![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology Note Dissemination of a Chloramphenicol- and Tetracycline-Resistant but Penicillin-Susceptible Invasive Clone of Serotype 5 Streptococcus pneumoniae in Colombia Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras,1 and Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Monte da Caparica,3 Portugal; Grupo de Microbiología, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Santa Fe de Bogotá, Colombia2; and The Rockefeller University, New York, New York4 *Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Microbiology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Ave., New York, NY 10021. Phone: (212) 327-8277. Fax: (212) 327-8688. E-mail: lencash/at/rockvax.rockefeller.edu. Received December 28, 1998; Revisions requested February 18, 1999; Accepted March 24, 1999. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract A national surveillance conducted in Colombia between 1994 and 1996 identified serotype 5 Streptococcus pneumoniae as the second most frequent cause of invasive disease in children younger than 5 years of age. All 43 serotype 5 isolates collected during this period were shown to be susceptible to penicillin, erythromycin, cefotaxime, and vancomycin, but most (38 of 43, or 88%) were highly resistant to chloramphenicol. In order to clarify a possible genetic relatedness among these isolates, additional microbiological and molecular characterizations were performed. Most (40 of 43, or 93%) of the isolates were found to be resistant to tetracycline. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns of chromosomal DNAs revealed that all the 43 isolates were closely related and that 38 of the 43 isolates were representatives of a “Colombian clone” of S. pneumoniae isolates which were recovered throughout the 3-year surveillance period from patients in 13 hospitals located in five Colombian cities. Isolates belonging to this Colombian clone were resistant to chloramphenicol and tetracycline, hybridized with the cat and tetM DNA probes in the same 340-kb SmaI fragment, and had identical PFGE patterns after both SmaI and ApaI digestions. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading bacterial cause of childhood pneumonia in the developing world (10). It is estimated that more than 1 million children die each year from pneumococcal pneumonia; approximately one-half of them are less than 1 year old (15). The high incidence of pneumococcal infections and the increasing emergence of drug-resistant isolates are the major reasons for the establishment of surveillance programs. Since 1994, an epidemiological surveillance study has been conducted in six Latin American countries in order to identify S. pneumoniae causing invasive disease in children less than 5 years old (10, 21). The study is part of an initiative (Regional System of Vaccines) by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). The study has already provided important information on the distribution of invasive pneumococcal serotypes among children less than 5 years old, on antibiotic susceptibility patterns (21), and on the genetic relationships among the isolates with diminished susceptibility to penicillin (36). In particular, the work conducted with 324 Colombian pneumococcal isolates showed that the most invasive serotypes in children were, in decreasing order of frequency, 14, 5, 23F, 1, and 6B (5). Diminished susceptibility to penicillin was found in 12% of the isolates and was associated with serotypes 23F (53.8%), 14 (25.6%), 6B (7.7%), 9V (5.1%), 19F (5.1%), and 34 (2.6%) (5). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of these isolates identified multidrug-resistant epidemic international clones associated with serotypes 23F and 14, among others (6). Interestingly, all 43 of the serotype 5 isolates collected during this period and representing the second most prevalent group of pneumococci causing invasive disease in Colombian children were susceptible to penicillin. The aim of the follow-up study described here was to characterize the Colombian serotype 5 isolates for epidemiological and genetic relatedness. The study was carried out at the Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica as part of a collaborative project between the Instituto Nacional de Salud in Colombia and the Center for Molecular Epidemiology in Portugal (35). Bacterial isolates. Forty-three Colombian S. pneumoniae serotype 5 invasive isolates were recovered between March 1994 and December 1996 from children less than 5 years old. The isolates were selected on the basis of the uniform criteria established in the PAHO epidemiological surveillance study conducted in six Latin American countries, including Colombia (5). Most of the S. pneumoniae isolates were collected in hospitals located in the three most developed cities in the country, based on the infrastructure of their health services: 14 isolates were recovered from 13 hospitals located in Bogotá, 10 isolates were from 3 hospitals in Medellín, and 15 isolates were from 3 hospitals in Cali. Two provincial towns, Manizales and Pereira, yielded two isolates each. The pneumococcal isolates were recovered from 40 patients, 33 with pneumonia and 7 with meningitis. All isolates were from sterile sites: blood (27 isolates), pleural fluid (9 isolates), and cerebrospinal fluid (7 isolates). From three patients diagnosed with pneumonia, S. pneumoniae was isolated from both blood and pleural fluid. Eight other serotype 5 isolates were also included in the study for comparison: three isolates from Argentina and four isolates from Brazil were resistant only to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ); the single isolate from the United States was susceptible to all antibacterial agents tested. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. MICs of penicillin G, ceftriaxone, and TMP-SMZ were determined by the broth microdilution method with cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) containing 3% lysed horse blood (26). Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) containing 5% sheep blood was used to determine MICs of chloramphenicol and erythromycin by the E test (20) and to determine sensitivity to tetracycline and vancomycin by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method (26). MICs and inhibition zones were interpreted according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines (26). S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was used as the control strain. PFGE. Chromosomal DNA was prepared according to a published procedure (33). Chromosomal DNA was digested with 20 U of SmaI or 20 U of ApaI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass.) and PFGE was performed with a CHEF DR-II apparatus (Bio-Rad, Birmingham, United Kingdom) for 23 h. The assay parameters were as follows: initial pulse, 5 s; final pulse, 35 s; voltage, 6 V/cm; and temperature, 13°C. Standard methodologies were used for staining and photographing the gels (30). Strain R6 of S. pneumoniae and a PFGE lambda marker (New England Biolabs) were used as molecular weight standards. The macrorestriction profiles were analyzed by visual inspection of the patterns by use of the criteria of Tenover et al. (34): isolates showing six or fewer fragment differences were considered subtypes of a major pattern. Southern hybridization with chloramphenicol and tetracycline probes. Gels were transferred to Hybond N+ membranes (Amersham International, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom) by use of a vacuum blotter (VaguGene XL; Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) as previously described (8). A 338-bp conserved region internal to the cat genes belonging to both catpC194 and catpC221 classes and a 1,080-bp region internal to the tetM gene were prepared as previously described (24, 25, 27). For probe labeling and hybridization, an enhanced chemiluminescence nonradioactive labeling kit (RPN3001; Amersham, Birmingham, United Kingdom) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Table 1 summarizes the relevant characteristics of the Colombian isolates, including isolation date, geographic origin, antibiotic susceptibility patterns, PFGE patterns, and results of hybridization of SmaI-digested DNA from PFGE gels with DNA probes. An earlier study (5) had already established that of the 43 serotype 5 invasive pneumococcal isolates, all were susceptible to penicillin, erythromycin, cefotaxime, and vancomycin; the majority (88%) showed resistance to chloramphenicol. Chloramphenicol is one of the antimicrobial agents of choice for the treatment of invasive diseases in children in Colombia (5). Additional susceptibility testing demonstrated that most of the 43 isolates, including the 38 chloramphenicol-resistant isolates, were also resistant to tetracycline, and a variable proportion were resistant to TMP-SMZ. Three of the serotype 5 isolates (CLB 32, CLB 33, and CLB 35) were susceptible to all antimicrobial agents tested, and two isolates (CLB 34 and CLB 43) were resistant only to tetracycline and not to chloramphenicol. Differences in resistance to TMP-SMZ among the serotype 5 isolates listed in Table 1 may reflect differences in local antibiotic use. A single Ile 100-to-Leu mutation in dihydrofolate reductase is known to be sufficient for trimethoprim resistance in S. pneumoniae (1), and evidence for the rapid emergence of resistance upon the introduction of TMP-SMZ into clinical use has been described (17).
All 38 serotype 5 strains showing resistance to both tetracycline and chloramphenicol represented a “Colombian clone”: a homogeneous group of S. pneumoniae isolates which were susceptible to penicillin and erythromycin, had a common PFGE pattern (X1) after SmaI restriction (Fig. (Fig.1A),1
Because of the genetic homogeneity of the 38 isolates representing the Colombian clone, a group of additional serotype 5 S. pneumoniae isolates with different antibiotic susceptibility profiles and different geographic origins were also examined by PFGE after digestion of the chromosomal DNAs with SmaI and ApaI. This group of serotype 5 pneumococci included four Colombian isolates (CLB 32, CLB 33, CLB 35, and CLB 43), which are listed in Table 1, four isolates from Brazil, three isolates from Argentina, and one isolate from the United States. Three of the four Colombian isolates (CLB 32, CLB 33, and CLB 35) were susceptible to both chloramphenicol and tetracycline, while isolate CLB 43 was resistant to tetracycline only (Table 1). The four Brazilian and three Argentinian isolates were susceptible to both chloramphenicol and tetracycline but were resistant to TMP-SMZ; the U.S. isolate was susceptible to all antimicrobial agents tested. A comparison of the PFGE patterns of these additional serotype 5 isolates to the uniform PFGE pattern characteristic of the Colombian clone is shown for SmaI digestion in Fig. Fig.11
Serotype 5 S. pneumoniae was common in the United States and Europe in the 1930s (16), but since then, its frequency of isolation has declined, leading to its virtual disappearance (14). In Spain, serotype 5 pneumococci ranked 6th in order of frequency between 1979 and 1989 but only 13th in 1990 to 1996 (12, 13). Antibiotic resistance in isolates of this serotype was seen most often for tetracycline, sometimes associated with resistance to chloramphenicol or general susceptibility to all antimicrobial agents. Penicillin resistance has been rare among serotype 5 isolates (for a review, see references 13 and 22). In contrast to the findings in Europe, the United States, and Canada, serotype 5 (and serotype 1) remained the most frequent pneumococcal serotype in Africa (3, 7, 9) and India (19) in the 1980s and 1990s, and the continued importance of serotypes 5 and 1 in other developing countries, including countries in South America, was also documented in recent studies (31, 32). In particular, serotype 5 S. pneumoniae isolates were found to be the second most frequent causative agents of invasive disease in children in Argentina (28, 29), Chile (23), and Uruguay (18) and were ranked third in Brazil (4) and ninth in Mexico (11). These observations led to the suggestion that serotype 5 should be included in a future protein conjugate vaccine (21, 32). In conclusion, the observations described demonstrate that the great majority of serotype 5 pneumococcal isolates currently in circulation in Colombia represent a unique Colombian clone, with most isolates expressing resistance to tetracycline and chloramphenicol but remaining susceptible to penicillin. Since these isolates were all from sterile sites and also included closely related serotype 5 bacteria susceptible to all antimicrobial agents tested, this S. pneumoniae lineage appears to carry all virulence factors necessary to invade the human host. It is important to determine the degree of dispersion of this clone throughout Latin America and in other countries where this serotype is frequently isolated. Acknowledgments Support for this work was provided by the CEM/NET initiative (CEM/NET Project 31 from IBET, contract PRAXIS XXI-2/2.1/BIO/1154/95, and contract PECS/C/SAU/145/95 from JNICT) and by a grant from Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian awarded to H. de Lencastre. R. Sá-Leão was supported by grant BD/4259/96 from PRAXIS XXI from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia. The work of M. Tamayo in Portugal was supported by Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon, Portugal; Support for M. Tamayo in Colombia came from PAHO, the Canadian Agency for International Development, and the Instituto Nacional de Salud, Santa Fe de Bogotá, Colombia. We acknowledge Clara Inês Agudelo and María Victoria Ovalle from the Instituto Nacional de Salud and Alejandra Corso from the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Buenos Aires, Argentina, for stimulating discussions. We express our gratitude to Alexander Tomasz of The Rockefeller University, New York, N.Y., for help in the interpretation of data and writing of the manuscript. Idalina Bonfim from Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Oeiras, Portugal, provided technical assistance in some of the antibiotic susceptibility testing. REFERENCES 1. Adrian P V, Klugman K P. Mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase gene of trimethoprim-resistant isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2406–2413. [PubMed] 2. Ayoubi P, Kilic A O, Vijayakumar M N. Tn5253, the pneumococcal omega (cat tet) BM6001 element, is a composite structure of two conjugative transposons, Tn5251 and Tn5252. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:1617–1622. [PubMed] 3. Bogaerts J, Lepage P, Taelman H, Rouvroy D, Batungwanayo J, Kestelyn P, Hitimana D G, Van de Perre P, Vandepitte J, Verbist L, Verhaegen J. Antimicrobial susceptibility and serotype distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Rwanda, 1984–1990. J Infect. 1993;27:157–168. [PubMed] 4. Brandileone M C, Vieira V S, Casagrande S T, Zanella R C, Guerra M L, Bokermann S, de Moraes J C, Baldacci E R, Chamone C B, Oliveira M A, de Matos D G, Arruda T M, Coelho M F, D’Avila S M, dos Santos A R, di Fabio J L. the Pneumococcal Study Group in Brazil for the SIREVA Project. Prevalence of serotypes and antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains isolated from Brazilian children with invasive infections. Microb Drug Resist. 1997;3:141–146. [PubMed] 5. Castañeda E, Leal A L, Castillo O, de la Hoz F, Vela M C, Arango M, Trujillo H, Levy A, Gama M E, Calle M, Valencia M L, Parra W, Agudelo N, Mejía G I, Jaramillo S, Montoya F, Porras H, Sánchez A, Saa D, di Fabio J L, Homma A. the Pneumococcal Study Group in Colombia. Distribution of capsular types and antimicrobial susceptibility of invasive isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Colombian children. Microb Drug Resist. 1997;3:147–152. [PubMed] 6. Castañeda E, Penuela I, Vela M C, Tomasz A. the Colombian Pneumococcal Study Group. Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Colombia: presence of international epidemic clones. Microb Drug Resist. 1998;4:233–239. [PubMed] 7. Dagan R, Engelhard D, Piccard E. the Israeli Pediatric Bacteremia and Meningitis Group. Epidemiology of invasive childhood pneumococcal infections in Israel. JAMA. 1992;268:3328–3332. [PubMed] 8. De Lencastre H, Couto I, Santos I, Melo-Cristino J, Torres-Pereira A, Tomasz A. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in a Portuguese hospital: characterization of clonal types by a combination of DNA typing methods. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994;13:64–73. [PubMed] 9. Denis F A, Greewood B D, Rey J I, Prince-David M, Mboup S, Lloyd-Evans N, Williams K, Benbachir I, El Ndaghri N, Hansman D, Omanga V, Krubwa K, Duchassin M, Perrin J. Etude multicentrique des sérotypes de pneumocoques en Afrique. Bull Org Mondiale de la Santé 1983;61:517–524. 10. Di Fabio J L, Homma A, de Quadros C. Pan American Health Organization Epidemiological Surveillance Network for Streptococcus pneumoniae. Microb Drug Resist. 1997;3:131–133. [PubMed] 11. Echaniz-Aviles G, Velazquez-Meza M E, Carnalla-Barajas M N, Soto-Noguerón A, Solórzano-Santos F, Pérez Miravete A, Gatica-Marquina R, di Fabio J L. Antimicrobial susceptibilities and capsular types of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated in children in Mexico City. Microb Drug Resist. 1997;3:153–157. [PubMed] 12. Fenoll A, Bourgon M, Muñoz R, Vicioso D, Casal J. Serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates causing systemic infections in Spain, 1979–1989. Rev Infect Dis. 1991;13:56–60. [PubMed] 13. Fenoll A, Jado I, Vicioso D, Perez A, Casal J. Evolution of Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes and antibiotic resistance in Spain: update (1990 to 1996). J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:3447–3454. [PubMed] 14. Finland M, Barnes M W. Changes in occurrence of capsular serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae at Boston City Hospital during selected years between 1935 and 1974. J Clin Microbiol. 1977;5:154–166. [PubMed] 15. Garenne M M, Ronsmaus C, Campbell H. The magnitude of mortality from acute respiratory infections in children under 5 years in developing countries. World Health Stat Q. 1992;45:180–191. [PubMed] 16. Heffron R. Pneumonia with special reference to pneumococcus lobar pneumonia. 1st ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: The Commonwealth Fund, Oxford University Press; 1939. 17. Henderson F W, Gilligan P H, Wait K, Goff D A. Nasopharyngeal carriage of antibiotic-resistant pneumococci by children in group day care. J Infect Dis. 1988;157:256–263. [PubMed] 18. Hortal M, Algorta G, Bianchi I, Borthagaray G, Cestau I, Camou T, Castro M, de los Santos M, Diez R, Dell’Acqua L, Galiana A, Giordano A, Giordano P, Lopez-Ghemi G, Milanese N, Mogdasy C, Palacio R, Pedreira W, Pisano A, Pivel L. Capsular type distribution and susceptibility to antibiotics of Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical strains isolated from Uruguayan children with systemic infections. Microb Drug Resist. 1997;3:159–163. [PubMed] 19. John T J, Pai R, Lalitha M K, Jesudason M V, Brahmadathan K N, Sridharan G, Steinhoff M C. Prevalence of pneumococcal serotypes in invasive diseases in southern India. Indian J Med Res. 1996;104:205–207. [PubMed] 20. Jorgensen J H, Howell A W, Maher L A. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae by using the E test. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:109–114. [PubMed] 21. Kertesz D A, di Fabio J L, Brandileone M C C, Castañeda E, Echániz-Aviles G, Heitmann I, Homma A, Hortal M, Lovgren M, Ruvinsky R O, Talbot J A, Weekes J, Spika J S. the PAHO Pneumococcal Surveillance Study Group. Invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae infection in Latin American children: results of the Pan American Health Organization Surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:1355–1361. [PubMed] 22. Klugman K P. Pneumococcal resistance to antibiotics. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990;3:171–196. [PubMed] 23. Levine M M, Lagos R, Levine O S, Heitmann I, Enriquez N, Pinto M E, Alvarez A M, Wu E, Mayorga C, Reyes A. Epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal infections in infants and young children in metropolitan Santiago, Chile, a newly industrializing country. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17:287–293. [PubMed] 24. Marchese A, Ramirez M, Schito G C, Tomasz A. Molecular epidemiology of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates recovered in Italy from 1993 to 1996. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2944–2949. [PubMed] 25. McDougal L K, Facklam R, Reeves M, Hunter S, Swenson J M, Hill B H, Tenover F C. Analysis of multiply antimicrobial-resistant isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:2176–2184. [PubMed] 26. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 8th informational supplement. NCCLS publication M100-S58. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1998. 27. Nesin M, Ramirez M, Tomasz A. Capsular transformation of a multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in vivo. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:707–713. [PubMed] 28. Rossi A, Ruvinsky R, Regueira M, Corso A, Pace J, Gentile A, di Fabio J L. the Streptococcus pneumoniae Working Group. Distribution of capsular types and penicillin resistance of strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae causing systemic infections in Argentinean children under 5 years of age. Microb Drug Resist. 1997;3:135–140. [PubMed] 29. Rossi A, Corso A, Pace J, Regueira M, Tomasz A. Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Argentina: frequent occurrence of an internationally spread serotype 14 clone. Microb Drug Resist. 1998;4:225–231. [PubMed] 30. Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. 31. Scott J A, Hall A J, Dagan R, Dixon J M, Eykyn S J, Fenoll A, Hortal M, Jette L P, Jorgensen J H, Lamothe F, Latorre C, Macfarlane J T, Shlaes D M, Smart L E, Taunay A. Serogroup-specific epidemiology of Streptococcus pneumoniae: associations with age, sex, and geography in 7,000 episodes of invasive disease. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22:973–981. [PubMed] 32. Sniadack D H, Schwartz B, Lipman H, Bogaerts J, Butler J C, Dagan R, Echaniz-Aviles G, Lloyd-Evans N, Fenoll A, Girgis N I, Henrichsen J, Klugman K, Lehmann D, Takala A K, Vandepitte J, Gove S, Breiman R F. Potential interventions for the prevention of childhood pneumonia: geographic and temporal differences in serotype and serogroup distribution of sterile site pneumococcal isolates from children—implications for vaccine strategies. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995;14:503–510. [PubMed] 33. Soares S, Kristinsson K G, Musser J M, Tomasz A. Evidence for the introduction of a multiresistant clone of serotype 6B Streptococcus pneumoniae from Spain to Iceland in the late 1980s. J Infect Dis. 1993;168:158–163. [PubMed] 34. Tenover F, Arbeit R D, Goering R V, Mickelsen P A, Murray B E, Persing D H, Swaminathan B. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2233–2239. [PubMed] 35. Tomasz A, de Lencastre H. Molecular microbiology and epidemiology: coexistence or alliance? In: Wenzel R P, editor. Prevention and control of nosocomial infections. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1997. pp. 309–321. 36. Tomasz A, Corso A, Severina E P, Echaniz-Aviles G, Brandileone M C, Camou T, Castaneda E, Figueroa O, Rossi A, di Fabio J L. and Members of the PAHO/Rockefeller University Workshop: Molecular epidemiologic characterization of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae invasive pediatric isolates recovered in six Latin-American countries: an overview. Microb Drug Resist. 1998;4:195–207. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||
Microb Drug Resist. 1997 Summer; 3(2):131-3.
[Microb Drug Resist. 1997]World Health Stat Q. 1992; 45(2-3):180-91.
[World Health Stat Q. 1992]Microb Drug Resist. 1997 Summer; 3(2):131-3.
[Microb Drug Resist. 1997]Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Jun; 26(6):1355-61.
[Clin Infect Dis. 1998]Microb Drug Resist. 1998 Fall; 4(3):195-207.
[Microb Drug Resist. 1998]Microb Drug Resist. 1997 Summer; 3(2):147-52.
[Microb Drug Resist. 1997]Microb Drug Resist. 1998 Fall; 4(3):233-9.
[Microb Drug Resist. 1998]Microb Drug Resist. 1997 Summer; 3(2):147-52.
[Microb Drug Resist. 1997]J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jan; 29(1):109-14.
[J Clin Microbiol. 1991]J Infect Dis. 1993 Jul; 168(1):158-63.
[J Infect Dis. 1993]J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep; 33(9):2233-9.
[J Clin Microbiol. 1995]Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Jan; 13(1):64-73.
[Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994]J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Oct; 36(10):2944-9.
[J Clin Microbiol. 1998]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Oct; 36(10):2176-84.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992]J Infect Dis. 1998 Mar; 177(3):707-13.
[J Infect Dis. 1998]Microb Drug Resist. 1997 Summer; 3(2):147-52.
[Microb Drug Resist. 1997]Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Nov; 41(11):2406-13.
[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997]J Infect Dis. 1988 Feb; 157(2):256-63.
[J Infect Dis. 1988]J Bacteriol. 1991 Mar; 173(5):1617-22.
[J Bacteriol. 1991]J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Feb; 5(2):154-66.
[J Clin Microbiol. 1977]Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Jan-Feb; 13(1):56-60.
[Rev Infect Dis. 1991]J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Dec; 36(12):3447-54.
[J Clin Microbiol. 1998]Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990 Apr; 3(2):171-96.
[Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990]J Infect. 1993 Sep; 27(2):157-68.
[J Infect. 1993]JAMA. 1992 Dec 16; 268(23):3328-32.
[JAMA. 1992]Indian J Med Res. 1996 Sep; 104():205-7.
[Indian J Med Res. 1996]Clin Infect Dis. 1996 Jun; 22(6):973-81.
[Clin Infect Dis. 1996]Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995 Jun; 14(6):503-10.
[Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995]J Infect. 1993 Sep; 27(2):157-68.
[J Infect. 1993]