![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology Detection of Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Yersinia pestis by Fluorogenic PCR Using the LightCycler Department of Bacterial Diseases, Division of Communicable Diseases and Immunology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 *Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Bacterial Diseases, WRAIR, 503 Robert Grant Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20910. Phone: (301)-319–9388. Fax: (301) 319-9123. E-mail: Luther.Lindler/at/na.amedd.army.mil. Received May 7, 2001; Revisions requested July 9, 2001; Accepted July 26, 2001. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract We have developed a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based assay to detect ciprofloxacin resistant (Cpr) mutants of the biothreat agent Yersinia pestis. We selected spontaneous mutants of the attenuated Y. pestis KIM 5 strain that were resistant to a ciprofloxacin (CIP) concentration of at least 1 μg/ml. DNA sequencing of gyrA encoded by 65 of these mutants revealed that all isolates contained one of four different point mutations within the quinolone resistance-determining region of gyrA. We developed a FRET-based assay that detected all of these mutations by using a single pair of fluorescent probes with sequences complementary to the wild-type Y. pestis gyrA sequence. Melting peak analysis revealed that the probe-PCR product hybrid was less stable when amplification occurred from any of the four mutant templates. This instability resulted in the PCR product obtained from the Cpr Y. pestis strains displaying a 4 to 11°C shift in probe melting temperature. Following optimization of the reaction conditions, we were able to detect approximately 10 pg of purified wild-type template DNA or the presence of approximately 4 CFU of wild-type Y. pestis KIM 5 or Cpr mutants in crude lysates. Taken together, our results demonstrate the utility of FRET-based assays for detection of Cpr mutants of Y. pestis. This method is both sensitive and rapid. Resistance to antibiotics has become a major concern for the medical community over the past several years (13, 14, 16). Many organisms have become resistant to the common “drug of choice” used to treat the disease. A few examples are methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (18), and multiple-drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (19), as well as organisms causing many enteric diseases. One of the current antibiotics that is effective in treating bacterial infectious diseases is ciprofloxacin (CIP), a fluorinated quinolone that blocks DNA replication through inhibition of gyrase activity (2, 24). Resistance to CIP does occur and is usually mediated by point mutations in DNA gyrases or, less commonly, through membrane alterations that reduce drug entry into the bacteria (28). A critical piece of information necessary for the treatment of any bacterial disease is the antibiotic sensitivity profile of the infectious agent. Classically the sensitivity profile has been determined by growth of the organism in the presence of the antibiotic either in agar diffusion assays or by incubation of the organism in various concentrations of the drug for determination of the MIC. Both of these methods depend on growth of the bacterium after its initial isolation and are therefore time-consuming. DNA probe-based detection of antibiotic resistance offers the potential for increased speed. Among DNA-based techniques, PCR offers the best opportunity for speed, sensitivity, and specificity. Recently it has become possible to couple PCR with real-time detection of the amplification product by use of fluorescent probes, thus eliminating the necessity to analyze the reaction product by gel electrophoresis. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) is one of the available chemistries that can be used to detect the PCR product in these reactions. Roche Diagnostics has adopted this chemistry for its “Hybridization Probes” technology (5). Two DNA probes are used to bind to the amplification product when FRET chemistry is used to specifically detect the amplification product. The two light-activated molecules are positioned in close proximity at the 3′ and 5′ termini of the probes such that fluorescence increases as more PCR product accumulates and the two labeled probes bind next to each other. The increase in antibiotic resistance coupled with the threat of modification of agents of biological warfare have prompted us to develop a hybridization probe assay for the detection of CIP resistance (Cpr) in Yersinia pestis. We chose Y. pestis as a model for our initial development of a Cpr assay for three reasons. First, it is the etiologic agent of a disease that has high potential for use as a biological terrorism or biological warfare agent (27). Second, it is likely that any biological used as a weapon would be made antibiotic resistant. Third, Y. pestis is relatively slow growing, and therefore the increased speed of DNA-based antibiotic resistance detection would improve our ability to properly treat infected individuals. Although our development of the assay used Y. pestis as a model, the method should be broadly applicable to the detection of antibiotic resistance encoded by point mutations in other organisms. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cultivation of bacteria, isolation of Cpr mutants, and antibiotic sensitivity testing. The bacterium used in this study was an avirulent, pigmentation-negative (pgm-negative) mutant of Y. pestis KIM 5 and was obtained from Susan Straley, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky. Bacteria were grown on brain heart infusion agar (BHI; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) plates for 48 h at 30°C or overnight in BHI broth at 30°C with aeration. After cultivation, the bacteria were collected, washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (150 mM NaCl, 1.7 mM KH2PO4, 5 mM Na2PO4 [pH 7.4]) and suspended to yield a concentration of 1011 CFU/ml. For selection of Cpr mutants, a 100-μl sample of washed bacteria was plated on BHI agar plates containing 1 to 10 μg of CIP (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany)/ml. Cpr mutants appeared after 48 to 72 h of incubation at 30°C. Colonies were purified by streaking on fresh BHI agar plates containing the appropriate concentration of CIP. The MIC for CIP was determined by using E Test (AB Biodisk, Piscataway, N.J.) antibiotic strips containing a continuous gradient of CIP. The E Test was performed by spreading 100 μl of bacterial culture onto BHI agar plates without antibiotic. After 48 h of incubation at 30°C, the MIC was read according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA isolation, gene amplification, and sequencing. Total-cell DNA was extracted from 5-ml cultures of Y. pestis or Cpr mutants with the Puregene DNA Isolation Kit (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.). Initially primers to amplify the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) (30) of gyrA were selected from the published Escherichia coli sequence (GenBank accession number AE000312) (3) using Primerselect software (Lasergene, Madison, Wis.). PCR amplification primers gyrA51 and gyrA31 were ATGAGCGACCTTGCGAGAG and TGTTCCATCAGCCCTTCAATG, respectively. We used PCR and direct DNA sequencing to identify Y. pestis gyrA mutations. PCR was carried out with AmpliTaq Gold (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's directions. Initial activation of AmpliTaq Gold and denaturation of template DNA were carried out at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, with a final extension step of 72°C for 7 min. Amplification products were examined for size and purity by fractionation of a 10-μl sample on 1.5% agarose gels or 10% polyacrylamide gels (Novex Corporation, San Diego, Calif.). PCR products were purified for automated DNA sequencing with a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.). Nucleotide sequence determination was performed by the dideoxy chain-termination method using the Applied Biosystems International (ABI, Foster City, Calif.) PRISM dichloRhodamine Dye Terminator Sequencing Kit with AmpliTaq DNA polymerase. DNA sequencing reactions were analyzed on an ABI 377XL automated DNA sequencher. Sequence data were edited and assembled into contiguous sequences using the Sequencher program (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, Mich.). The Y. pestis KIM 5 wild-type gyrA nucleotide sequence was determined using the gyrA51 and gyrA31 primers used in the initial PCR. The DNA sequences of the mutant gyrA genes were determined using oligonucleotide primers gyrA51seq and gyrA31seq, which had the sequences AAATAACACCGGTCAACATC and ATATAAGCCAGACAGCCATCA, respectively. Template DNA for sequencing of the Y. pestis gyrA mutants was prepared by using 2.5-μl boiled overnight bacterial culture as the template in a 50-μl PCR mixture with gyrA51 and gyrA31 as the primers. The purified PCR product obtained from the mutants was sequenced as described above for wild-type Y. pestis gyrA. The QRDR regions of Y. pestis gyrB and parC were amplified using oligonucleotide primer pairs GyrB51 (TCGAATTCTTATGACTCCTCCAG)–GyrB31 (CAATACCGTCTTTTTCAGTGGAG) and ParC53 (GACCGTGCGTTGCCGTTTATTGG)–ParC39 (TTGGCTAAGTGGCGGAGTTTC). These primers were selected by using the E. coli GyrB (GenBank accession number P06982) and ParC (P20083) protein sequences (3) to search the Y. pestis CO92 genome database at http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/Y_pestis/blast_server.shtml (1). Contiguous sequences that could encode proteins 78% identical to GyrB and 80% identical to ParC over the entire length of the E. coli proteins were found in the Y. pestis CO92 genome database. The contiguous DNA sequences from the genome database were used to obtain the potential coding regions for Y. pestis KIM 5 GyrB and ParC. FRET probe detection of Cpr mutants. Y. pestis Cpr mutants were detected using hybridization probe (FRET) reactions with the LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The primers for hybridization probe reactions were LC3 (GATTATGCGATGTCCGTTATTGTC) and LC4 (GAAGTTACCCTGCCCATCCAC). Primers LC3 and LC4 were designed using Primerselect (Lasergene). Sequence-specific hybridization probes were probe 1 (GCATGGTGACAGCGCGGTC-fluorescein) and probe 2 (Lightcycler Red 640-ACGACACTATCGTGCGTATGGCCCA-PO4). The probes were chosen using Primerselect (Lasergene) software according to the guidelines suggested by Roche Diagnostics. Operon Technologies, Inc. (Alameda, Calif.), or Synthegen LLC (Houston, Tex.) synthesized the fluorescent-labeled FRET probes. Mutant sequence detection was performed with primers LC3 and LC4 plus probe 1 and probe 2 and the Roche Diagnostics DNA Master Hybridization Probes kit. The optimized reaction mixture contained template DNA in 2 μl of water, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 μM primers LC3 and LC4, 0.4 μM (each) probe1 and probe2, and 1× LightCycler DNA Master Hybridization Probes buffer, according to the manufacturer's directions (Roche Diagnostics). Crude lysates of Cpr mutants were analyzed by a simple growth and boiling procedure. A 2-μl portion of the clarified supernatant obtained from crude boiled lysates was used as a template in the hybridization probe Cpr detection assay as described above. All PCRs were performed on a LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics) using channel F2 (640 nm). The Y. pestis gyrA target sequences were amplified by a single incubation at 95°C for 1 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 0 s, 58°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 15 s. The melting curve for the annealing of the PCR product with the FRET probes was determined by monitoring the fluorescence of channel F2 from 40 to 95°C with a temperature transition rate of 0.1°C per s. Lightcycler amplification results were verified by electrophoresis of 10 μl of the PCR product on 1.5% agarose gels. Data were analyzed with LightCycler software, version 3.1, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The DNA sequences of wild-type Y. pestis KIM 5 and of the four examples of Y. pestis KIM 5 Cpr gyrA point mutants have been deposited in GenBank and assigned accession numbers AF217736 through AF217740. The Y. pestis gyrB and parC sequences have been given GenBank accession numbers AF221694 and AF221695, respectively. To promote ease of analysis and comparison with previous studies, we have adopted the convention of using the E. coli GyrA (GenBank accession number P09097) numbering throughout this paper when referring to specific amino acid residues. RESULTS Isolation of Cpr Y. pestis mutants. We performed 11 independent experiments to isolate Cpr mutants. The average mutation frequency observed for all of these experiments was 2.6 × 10−10. These mutant isolations resulted in 682 Cpr Y. pestis KIM 5 strains. We chose 65 mutants at random for further single-colony isolation and characterization. We performed initial experiments to determine the influence of plating cell density on the CIP MIC observed by using E Test antibiotic sensitivity strips. Inoculation of BHI agar plates with approximately 107 or 108 cells produced MICs that were similar to each other. However, inoculation of BHI agar plates for the E Test with cell concentrations above or below 107 or 108 CFU produced significantly higher or lower observed MICs, respectively. Accordingly, we chose to plate Y. pestis KIM 5 at 107 CFU per plate in order to determine the observed MIC for CIP in all later experiments. Our observed CIP MIC for the wild-type Y. pestis strain KIM 5 was 0.026 μg/ml. For all the Cpr mutants, MICs at least 40 times greater than that for the wild type, i.e., between 1.1 and 4.6 μg/ml, were observed (Fig. (Fig.1B).1
Sequencing of wild-type Y. pestis and Cpr mutants. We obtained a single, approximately 630-bp fragment of DNA from the Y. pestis KIM 5 genome using oligonucleotide primers gyrA51 and gyrA31 in PCRs. After determination of the sequence of this fragment on both strands of DNA, a BLASTN (1) search of GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/blast.cgi) revealed that our sequence had a high degree of homology (probability value, 1e−137) with Serratia marcescens gyrA (GenBank accession number AF052260) (26). The final 492-bp Y. pestis KIM 5 gyrA sequence was 88% identical to S. marcescens gyrA at the nucleotide level, suggesting that it was the plague homologue of the gyrase A gene. Further evidence was obtained by performing protein searches of the nonredundant GenBank database. The protein database search revealed that the putative protein product translated from our DNA sequence was 96% identical over a 164-amino-acid overlap with S. marcescens GyrA (AAC68576) (26) as well as many other E. coli GyrA homologues. Our analysis of the predicted Y. pestis KIM 5 GyrA sequence obtained from the PCR product using Megalign (Lasergene) revealed that the nucleotide sequence changes encoded six conservative amino acid substitutions compared to S. marcescens GyrA. Our results revealed that the Y. pestis KIM 5 GyrA sequence within the QRDR was identical to that of E. coli. Accordingly, we designated our sequence Y. pestis gyrA. We amplified the DNA encoding the QRDR from all of the Cpr Y. pestis mutants we isolated using the gyrA51–gyrA31 primer pair. The DNA sequences for each of these mutants were determined on both strands using oligonucleotide primers gyrA51seq and gyrA51seq. Each of the mutants revealed a single-nucleotide change in the QRDR of gyrA, and these substitutions belonged to one of four groups (Fig. (Fig.1A).1 Since other gene products such as GyrB (8, 12, 31) and ParC (6, 11, 20) have been shown to be involved in resistance to CIP, we amplified the QRDRs of these genes from a randomly selected group of our Cpr mutants and compared the DNA sequences for both Y. pestis KIM 5 gyrB and parC. The DNA sequences of the wild type Y. pestis KIM 5 gyrB and parC loci were determined as described in Materials and Methods. In order to confirm that the genes we amplified did encode the expected proteins, our nucleotide sequences were translated into predicted proteins and used to search the GenBank protein database. The protein product predicted by translation of the wild-type Y. pestis gyrB sequence was highly homologus (probability value, 1e−102) with E. coli GyrB (AAC76722) (3). The entire protein sequence predicted by translation of Y. pestis KIM 5 parC was 86% identical with the E. coli ParC sequence (P20082) (3), amino acids 12 through 394. Accordingly, the putative function of the proteins encoded by our PCR product obtained after Y. pestis gyrB and parC amplification was confirmed by protein homologies in the database. The DNA sequence of gyrB carried by 12 of our 65 Y. pestis Cpr mutants was determined from randomly selected strains regardless of observed MIC and was found to be identical with the wild-type sequence. Similarly, the parC sequence encoding the QRDR was determined for 36 of the 65 Cpr mutants and was found to be identical to the wild-type DNA sequence. Amplification and detection of gyrA in the LightCycler. We designed PCR primers and hybridization probes for detection of Y. pestis KIM 5 gyrA as shown in Fig. Fig.2.2
We tested the ability of the hybridization probe assay to detect Y. pestis gyrA sequences using purified genomic DNA as a template. Melting peak analysis revealed that the change in fluorescence with the change in time versus temperature was also proportional to the amount of template DNA used in the reaction (Fig. (Fig.3).3
FRET probe detection of Cpr gyrA DNA sequences. Using the FRET probe assay, we were able to differentiate Y. pestis KIM 5 gyrA mutants (Cpr) from wild-type (Cps) organisms. As shown in Fig. Fig.4,4
Colony assay for Cpr Y. pestis In order to test the utility of our FRET assay for identification of Cpr Y. pestis, we performed the assay on crude lysates of bacteria. Initially, we used boiled lysates from a single colony suspended in 100 μl of water as the template in these reactions without any further growth of the cells. We found that we could identify the Cpr mutants in dilutions up to and including 1,000-fold (data not shown). The minimum number of CFU we could detect in our initial FRET PCRs was approximately 500. Since our goal was to develop our assay to cover as wide a range of template concentrations as possible, we tested the effect of growing the bacteria for a short time in liquid culture on the sensitivity of the assay. We found that growth for only 3 h in BHI broth allowed us to detect the presence of Y. pestis gyrA at dilutions up to 10,000-fold as shown in Fig. Fig.5.5
DISCUSSION Although Cpr in Y. pestis is currently of no concern to public health officials, the organism is of major concern as a potential agent for biological warfare or bioterrorism (27). Given that CIP is a new-generation antibiotic under consideration for inclusion in a national antibiotic stockpile (9), a rapid method for the detection of Cpr agents of bioterrorism is highly desirable. We have developed a simple and rapid PCR assay to detect Cpr using FRET probes and the Roche Diagnostics LightCycler. The assay was able to detect four different point mutations within Y. pestis KIM 5 gyrA using a single probe pair with as few as approximately 2,100 copies of purified target sequence. Cpr Y. pestis could also be detected in crude lysates prepared from fresh colonies isolated on petri plates at levels below 10 CFU per reaction. The difference in detection level between pure and crude templates is most likely due to the tendency of Y. pestis to grow as chains under culture conditions similar to those used here (L. E. Lindler, unpublished data). Using our assay, we were able to determine if the bacteria growing on solid medium were Cpr within 4 h using melting peak analysis. Furthermore, the FRET assay was able to reliably identify Cpr Y. pestis at CFU concentrations of 4 to 40,000 per reaction. This finding is particularly important if the method is to be useful in a clinical laboratory, since the assay will identify Cpr bacteria over a wide range of template concentrations, thus reducing the possibility of false-negative reactions. Given that FRET depends on the interaction of two fluorochromes in proximity with each other, it might be expected that the location of the base mismatch within probe 1 would strongly influence the melting peak. However, our results indicate that the position of the mismatch within probe 1 does not greatly influence this stability. This fact was suggested by our observation that mutant M4 and M3 produced the largest and smallest Tm values in our FRET assay and were located only 1 bp apart. The stability of these mutant templates was especially noteworthy, since M3 and M4 are located nearest the 3′ terminus of probe 1 and therefore might be expected to decrease the excitation of probe 2. If the position of the mismatch within the probe 1 sequence were a major factor in probe-template stability, then mutants M1 and M2 (Fig. (Fig.1A)1 Currently, the standard method of determining Cpr is by agar diffusion tests. This method requires the isolation of the pathogen followed by an extra day of incubation with disks or strips. DNA-based methods for Cpr detection, such as mismatch amplification mutation assay (MAMA) combined with DNA sequencing (32) and single-stranded confirmation polymorphism (23), have been developed. All of these methods require electrophoresis of reaction products to determine if a mutant allele of a cellular gyrase is encoded by the isolate. Also, both of the techniques above require equipment that does not easily lend itself to use in a clinical laboratory environment. Most recently, Wilson et al. (29) developed a 5′ nuclease assay to detect Cpr in Campylobacter jejuni by PCR allelic discrimination (AD). These researchers were able to distinguish mutations at codon 86 by use of a pair of fluorescent probes and comparison of binding of those probes with either mutant or wild-type PCR products. Although this assay was shown to be sensitive to the femtogram level of template DNA, it has not been tested for the ability to distinguish Cpr mutants from sensitive strains using crude whole-cell lysates as we have demonstrated here. Furthermore, we believe the FRET-based assay is more applicable because the use of a single pair of FRET probes allows the detection of four different linked point mutations in gyrA. In contrast, detection of the point mutations described here would require at least five different probes to be developed for an AD assay, assuming that one wild-type probe could be paired with a probe that binds to each individual point mutation in gyrA. The mutations in Y. pestis gyrA all occurred at position 81 or 83 relative to the E. coli protein sequence. Although we did not determine the sequences of gyrB and parC for every Cpr mutant we identified, our random sampling of these gene sequences suggests that they were most probably wild type in the mutants we characterized. Specifically, the observed MICs for all of the individual members of our four mutant classes were similar, and secondary alterations in gyrB and/or parC have been shown to result in increased levels of Cpr (7, 11, 20). Taken together, our random DNA sequencing of known secondary mutation sites and our MIC data strongly suggest that the Y. pestis Cpr strains we characterized did not encode mutations in the gyrB and/or parC QRDR. Six different amino acid substitutions in E. coli GyrA have been identified in Cpr strains following in vitro selection (4, 10, 22, 30). Among our 65 Y. pestis Cpr mutants we found only two amino acid positions in GyrA that had been changed. The substitutions in Y. pestis GyrA were Gly-81 to Asp or Cys and Ser-83 to Ile or Arg. All of the amino acid substitutions we identified in Y. pestis GyrA have been found in other organisms (4, 15, 20, 23, 25, 30). Based on the results of our characterization of 65 Y. pestis Cpr mutants, the most common site of mutation in GyrA is Gly-81. Other studies have indicated that Ser-83 is the most common hotspot for changes in gyrA that result in Cpr (7, 11, 20, 21, 23, 30). The fact that Gly-81 appears to be a hotspot for mutation in Y. pestis may reflect a difference in the organism's DNA repair capabilities or a difference in the tertiary structure of GyrA. Alternatively, this finding may be due to the limited number of Cpr isolates we characterized. In summary, we have developed a pair of FRET probes that can easily detect four closely linked point mutations in Y. pestis gyrA by use of melting peak analysis. This FRET-based Cpr detection method is sensitive, reproducible, and applicable over a wide range of template concentrations. In order for this assay to be useful in a clinical laboratory setting, it should be possible to perform the analysis as quickly after initial isolation of the organism as possible. We have demonstrated that this is possible by use of crude whole-cell lysates as templates in our reactions. Further testing of specificity is planned for future experiments. However, currently we envision that the FRET assay described here could be incorporated into a general DNA-based identification panel that would include Y. pestis-specific primers. Accordingly, it may be possible in the future to identify organisms and determine their antibiotic sensitivity profiles simultaneously. The development of our FRET-based Cpr assay is a first step toward this goal. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Peter Schwartz for technical assistance. We also gratefully acknowledge the support of Erik Henchal. This work is part of the U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command Research Area Director IV sponsored programs. REFERENCES 1. Altschul S F, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E W, Lipman D J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. [PubMed] 2. Balfour J A, Faulds D. Oral ciprofloxacin: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the treatment of serious infections. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993;3:398–421. [PubMed] 3. Blattner F R, Plunkett III G, Bloch C A, Perna N T, Burland V, Riley M, Collado-Vides J, Glasner J D, Rode C K, Mayhew G F, Gregor J, Davis N W, Kirkpatrick H A, Goeden M A, Rose D J, Mau B, Shao Y. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science. 1997;277:1453–1474. [PubMed] 4. Cambau E, Bordon F, Collatz E, Gutmann L. Novel gyrA point mutation in a strain of Escherichia coli resistant to fluoroquinolones but not to nalidixic acid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1247–1252. [PubMed] 5. Caplin B E, Rasmussen R P, Bernard P S, Wittwer C T. LightCycler hybridization probes: the most direct way to monitor PCR amplification for quantitation and mutation detection. Biochemica. 1999;1:5–9. 6. Chu Y W, Houang E T, Cheng A F. Novel combination of mutations in the DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV genes in laboratory-grown fluoroquinolone-resistant Shigella flexneri mutants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:3051–3052. [PubMed] 7. Deguchi T, Fukuoka A, Yasuda M, Nakano M, Ozeki S, Kanematsu E, Nishino Y, Ishihara S, Ban Y, Kawada Y. Alterations in the GyrA subunit of DNA gyrase and the ParC subunit of topoisomerase IV in quinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:699–701. [PubMed] 8. Gensberg K, Jin Y F, Piddock L J. A novel gyrB mutation in a fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolate of Salmonella typhimurium. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995;132:57–60. . (Erratum, 137:293, 1996.). [PubMed] 9. Grabenstein J, Downs K, Dotson D. Extraordinary infections: a focus on bioterrorism. J Am Pharm Assoc (Washington, DC). 2000;40:S36–S37. [PubMed] 10. Hallett P, Maxwell A. Novel quinolone resistance mutations of the Escherichia coli DNA gyrase A protein: enzymatic analysis of the mutant proteins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:335–340. [PubMed] 11. Heisig P. Genetic evidence for a role of parC mutations in development of high-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:879–885. [PubMed] 12. Heisig P. High-level fluoroquinolone resistance in a Salmonella typhimurium isolate due to alterations in both gyrA and gyrB genes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993;32:367–377. [PubMed] 13. Jack D B. Drug-resistant bacteria: responding to the infectious disease crisis. Mol Med Today. 1996;2:499–502. [PubMed] 14. Jones R N, Pfaller M A. Bacterial resistance: a worldwide problem. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998;31:379–388. [PubMed] 15. Korten V, Huang W M, Murray B E. Analysis by PCR and direct DNA sequencing of gyrA mutations associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:2091–2094. [PubMed] 16. Koshland D E., Jr The biological warfare of the future. Science. 1994;264:327. [PubMed] 17. Lucier T S, Brubaker R R. Determination of genome size, macrorestriction pattern polymorphism, and nonpigmentation-specific deletion in Yersinia pestis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:2078–2086. [PubMed] 18. Michel M, Gutmann L. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci: therapeutic realities and possibilities. Lancet. 1997;349:1901–1906. [PubMed] 19. Moss A R, Alland D, Telzak E, Hewlett D, Jr, Sharp V, Chiliade P, LaBombardi V, Kabus D, Hanna B, Palumbo L, Brudney K, Weltman A, Stoeckle K, Chirgwin K, Simberkoff M, Moghazeh S, Eisner W, Lutfey M, Kreiswirth B. A city-wide outbreak of a multiple-drug-resistant strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in New York. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1997;1:115–121. [PubMed] 20. Mouneimne H, Robert J, Jarlier V, Cambau E. Type II topoisomerase mutations in ciprofloxacin-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:62–66. [PubMed] 21. Ruiz J, Marco F, Goni P, Gallardo F, Mensa J, Trilla A, Jimenez de Anta T, Vila J. High frequency of mutations at codon 83 of the gyrA gene of quinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995;36:737–738. [PubMed] 22. Swanberg S L, Wang J C. Cloning and sequencing of the Escherichia coli gyrA gene coding for the A subunit of DNA gyrase. J Mol Biol. 1987;197:729–736. [PubMed] 23. Takenouchi T, Sakagawa E, Sugawara M. Detection of gyrA mutations among 335 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated in Japan and their susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:406–409. [PubMed] 24. Thomson C J. The global epidemiology of resistance to ciprofloxacin and the changing nature of antibiotic resistance: a 10 year perspective. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999;43(Suppl. A):31–40. [PubMed] 25. Truong Q C, Nguyen Van J C, Shlaes D, Gutmann L, Moreau N J. A novel, double mutation in DNA gyrase A of Escherichia coli conferring resistance to quinolone antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:85–90. [PubMed] 26. Weigel L M, Steward C D, Tenover F C. gyrA mutations associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in eight species of Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:2661–2667. [PubMed] 27. Weller R E, Lyu C W, Wolters C, Atlas R M. Universities and the biological and toxin weapons convention. ASM News. 1999;65:403–409. 28. Wiedemann B, Heisig P. Mechanisms of quinolone resistance. Infection. 1994;22:S73–S79. [PubMed] 29. Wilson D L, Abner S R, Newman T C, Mansfield L S, Linz J E. Identification of ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter jejuni by use of a fluorogenic PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:3971–3978. [PubMed] 30. Yoshida H, Bogaki M, Nakamura M, Nakamura S. Quinolone resistance-determining region in the DNA gyrase gyrA gene of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:1271–1272. [PubMed] 31. Yoshida H, Bogaki M, Nakamura M, Yamanaka L M, Nakamura S. Quinolone resistance-determining region in the DNA gyrase gyrB gene of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:1647–1650. [PubMed] 32. Zirnstein G, Li Y, Swaminathan B, Angulo F. Ciprofloxacin resistance in Campylobacter jejuni isolates: detection of gyrA resistance mutations by mismatch amplification mutation assay PCR and DNA sequence analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:3276–3280. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||
Mol Med Today. 1996 Dec; 2(12):499-502.
[Mol Med Today. 1996]Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Jun; 31(2):379-88.
[Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998]Science. 1994 Apr 15; 264(5157):327.
[Science. 1994]Lancet. 1997 Jun 28; 349(9069):1901-6.
[Lancet. 1997]Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1997 Apr; 1(2):115-21.
[Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1997]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Jun; 34(6):1271-2.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990]Science. 1997 Sep 5; 277(5331):1453-62.
[Science. 1997]Science. 1997 Sep 5; 277(5331):1453-62.
[Science. 1997]J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5; 215(3):403-10.
[J Mol Biol. 1990]J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5; 215(3):403-10.
[J Mol Biol. 1990]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Oct; 42(10):2661-7.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998]FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995 Oct 1; 132(1-2):57-60.
[FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995]J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Sep; 32(3):367-77.
[J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Aug; 35(8):1647-50.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Nov; 42(11):3051-2.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Apr; 40(4):879-85.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996]J Bacteriol. 1992 Apr; 174(7):2078-86.
[J Bacteriol. 1992]J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2000 Sep-Oct; 40(5 Suppl 1):S36-7.
[J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2000]J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Oct; 37(10):3276-80.
[J Clin Microbiol. 1999]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Feb; 43(2):406-9.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999]J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Nov; 38(11):3971-8.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2000]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Mar; 41(3):699-701.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Apr; 40(4):879-85.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Jan; 43(1):62-6.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Jun; 37(6):1247-52.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Feb; 35(2):335-40.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991]J Mol Biol. 1987 Oct 20; 197(4):729-36.
[J Mol Biol. 1987]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Jun; 34(6):1271-2.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Sep; 38(9):2091-4.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994]Science. 1997 Sep 5; 277(5331):1453-62.
[Science. 1997]