyrase
has been found not only in nuclei, but also in the plasma membrane.
Transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing the pea apyrase showed
enhanced growth compared with the wild type and could utilize exogenous
ATP as a source of inorganic phosphate (Thomas et al., 1999). It has
been postulated that an apyrase isolated from potato is involved in
starch biosynthesis (Handa and Guidotti, 1996). A recent report indicated that an apyrase purified from the roots of
the legume Dolichos biflorus, lectin nucleotide
phosphohydrolase (LNP), bound to the lipo-chitin nodulation signals
produced by Bradyrhizobium spp. (Etzler et al., 1999). These
lipo-chitin signals are essential for nodulation and trigger the
de novo organogenesis of the root nodule (for review, see Cohn et al.,
1998). The D. biflorus apyrase showed highest affinity for
the Nod signals produced by Bradyrhizobium japonicum and
Rhizobium spp. NGR234, bacteria that are able to nodulate
D. biflorus. LNP was localized by immunofluorescence to the
surface of the root hairs, the primary site of rhizobial infection.
Binding of Nod signals to LNP stimulated ATPase activity. Two apyrases
have recently been characterized in soybean, one of which is
transcriptionally activated by rhizobia (Day et al., 2000). The protein
product of this gene, GS52, was immunolocalized to Suc gradient
fractions enriched in plasma membrane, suggesting that this protein is
plasma membrane associated. In addition, pretreatment of roots with
antiserum raised against LNP or GS52 inhibited the ability of rhizobia
to nodulate D. biflorus or soybean, respectively (Etzler et
al., 1999; Day et al., 2000). These data, taken together, suggest that
LNP and GS52, an orthologous protein from soybean, are promising
candidates for Nod signal receptors involved in the nodulation
response. Due to their postulated role in nodulation and possible importance to
plant metabolism we initiated a study to characterize the apyrase genes
found in Medicago truncatula. This plant has been proposed
as a model for the genetic study of legumes and is currently the
subject of intensive investigation (Barker et al., 1990; Cook, 1999).
Using primers designed from conserved apyrase motifs, four unique
apyrase cDNAs were isolated from M. truncatula. Genetic
mapping analysis indicated that at least three of these genes share
synteny with apyrase genes characterized in soybean. To our knowledge,
this is the first report of synteny between soybean and M.
truncatula. Analysis of mRNA expression indicated that M.
truncatula apyrases are differentially expressed in various
tissues. Two of these genes are rapidly induced upon rhizobial
inoculation, similar to the expression pattern of a group of genes that
have been postulated to be involved in the nodulation process, i.e.
early nodulins (ENODs). Proteins that are specifically expressed during
nodulation have been termed nodulins. ENODs are expressed within
48 h after rhizobial inoculation. The rapid accumulation of
apyrase mRNA in response to rhizobia classifies these apyrases as
ENODs. Consistent with the possibility that these genes play an
important role in nodulation, apyrase expression was dramatically
reduced in nodulation deficient mutant lines of M.
truncatula. RESULTS Identification of a cDNA Encoding a Putative Apyrase
Gene An M. truncatula cDNA was identified by
touch-down-PCR (TD-PCR) using primers designed from conserved domains
found in a variety of apyrases (Fig. (Fig.1).
1
The sequence of Mtapy1 (GenBank accession no. AF288132)
predicts an open reading frame of 466 amino acids, encoding a protein
with a calculated molecular mass of 51,600. Hydropathy analysis
of the predicted protein sequence indicated that Mtapy1 has
a single strong transmembrane helix of 20 amino acids at the N terminus
(data not shown). This transmembrane region was also predicted to be a
cleavable N-terminal signal sequence according to the methods of von
Heijne et al. (1986; Emanuelsson et al., 2000). Comparison of the sequence of Mtapy1 with other genes in the
nonredundant National Center for Biotechnology Information protein
sequence database using a BLASTP search identified several possible
orthologs (Altschul et al., 1997). We also identified possible
orthologous genes using a dbEST search (Pearson et al., 1997).
Alignment of Mtapy1 with the sequence of other known genes
in the database revealed that Mtapy1 contained all four of
the putative conserved apyrase domains (Fig. (Fig.1;1 Mtapy1 Is Induced Rapidly in Response to
Sinorhizobium meliloti Inoculation Since the D. biflorus apyrase has been implicated in
nodulation (Etzler et al., 1999), northern-blot analysis was
used to see if the level of apyrase mRNA significantly increased upon
rhizobial inoculation. We performed a time course of expression of
Mtapy1 using total RNA isolated from roots of wild-type
M. truncatula line A17 inoculated with S.
meliloti strain ABS7M. As seen in Figure
Figure2,2
Identification of a Second Putative Apyrase Gene from M.
truncatula A search of the dbEST sequence database using the
Mtapy1 sequence identified a distinct apyrase from
a cDNA library made from M. truncatula root hair
tissue (Covitz et al., 1998; GenBank accession no. AA660474). Using the
sequence in the database, primers were designed and used in a reverse
transcriptase- (RT) PCR reaction to clone the corresponding cDNA. This
approach yielded a plasmid JRC201 containing a partial cDNA clone of
430 bp. DNA sequence analysis revealed that this PCR fragment was
identical to the sequence found in the dbEST database, but distinct
from Mtapy1. Therefore, this apyrase cDNA was designated
Mtapy2. Sequence analysis was also confirmed by the
identification of a second expressed sequence tag (EST) sequence from a
different EST library (dbEST accession no. AI974272). This EST clone,
pKV01 M6, was kindly provided by Dr. Kate
VandenBosch (Texas A&M University, College Station) and the clone was
sequenced. The overlapping regions in this sequence and the original
EST sequence (accession no. AA660474) indicated that they represent the
same gene, namely, Mtapy2. The additional sequence
information was critical for subsequent phylometric analyses. M. truncatula Linkage Group 7 Contains an Apyrase Gene
Cluster Mtapy1 was used as a probe to screen a M.
truncatula bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library (Nam et
al., 1999). Two hybridizing BAC clones, 52G10 and 58
M19, were isolated and confirmed by Southern-blot
hybridization (data not shown). As shown in Figure
Figure3,3
Genetic Mapping of Apyrases To determine the genetic map position of the apyrase cluster
(Mtapy1, Mtapy3, and Mtapy4) and of
Mtapy2, codominant PCR-based cleaved amplified polymorphic
sequence (CAPS) markers were developed. In brief, BAC end sequence
information from BACs 6L13 and 58 M19
(corresponding to the apyrase cluster) and from BAC 20K21
(corresponding to Mtapy2) was used to design oligonucleotide
primers. PCR amplification and sequencing of genomic DNA from M.
truncatula mapping genotypes A17 and A20 allowed the development
of three CAPS markers, as detailed in Table
II. As shown in Figure
Figure4,4
The position of the M. truncatula apyrase markers is
shown relative to selected core markers on these linkage groups (D.-J.
Kim and D.R. Cook, personal communication). Because several of
the M. truncatula core markers were developed based on
homology to mapped restriction fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP)
clones from soybean genetic map
(http://ars-genome.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/WebAce/webace?db=3Dsoybase; D.-J. Kim and D.R. Cook, unpublished data), it is
possible to identify putative syntenic relationships between the
M. truncatula and soybean genomes. One such marker
designated DK427-R maps in close proximity to the apyrase cluster
marker 58T (Fig. (Fig.4).4 Phylogenetic Analysis of Apyrases A recent report indicated that plant apyrases are separated into
two distinct families based on phylogenetic studies (Roberts et al.,
1999). It was suggested that LNP-like genes from a number of different
sources were members of a distinct class of apyrases that may be unique
to legumes. We performed a similar phylogenetic analysis with the
apyrase sequences from M. truncatula by aligning 16 partial
sequences of putative plant apyrases, and a yeast protein, GDA1. One
additional EST sequence of a putative apyrase from M.
truncatula (MtEST, accession no. AJ388942) that is distinct from
Mtapy1, Mtapy2, Mtapy3, and
Mtapy4 was included in the phylogenetic analysis. A
neighbor-joining tree generated from this alignment shows that there
appear to be at least five subfamilies of apyrases found in plants
(Fig. (Fig.5).5
A further phylogenetic analysis was performed with the apyrases from
M. truncatula to study their evolutionary relationships. To
infer the phylogeny of the Mtapy genes, amino acid sequences
of deduced LNP proteins were aligned to the amino acid sequences of
Mtapy1-4 using CLUSTALW (Thompson et al., 1994). An apyrase
from Arabidopsis was also included in the alignment as an out-group.
The results of this analysis showed that Mtapy1,
Mtapy3, and Mtapy4 all group together with the
LNP sequences, whereas Mtapy2 is more closely related to the
out-group apyrase from Arabidopsis (Fig.
(Fig.6).6
MtApy1 and Mtapy4 Are Transiently Induced
after Inoculation with S. meliloti Due to the high degree of sequence similarity shared between the
apyrases identified in M. truncatula, we wanted to identify
which of the genes were induced upon rhizobial inoculation. As shown in
Figure Figure7,7
In contrast to these results, the level of Mtapy2 mRNA was
not significantly enhanced upon rhizobial inoculation (Fig. (Fig.7A).7 Apyrase Genes Are Differentially Expressed in M.
truncatula Tissues To analyze the tissue-specific expression of apyrase genes in
M. truncatula we used gene-specific primers and RT-PCR to
analyze mRNA levels in various tissues. We isolated total RNA from the
roots, hypocotyls, and cotyledons of 5-d-old seedlings, and from the
stems, leaves, and flowers of 5-week-old plants. These plants were
vernalized at 4°C for 14 d to shorten the flowering time. In
addition, we isolated total RNA from 10-d-old nodules that were
harvested from plants inoculated with wild-type S. meliloti
strain 1021. As shown in Figure Figure8,
8
Apyrase Expression Is an Early Nodulation Event If apyrases are important to the nodulation response, then plant
mutants defective in nodulation may also show reduced or altered
apyrase expression. Moreover, such nodulation mutants can be used to
determine when, during nodule ontogeny, a gene is expressed. Therefore,
we analyzed Mtapy1 expression in three genetically distinct
non-nodulation mutants of M. truncatula (Prabhu, 1998). As
described in Table III, use of these
mutants allowed for the analysis of apyrase expression at distinct,
development time points during early nodulation. For example, these
mutants were either nonresponsive to the bacterial symbiont (i.e. very
early, mutant dmi1), blocked for formation of nodule
primordia (i.e. a later step, mutant pdl1), or in the
formation and/or maintenance of epidermal cell infection (i.e. a step
subsequent to primordium formation, mutant lin). As shown in
Figure Figure9,9
DISCUSSION Many of the very early nodulation responses generated in legume
roots by rhizobial inoculation (including the induction of a nodule
structure) can also be elicited by treatment with the appropriate,
purified lipo-chitin nodulation signal (for review, see
Dénarié et al., 1996; Long, 1996; Minami et al., 1996; Cohn
et al., 1998). Nodulation signals act with high specificity at very low
concentrations and, therefore, they are thought to mediate their
effects through interaction with a specific, protein receptor. The
search for such a receptor is an area of intensive research. A promising candidate for a Nod signal receptor is the apyrase protein
isolated from the roots of the legume D. biflorus, LNP. This
protein was shown to be localized on the root hair surface and to bind
Nod signals from rhizobia capable of nodulating D. biflorus
(Etzler et al., 1999). Moreover, binding of the Nod signal to the
apyrase stimulated ATPase activity, suggesting a possible mode for
signal transduction. In addition, an orthologue of LNP characterized
from soybean, GS52, was localized to the plasma membrane of soybean
roots (Day et al., 2000). One striking result from work with LNP and
the soybean orthologue was the demonstration that antiserum raised
against either protein inhibited the ability of rhizobia to nodulate
their respective hosts, D. biflorus and soybean. These data
suggest that apyrases play a critical role in the early events of
nodulation. It is unfortunate that D. biflorus is a
little-studied legume with limited information available on its
nodulation properties, genetics, preferred symbiont, etc. Although
soybean is well characterized, the large genome size and the fact that
it is an ancestral tetraploid make genetic analysis of this plant
difficult. M. truncatula has recently been touted as a promising model
plant for genetic studies of legumes (Barker et al., 1990; Cook, 1999).
A number of laboratories worldwide are now working to develop this
plant as a model system. The accumulating information on M.
truncatula should be an aid to studies of nodulation. Therefore,
we undertook a study to examine the apyrase genes of this plant as an
initial step in defining the role of these proteins in the nodulation
response. Four apyrase genes were isolated. Due to the close sequence similarity
among these genes we utilized gene-specific primers and RT-PCR to
examine mRNA expression levels. Consistent with a possible role in
nodulation, mRNA levels of Mtapy1 and Mtapy4 were
rapidly elevated upon inoculation of roots with S. meliloti.
The expression pattern of these two genes classifies them as ENODs.
There are only two other examples of legume genes that respond this
quickly to rhizobia (Pichon et al., 1992; Journet et al., 1994;
Cook et al., 1995). The gene encoding ENOD12 has been reported to be
inducible by rhizobia within 1 h after rhizobial inoculation
(Pichon et al., 1992; Horvath et al., 1993; Journet et al.,
1994). At present, there is no known biochemical function for
the Pro-rich ENOD12 protein. In fact, a M. truncatula
subspecies that does not express ENOD12 is not affected in
its ability to nodulate (Csanádi et al., 1994). One ENOD that
does have a proposed function is rip1
(Rhizobium-induced peroxidase). Rip1 mRNA was
transiently induced in M. truncatula roots within 3 h
after S. meliloti inoculation (Cook et al., 1995). This
expression pattern is similar to what was seen for Mtapy1
and Mtapy4. Rip1 has been postulated to play a role in
oxidative processes that occur very early in the nodulation response
(Cook et al., 1995) RT-PCR analysis of gene expression shows that induction of
Mtapy1 and Mtapy4 after S. meliloti
inoculation is transient, reaching a peak of expression 3 to -6 h
postinoculation, but returning to basal levels in 12 to 24 h.
These results are similar to what has been recently found for the
expression pattern of a soybean apyrase, GS52 (Day et al., 2000). The
expression of this gene was transiently increased in response to
inoculation with the soybean symbiont, B. japonicum within
6 h after inoculation. If these apyrases are indeed Nod signal
receptors, it seems at first counterintuitive to see the level of
expression of these genes increase in response to their agonist (i.e.
rhizobia). However, these results are consistent with several reports
of the activation of receptor genes in response to agonist addition in
other systems (Eriksson et al., 1991; Ng et al., 1997; Helmrath et al.,
1998; Kisselgof and Oettgen, 1998; Perera et al., 1999). Analysis of the level of expression of Mtapy1 and
Mtapy4 in response to inoculation with rhizobial mutants
indicated that S. meliloti strains that are not able to
produce Nod signals did not significantly affect the level of
transcription of Mtapy1 or Mtapy4 (data not
shown). These data suggested that only rhizobia that are able to
produce Nod signals are able to induce the transcription of apyrases in
M. truncatula. However, further experiments are necessary to
make any conclusions about specific bacterial factors that might affect
apyrase mRNA expression. The data indicate that Mtapy2 and Mtapy3 are not
induced in response to rhizobial inoculation. However, the
Mtapy2 gene was identified as an EST sequence from a cDNA
library generated from mRNA isolated from M. truncatula root
hair tissue. The root hairs are the site of rhizobial infection and,
therefore, this location would be consistent with a role in nodulation.
Although Mtapy3 mRNA expression was not detected in roots,
there was appreciable expression in nodule tissue. In fact, the tissue
expression pattern of Mtapy3 found in nodules and
flowers is similar to the expression pattern found for the ENOD gene,
ENOD40 (Crespi et al., 1994). Since the focus of this work was on early
nodulation events, Mtapy3 expression was not extensively
examined. Sequencing and genetic mapping placed Mtapy1,
Mtapy3, and Mtapy4 close together on linkage
group 7 of the M. truncatula genome. These three genes are
found on the same BAC contig. Southern hybridization data of this BAC
contig is consistent with the presence of three apyrase genes (data not
shown), although we cannot rule out the possibility of additional
apyrase genes with reduced nucleotide homology in this cluster. PCR
analysis indicated that Mtapy2 was not present on this BAC
contig, but instead Mtapy2 hybridized strongly to BAC 20K21
that mapped to M. truncatula linkage group 4. Apyrase genes have also been characterized from soybean (Day et al.,
2000). Hybridization of these apyrases to high-density BAC filters
indicates that, as we have determined for M. truncatula, the
legume-specific apyrase genes are also clustered in the soybean genome
(N.D. Young, unpublished data). Moreover, genetic mapping data
demonstrated that in M. truncatula and soybean, these
homologous apyrase clusters are tightly linked to a conserved genetic
marker with homology to cotton EST AI727823. The finding of a conserved
genetic locus that contains a cluster of apparently legume-specific
apyrase genes provides the first indication of conserved genome
structure between crop and model legume systems, and it should provide
the basis for more detailed analysis of the conservation of this gene
family within the legume subfamily Papilionoideae. If apyrases play an important role in the nodulation response, then
plant mutants defective in nodulation may show an altered profile of
apyrase expression. Use of such mutants also allowed us to examine
apyrase expression in relation to distinct developmental events during
early nodulation. Northern analysis of ethyl methane sulfatonate- (EMS)
generated, nodulation-defective lines of M. truncatula
identified mutants defective in apyrase expression. Little or no
Mtapy1 mRNA expression was seen in root tissue from the
pdl or dmi mutants. dmi1 is nearly
devoid of symbiotic responses, lacking bacterial infection and
formation of nodule primordia, and has been proposed to function in
transduction of the Nod signal (Catoira et al., 2000), whereas the
pdl mutant develops numbers of infections comparable with
wild-type plants, but fails to develop nodule primordia. In contrast to
dmi1 and pdl, the lin mutant develops
visible nodule primordia, but has a reduced infection phenotype. The
numbers of infection events in lin are reduced relative to
wild type, and those infections that do form are arrested soon after
infection thread initiation. Thus, the observation that symbiotic
expression of Mtapy1 is absent in dmi1 and
pdl, but present in lin suggests that
Mtapy1 expression is correlated with the formation of nodule
primordia, but is apparently independent of rhizobial infection. The
low expression of Mtapy1 in the absence of inoculation in
the dmi1 and pdl mutant lines indicates that
these mutants are not only defective in the induction of apyrase
expression, but also in basal expression. Therefore, it would appear
that the same signaling circuitry involved in inducible
Mtapy1 expression are also involved in maintaining a basal
level of expression. It is interesting that genetic mapping data
indicates that the apyrase cluster shown in Figure Figure33 A role for apyrases in early nodulation has been suggested previously
by Etzler et al. (1999) and Day et al. (2000). In particular, a
subclass of apyrase genes with uniquely high homology among legumes is
implicated in the perception of the Nod signal. Here we have determined
that M. truncatula contains multiple apyrase genes. It is
interesting that several members of the legume-specific clade of
apyrases are clustered in the M. truncatula genome, and
transcripts for each of these apyrase genes can be detected in nodules
by northern-blot analysis or by surveys of nodule derived ESTs in
M. truncatula. Two of these apyrases, designated
Mtapy1 and Mtapy4, are rapidly induced upon
rhizobial inoculation of roots, thus classifying these genes as ENODs.
The differential expression of Mtapy1 in dmi/pdl
in relation to lin establishes a correlation between
expression of Mtapy1 and nodule morphogenesis. Future
studies of this important gene family should benefit from the advent of
an intensively studied model legume system such as M.
truncatula, and the opportunities provided by an increasingly
well-characterized genome (Cook, 1999) and facile transformation
technologies (Trieu et al., 2000). MATERIAL AND METHODS Culture Media and Growth Conditions Escherichia coli strains were grown and
maintained on Luria-Bertani medium (Sambrook et al., 1989) at 37°C.
Sinorhizobium meliloti strains were grown and maintained
on tryptone-yeast extract (TY) medium (Somasegaren and Hoben, 1994) at
30°C. Antibiotics used in this study for selection and plasmid
maintenance were 100 μg mL−1 ampicillin, 50 μg
mL−1 kanamycin, or 10 μg mL−1
tetracycline. Plant Material and Growth Conditions Prior to germination Medicago truncatula seeds
were scarified by treatment with concentrated
H2SO4 for 8 min, rinsed thoroughly with sterile
distilled water, and treated with 5% (v/v) hypochlorite for 3
min. Following thorough rinsing, the seeds were imbibed in sterile
distilled water for 3 to 4 h at room temperature. Treated seeds
were placed into sealed Petri plates on moist filter paper at 4°C in
the dark for at least 48 h and were then transferred to room
temperature in the dark for 24 h. Germinated seedlings were
transferred to growth pouches (Mega International, Minneapolis) or to
aeroponic chambers (Lullien et al., 1987; Gallusci et al., 1991).
Seedlings were grown in inorganic nutrient medium (Lullien et al.,
1987) under a 16-h day/8-h night cycle (22°C light/18°C
dark). Bacterial Inoculation of Plants Prior to plant inoculation, bacteria were grown to late log
phase in TY medium (Somasegaran and Hoben, 1994) supplemented with
appropriate antibiotics. Bacteria were then centrifuged, washed, and
resuspended in sterile distilled water. Bacteria were added directly to
nitrogen-deficient plant nutrient solution (Lullien et al., 1987) in
the aeroponic chambers. Nodulation was rapid and uniform under these
conditions. Plants were grown under a 16-h-light (22°C)/8-h-dark
(18°C) cycle. For inoculation of plants grown in plastic growth pouches, bacteria
were grown to log phase in TY medium and an aliquot was transferred to
fresh medium to monitor growth. Bacterial cultures were grown to an
OD600 of 1.0, centrifuged, washed, and then resuspended in
inorganic nutrient medium (Lullien et al., 1987) to yield
107 cells mL−1. Each plant was inoculated with
1 mL of the bacterial suspension. Nodulation was also rapid and uniform
under these conditions. RNA Isolation Plant tissue samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored
at −80°C until use. RNA was isolated using a protocol modified (Cook
et al., 1995) from the guanidine-HCl extraction protocol (described in
Sambrook et al., 1989). The purified RNA pellet was resuspended in
RNase-free, diethyl pyrocarbonate- (Sigma, St. Louis) treated sterile
distilled water and stored at −80°C until use. TD-PCR For the initial cloning of the M. truncatula
apyrase cDNAs using TD-PCR (Don et al., 1991), degenerate primers
were designed from conserved apyrase motifs present in the pea (Hseih
et al., 1996), potato (Handa and Guidotti, 1996), D.
biflorus (Etzler et al., 1999), and soybean apyrases (Day et
al., 2000). Primers were used in a final concentration of 0.2
μm in all reactions. The primers used for TD-PCR were as
follows: TD-apyrase forward, 5′-ATTGATGGAACCCAAGAAGG -3′; and
TD-apyrase reverse, 5′-GGYAAAGMTGATATGGCTTC-3′ (Y = C/T; M =
A/C). The conditions were as follows: 94°C, 1 min; X°C, 2 min; and
72°C, 3 min, where X represents changing annealing temperatures. The
annealing temperature was steadily decreased by 2°C every 3 cycles
starting at 60°C and ending at 42°C. PCR products were visualized
by agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining (Sambrook
et al., 1989). Cloning of PCR Products PCR products of the expected size were cloned into the
TA-cloning vector pCR2.1 using a TA Cloning Kit
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), or into the TOPO cloning vector
(Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions. In certain
cases ligation products were cloned using the P-GEM-T-EASY kit
(Promega, Madison, WI) and transformed into E. coli
strain JM109 according to Sambrook et al. (1989). Plasmid DNA was
isolated using the alkaline lysis method (Sambrook et al., 1989) or
using the Wizard Plus Mini Prep Kit (Promega). Plasmid DNA was digested
with EcoRI restriction endonuclease (Promega) and was
analyzed by gel electrophoresis (Sambrook et al., 1989). DNA sequencing
of cloned PCR products was performed at the University of Tennessee
Molecular Biology Resource Facility using an ABI 373 DNA sequencer
(Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, CA) with the ABI Prism Dye Terminator Cycle
Sequencing reaction kit. In all cases, both strands of at least two
independent clones were sequenced. Isolation of a Full-Length cDNA Encoding Mtapy1 Extension of the cDNA ends of the 850-bp Mtapy1
product was performed using the 5′- and 3′-RACE kit (Gibco-BRL,
Gaithersburg, MD), according to the manufacturer's
protocol. For extension of the 3′ end, the primer 3′apy1 GSP1 was
employed: 3′-RACEGSP1, 5′-TGCTCGTTGATGGATTTGGC-3′. For extension of the
5′ end, the following primers were employed: 5′apy1GSP1,
5′-ACCTTCATAATCTCAGCTCG-3′; and 5′apy1GSP2, 5′-CTCCAAGATCCATTACTCCC-3′.
Cloning and sequencing of the PCR generated products was performed as
described above. After sequence analysis of the 5′- and 3′-RACE products, primers were
designed to amplify the predicted coding region from the start (first
in frame ATG) to the stop codon. Primers used for amplification of the
full-length cDNA were 5′-Mt46fullORFE and 3′-Mt46fullORFE,
respectively. The primers were used in an RT-PCR reaction as described
above using 0.2 μm of each primer and 2 units of
Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The
reaction was carried out as described above, except a single annealing
temperature of 52°C was used. Cloning and sequencing were performed
as described above. Cloning of Mtapy2 To compare the full sequence of Mtapy1 with known
sequences in the database, a BLAST search was performed (Altschul et
al., 1997). When compared with the EST database dbEST (Pearson et al.,
1997), it was discovered that a very similar gene had been described
from the roots of M. truncatula (Covitz et al., 1998;
accession no. AA660474). The available sequence was used to
generate primers for use in an RT-PCR reaction. The following primers
were used: 5′-Mt46–2, 5′- GGGGCAACTGCAGGTTTAAGGGC-3′; and 3′-Mt46–2,
5′-GAGCCAGATAAGATACACGGG-3′. The product of PCR was a 450-bp fragment
that showed 85% sequence similarity to Mtapy1, and was
designated Mtapy2. BAC Clone Isolation and Manipulation BAC clones of M. truncatula genotype A17 were
identified by means of hybridization to high-density filter arrays
obtained from the Clemson University Genomics Institute
(http://www.genome.clemson.edu), or by PCR screening of a multiplexed
DNA copy of the BAC library as described by Nam et al. (1999). BAC end
sequencing was performed on whole BAC clones using the ABI PRISM BigDye
Primer Cycle Sequencing reaction kit and oligonucleotide primers
complementary to the pBeloBAC11 vector (“left primer,”
AACGCCAGGGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACG; “right primer,”
ACACAGGAAACAGCTATGACCATGATTACG). Internal sequencing of selected
regions of BAC clones was performed by a primer walking strategy on
whole BAC clones or on DNA fragments subcloned into pBluescript
(Stratagene). The BAC contig shown in Figure Figure33 Genetic markers were developed based on BAC end sequence information
obtained from BAC clones with homology to characterized M.
truncatula apyrase cDNA products or to the soybean RFLP clone
B046. In brief, oligonucleotide primers (Table II) were designed based
on the corresponding BAC end sequence information and were used to PCR
amplify and sequence genomic DNA from M. truncatula
genotypes A17 and A20. Comparing differences in restriction enzyme
patterns between the parental genotypes identified restriction enzyme
polymorphisms. The resulting CAPS markers were mapped on a population
of 93 F2 progeny from a genotype A17 × A20 cross
(Penmetsa and Cook, 2000). Polymorphic DNAs were resolved on a 1.5%
(w/v) agarose gel and were visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
Primers, PCR conditions, and restriction enzyme information is given in
Table II. DNA was extracted from the mapping population by means of the
Nucleon Phytopure kit (Amersham Life Sciences, Buckinghamshire,
UK), according to manufacturer's instructions. Soybean BAC Library Screening with GS50 and GS52 An 8× redundant soybean BAC library was spotted onto
high-density nylon membranes at the Clemson University Genomics Center
(Clemson, SC). 32P-labeled probes of GS50 and GS52 were
generated using the Random Primers DNA Labeling System (Gibco-BRL) and
the BAC filters were hybridized as described in Danesh et al.
(1998). Placing BAC Contigs onto the Soybean Genetic Map GS50 and GS52 hybridizations potentially revealed more than one
location in the soybean genome. For this reason positive BACs were
sorted into contigs and those corresponding to previously mapped
apyrase loci were determined. BAC DNA was purified using Polyfiltronic
96-well Uni-Filter 800s (Whatman, Clifton, NJ), as recommended by the
manufacturer. All clones that were positive with GS50 or GS52 along
with genomic DNA from the parents of an recombinant inbred mapping
population described previously (Concibido et al., 1996) were digested
with the restriction enzyme originally used to map GS50 (Day et al.,
2000). Southern blots were then hybridized with radiolabeled GS50 and
GS52 to visualize corresponding restriction fragments. BACs were
grouped into contigs based on similar banding patterns and those BACs
corresponding to the originally mapped locus were identified by
comparing the digestion patterns. Phylogenetic Analysis of M. truncatula Apyrase
Genes For the tree generated in Figure Figure5,5 LNP protein sequences and rbcL DNA sequences were
aligned using CLUSTALW (Thompson et al., 1994), running under default
parameters. For both alignments, end gaps were trimmed. The final
alignment for the LNP protein sequences contained 188 amino acid
positions; the final alignment for the rbcL sequences
contained 1,310 nucleotide positions. DNA and protein distances were
inferred using the DNADIST and PROTDIST programs of the PHYLIP package
(version 3.5c, J. Felsenstein, Department of Genetics, University of
Washington, Seattle), respectively. Bootstrap and neighbor-joining
analysis were performed using the SEQBOOT and NEIGHBOR programs, also
from the PHYLIP package. Both trees in Figure Figure66 Northern-Blot Analysis Total root RNA was isolated from roots at various times between
0 and 6 h after inoculation with S. meliloti strain
ABS7. Total RNA was electrophoresed on denaturing 1% (w/v) agarose
formaldehyde gels and blotted as described by Sambrook et al. (1989).
Each lane was loaded with RNA equivalent to 0.2 g fresh weight of
root tissue. The blot was probed with a 32P-labeled
full-length Mtapy1 cDNA probe, stripped, and then
reprobed with Histone H3 from M. truncatula. In all
cases probes were radiolabeled with 32P using random primer
labeling (Promega). Hybridizations were performed at 60°C followed by
successive washings as previously described (Day et al., 2000). RT-PCR Analysis of Gene Expression Total RNA was collected from 5-d-old roots, hypocotyls, and
cotyledons, from 6-week-old stems, leaves, and flowers, and 10-d-old
nodules using the guanidine-HCl method described above. Total root RNA
was also isolated from M. truncatula A17 plants
inoculated with S. meliloti ABS7M at 0, 3, 6, 12,
24, and 48 h postinoculation. Due to the high degree of sequence similarity between all of the
putative apyrases from M. truncatula, a PCR-based
approach was used to distinguish the expression of the
different genes. Gene-specific primers were designed from
the available sequence of all of the genes from regions of sequence
divergence and from the 3′-untranslated regions. The primers used in
these reactions were as follows: 5′Mt46fullORFE,
5′-GGAATTCATGGTCTTACTTTGGCAAAACACC-3′; 3′Mt46fullORFE,
5′-GGCTTAAGTTAAACAAAATACATCATTCG-3′; Mtapy1 GS forward,
5′-CTGGGGCTAATTTTAATGGATGC-3′; Mtapy1 GS reverse,
5′-GTGGTACCCTCAATAGAAAAAACATGTCGG-3′; Mtapy2 GS forward,
5′-GATGCTGATGCGGTTACAGTGTTG-3′; Mapy2 GS reverse,
5′-CCATGGCAGCCTCAGACTCA-3′; Mtapy3 GS forward,
5′-GGTCACACATAATTCTCCCAACCC-3′; Mtapy3 GS reverse,
5′-GCAGCGTTAAACTTGAGCG-3′; Mtapy4 GS forward,
5′-GTTCAGTAACAGAAGTACCCTCAACG-3′; and Mtapy4 GS reverse,
5′-CACCTACTGTAATCTCTTTTCGTGGAC-3′. These primers were first used in PCR reactions against
reverse transcribed total RNA isolated from pooled M.
truncatula line A17 tissues. The PCR products generated were
cloned, sequenced to confirm gene identity, and subsequently used as
hybridization probes for Southern analysis. RT-PCR reactions were
performed as previously described (Day et al., 2000). In all of the
reactions, primers designed to amplify actin were included as internal
controls in each tube. The sequence of the actin primers were as
follows: 5′Mt ACTIN, 5′-GCAGATGCTGAGGATATTAACCCC-3′; 3′ Mt ACTIN,
5′-CGACCACTTGCATAGAGGGAGAGG-3′. The RT-PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis, blotted, and
hybridized with the appropriate 32P-labeled cDNA probe
(Sambrook et al., 1989). Blots were first probed with the respective
apyrase genes, stripped, and reprobed with actin as an internal
control. All blots were counted for total radioactivity using an
Instant Imager (Packard Instrument Co., Meriden, CT). The total counts
of apyrase probe hybridization were divided by total counts of actin
probe hybridization to yield a ratio of the relative intensity of
hybridization of apyrase. The value obtained was multiplied by 100 to
yield a value referred to as relative expression. Screening of Nodulation-Deficient Mutant Lines of M.
truncatula Penmetsa and Cook (2000) described an efficient EMS mutagenesis
of M. truncatula. Based on screening of the resulting
progeny numerous nodulation mutants were identified, including several
lines affected for symbiotic development (Penmetsa and Cook, 1997;
Catoira et al., 2000; R.V. Penmetsa and D.R. Cook, unpublished data).
Three genetically separable mutants with distinct non-nodulation
phenotypes (Table III) were used for analysis of apyrase gene
expression by RT-PCR as described above. The wild-type
M. truncatula A17 and nodulation defective lines
pdl, dmi1, and lin were
grown aeroponically and inoculated with wild-type S.
meliloti strain ABS7. At each time point, a 5-cm section of
root was sampled surrounding the zone of nodulation. RNA isolation,
northern blotting, and hybridizations were performed as described
previously. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Marilynn Etzler
for providing the sequence of the D. biflorus
apyrase prior to publication. We would also like to thank Kate
VandenBosch for kindly providing us with the EST clone pVK0–1
M6. Footnotes 1This work was supported by the U.S. Department
of Energy (grant no. DE–FG02–97ER20260 to G.S.) and by the National
Science Foundation (grant no. 9872664 to D.R.C. and N.D.Y.). LITERATURE CITED
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996 Feb 2; 1310(2):233-41.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996]FASEB J. 1993 Apr 1; 7(6):516-22.
[FASEB J. 1993]Brain Res Bull. 1991 Jun; 26(6):871-6.
[Brain Res Bull. 1991]FEBS Lett. 1993 Jun 28; 325(1-2):86-9.
[FEBS Lett. 1993]J Biol Chem. 1999 Jul 23; 274(30):21450-6.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]J Biol Chem. 1999 Jul 23; 274(30):21450-6.
[J Biol Chem. 1999]Plant Physiol. 1986; 81():609-13.
[Plant Physiol. 1986]J Biol Chem. 1987 Aug 5; 262(22):10689-94.
[J Biol Chem. 1987]Plant Physiol. 1999 Feb; 119(2):543-52.
[Plant Physiol. 1999]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996 Jan 26; 218(3):916-23.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 11; 96(10):5856-61.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Oct; 13(10):1053-70.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999 Aug; 2(4):301-4.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec; 85(23):8998-9002.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988]Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Jun 11; 14(11):4683-90.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1986]J Mol Biol. 2000 Jul 21; 300(4):1005-16.
[J Mol Biol. 2000]Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1; 25(17):3389-402.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1997]Genomics. 1997 Nov 15; 46(1):24-36.
[Genomics. 1997]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996 Jan 26; 218(3):916-23.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 11; 96(10):5856-61.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]Plant Physiol. 1998 Aug; 117(4):1325-32.
[Plant Physiol. 1998]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Oct; 13(10):1053-70.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000]Mol Gen Genet. 1999 Sep; 262(2):261-7.
[Mol Gen Genet. 1999]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Oct; 13(10):1053-70.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996 Jan 26; 218(3):916-23.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996]Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11; 22(22):4673-80.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1994]Annu Rev Biochem. 1996; 65():503-35.
[Annu Rev Biochem. 1996]Plant Cell. 1996 Oct; 8(10):1885-98.
[Plant Cell. 1996]Plant J. 1996 Jul; 10(1):23-32.
[Plant J. 1996]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 11; 96(10):5856-61.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Oct; 13(10):1053-70.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999 Aug; 2(4):301-4.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999]Plant Cell. 1992 Oct; 4(10):1199-211.
[Plant Cell. 1992]Plant J. 1994 Aug; 6(2):241-9.
[Plant J. 1994]Plant Cell. 1995 Jan; 7(1):43-55.
[Plant Cell. 1995]Plant J. 1993 Oct; 4(4):727-33.
[Plant J. 1993]Plant Cell. 1994 Feb; 6(2):201-13.
[Plant Cell. 1994]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Oct; 13(10):1053-70.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000]J Biol Chem. 1991 Nov 5; 266(31):21138-44.
[J Biol Chem. 1991]Endocrinology. 1997 Oct; 138(10):4199-206.
[Endocrinology. 1997]J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Feb; 33(2):229-34.
[J Pediatr Surg. 1998]Int Immunol. 1998 Sep; 10(9):1377-84.
[Int Immunol. 1998]EMBO J. 1994 Nov 1; 13(21):5099-112.
[EMBO J. 1994]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Oct; 13(10):1053-70.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000]Plant Cell. 2000 Sep; 12(9):1647-66.
[Plant Cell. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 11; 96(10):5856-61.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Oct; 13(10):1053-70.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999 Aug; 2(4):301-4.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999]Plant J. 2000 Jun; 22(6):531-41.
[Plant J. 2000]Plant Mol Biol. 1991 Sep; 17(3):335-49.
[Plant Mol Biol. 1991]Plant Cell. 1995 Jan; 7(1):43-55.
[Plant Cell. 1995]Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Jul 25; 19(14):4008.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1991]Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Jan; 30(1):135-47.
[Plant Mol Biol. 1996]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996 Jan 26; 218(3):916-23.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 11; 96(10):5856-61.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Oct; 13(10):1053-70.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000]Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1; 25(17):3389-402.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1997]Genomics. 1997 Nov 15; 46(1):24-36.
[Genomics. 1997]Plant Physiol. 1998 Aug; 117(4):1325-32.
[Plant Physiol. 1998]Plant Physiol. 2000 Aug; 123(4):1387-98.
[Plant Physiol. 2000]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Oct; 13(10):1053-70.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000]Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11; 22(22):4673-80.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1994]Genomics. 1997 Nov 15; 46(1):24-36.
[Genomics. 1997]Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11; 22(22):4673-80.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1994]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Oct; 13(10):1053-70.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Oct; 13(10):1053-70.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000]Plant Physiol. 2000 Aug; 123(4):1387-98.
[Plant Physiol. 2000]Science. 1997 Jan 24; 275(5299):527-30.
[Science. 1997]Plant Cell. 2000 Sep; 12(9):1647-66.
[Plant Cell. 2000]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Oct; 13(10):1053-70.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Oct; 13(10):1053-70.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000]Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Oct; 13(10):1053-70.
[Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000]