• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plntphysLink to Publisher's site
Plant Physiol. Mar 2001; 125(3): 1517–1528.

A Terminal Flower1-Like Gene from Perennial Ryegrass Involved in Floral Transition and Axillary Meristem Identity1


Control of flowering and the regulation of plant architecture have been thoroughly investigated in a number of well-studied dicot plants such as Arabidopsis, Antirrhinum, and tobacco. However, in many important monocot seed crops, molecular information on plant reproduction is still limited. To investigate the regulation of meristem identity and the control of floral transition in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) we isolated a ryegrass TERMINAL FLOWER1-like gene, LpTFL1, and characterized it for its function in ryegrass flower development. Perennial ryegrass requires a cold treatment of at least 12 weeks to induce flowering. During this period a decrease in LpTFL1 message was detected in the ryegrass apex. However, upon subsequent induction with elevated temperatures and long-day photoperiods, LpTFL1 message levels increased and reached a maximum when the ryegrass apex has formed visible spikelets. Arabidopsis plants overexpressing LpTFL1 were significantly delayed in flowering and exhibited dramatic changes in architecture such as extensive lateral branching, increased growth of all vegetative organs, and a highly increased trichome production. Furthermore, overexpression of LpTFL1 was able to complement the phenotype of the severe tfl1-14 mutant of Arabidopsis. Analysis of the LpTFL1 promoter fused to the UidA gene in Arabidopsis revealed that the promoter is active in axillary meristems, but not the apical meristem. Therefore, we suggest that LpTFL1 is a repressor of flowering and a controller of axillary meristem identity in ryegrass.

The life cycle of flowering plants in general can be divided in to three growth phases: vegetative, inflorescence, and floral (Poethig 1990). In the vegetative phase the shoot apical meristem (SAM) generates leaves that later will ensure the resources necessary to produce fertile offspring. Upon receiving the appropriate environmental and developmental signals the plant switches to floral, or reproductive, growth and the SAM enters the inflorescence phase (I1) and gives rise to an inflorescence with flower primordia. During this phase the fate of the SAM and the secondary shoots that arise in the axils of the leaves is determined by a set of meristem identity genes, some of which prevent and some of which promote the development of floral meristems. Once established, the plant enters the late inflorescence phase (I2) where the floral organs are produced. Two basic types of inflorescences have been identified in plants: determinate and indeterminate (Weberling, 1989). In determinate species the SAM eventually produces floral organs and the production of meristems is terminated with a flower. The SAM of indeterminate species is not converted to a floral identity and will therefore only produce floral meristems from its periphery, resulting in a continuous growth pattern. The regulation of meristem identity and plant architecture has been investigated in a number of dicotyledonous plants including Arabidopsis, Antirrhinum, tomato, and tobacco. However, in important seed crops such as wheat, barley, rice, forage grasses, and other monocotyledonous plants, information on how meristem determinacy is controlled is still limited. Therefore, we have undertaken a molecular investigation of the regulation of meristem identity and the control of floral transition in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), a cool-season perennial forage grass native to Europe, temperate Asia, and North Africa.

In terms of plant development, the aerial parts of ryegrass are produced by the apex positioned on the base crown a few millimeters above the ground and surrounded by developing leaves (Fig. (Fig.1A).1A). During vegetative growth the apical meristem generates lateral meristems initially recognized as semicircular ridges along the main axis. These become the leaf primordia. This morphological pattern does not change until the apex has been induced to flower by elevated temperatures and increasing day length. The minimal requirement for flower induction in perennial ryegrass is a vernalization period of 12 to 14 weeks below 5°C followed by secondary induction with long-day photoperiods (LD, 16 h of light, 8 h of darkness) and temperatures above 20°C. Upon transition to reproductive growth, the apical meristem and later also the lateral meristems start to expand and eventually turn into groups of inflorescences (spikelets), each containing three to 10 floral meristems. The spikelets are attached alternately and directly to the central axis (rachis; Fig. Fig.1B).1B). Each floret consists of four whorls of organs. The outermost whorl (1) consists of the palea and the lemma surrounding the lodicules (whorl 2), the three stamens (whorl 3), and the gynoecium (whorl 4), which is interpreted as syncarpous, consisting of two or three carpels forming the ovary (Fig. (Fig.1C).1C). The latter arises at the apex as a single ring-like structure surrounding the emerging single ovule (Barnard, 1957).

Figure 1
Comparative morphology of perennial ryegrass and Arabidopsis. A, The ryegrass vegetative apex is very compact with the SAM and the semicircular ridges that later will give rise to leaves and tillers. It is positioned on the basal crown and surrounded ...

The flowers of the ryegrass inflorescence are arranged in a cymose, always terminating apical growth with the production of a terminal flower. In this way ryegrass represent a determinate plant architecture also seen and described at the molecular level in dicot plants such as tobacco (Amaya et al., 1999) and tomato (Pnueli et al., 1998). In contrast, plants such as Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum have an indeterminate (racemose) inflorescence. The TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) gene of Arabidopsis and its homolog CENTRORADIALIS (CEN) in Antirrhinum have been identified as a group of genes that specify an indeterminate identity of inflorescence meristems. Mutations in TFL1/CEN result in the conversion of the inflorescence into a terminal flower (Shannon and Meeks-Wagner, 1991; Alvarez et al., 1992; Bradley et al., 1996, 1997; Ohshima et al., 1997). In addition to its effect on meristem fate, TFL1 also extends the vegetative phase of Arabidopsis (Shanon and Meeks-Wagner, 1991), but CEN does not seem to have a flowering time role in Antirrhinum (Bradley et al., 1996). CEN and TFL1 proteins have sequence similarity with mammalian phosphatidylethanolamine-binding proteins (PEBPs). These mammalian proteins were originally named for their ability to bind phospholipids in vitro (Grandy et al., 1990), but have recently been demonstrated to be regulators of the central Raf1/MEK/ERK signaling pathway (Yeung et al., 1999). The FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) gene also belongs to the family of plant PEBP genes, but has been shown to play an opposite role of TFL1 in mediating flower inducing signals in Arabidopsis (Kardailsky et al., 1999; Kobayashi et al., 1999).

Another group of genes specify a determinate floral meristem identity antagonistically to the TFL1 gene. Well-characterized genes such as LEAFY (LFY), APETALA1 (AP1), and CAULIFLOWER (CAL) from Arabidopsis belong to this group (Irish and Sussex, 1990; Schultz and Haughn, 1991; Mandel et al., 1992; Weigel et al., 1992; 1993; Bowman et al., 1993; Gustafson-Brown et al., 1994). Mutations in LEAFY or AP1 result in replacement of floral meristems by shoot meristems, and in accordance with their role, overexpression of LFY or AP1 in Arabidopsis converts shoots into flowers (Mandel and Yanofsky, 1995; Weigel and Nilsson, 1995). Studies of expression patterns and combined analysis of mutants and overexpressing lines have clarified some of the interactions among meristem identity genes (Levy and Dean, 1998, Nilsson et al., 1998; Liljegren et al., 1999; Ratcliffe et al., 1999; Ferrándiz et al., 2000; Samach et al., 2000).

Antagonism between TFL1 and LFY, AP1 and CAL1 is reflected in their complementary expression patterns and phenotypic effects. In wild-type Arabidopsis plants TFL1 is expressed in the center of the subapical region, whereas LFY, AP1, and CAL expression are confined to the developing flowers (Mandel et al., 1992; Bradley et al., 1997; Ratcliffe et al., 1999). In the tfl1 mutant the premature conversion of the apex into a floral meristem has been shown to be correlated with ectopic expression of LFY and AP1/CAL in the apex (Weigel et al., 1992; Bowman et al., 1993; Gustafson-Brown et al., 1994; Bradley et al., 1997). In accordance with this data, delayed up-regulation of LFY and AP1 is observed in 35STFL1 plants, resulting in an extended vegetative phase (Ratcliffe et al., 1998). There is increasing evidence to suggest that the ratio of LFY/TFL1 activity in the SAM controls the developmental fate of the meristem (Ratcliffe et al., 1999; Ferrándiz et al., 2000). Thus, the lower the ratio, the longer the vegetative phase will continue and the longer the SAM retains an indeterminate phenotype producing shoot meristems in place of flowers.

To investigate the mechanism underlying flowering control and plant architecture in a widely distributed, agronomically important monocot crop plant we have isolated a homolog of the Arabidopsis TFL1 gene from perennial ryegrass, LpTFL1, and characterized it for its potential role in determining plant architecture and the vegetative-reproductive phase transition in grasses. Our results suggest that LpTFL1 is a repressor of flowering in ryegrass with a unique expression pattern not reported before. Overexpression of LpTFL1 in Arabidopsis results in a dramatic extension of the vegetative-inflorescence phase and a lateral branching that is consequently more extreme compared with overexpression of TFL1 in Arabidopsis.


Isolation of a TFL1-Like Gene from Ryegrass

TFL1 was amplified from ryegrass inflorescence mRNA by reverse transcriptase- (RT) PCR using primers designed on the basis of an alignment of Arabidopsis TFL1, Antirrhinum CEN, tomato SP, and a related rice expressed sequence tag (EST; Fig. Fig.2A).2A). This fragment was used to screen a ryegrass flower cDNA library at moderate stringency for TFL1-like genes (LpTFL1 genes). One full-length cDNA was identified. The coding region of this cDNA shows 87% and 85% DNA sequence identity to two rice genes, FDR2 and FDR1, and 67% and 64% identity with TFL1 and CEN, respectively. The region in the rice EST used to design the LpTFL1-specific primers is 86% identical to LpTFL1. On the protein level LpTFL1 shows 91% and 86% identity to the corresponding proteins, FDR2 and FDR1, respectively, and 71% and 68% identity to TFL1 and CEN (Fig. (Fig.2B).2B). The LpTFL1 cDNA-coding region shows 60% identity with the FT sequence, and the protein identity is 56%. Comparison of LpTFL1 sequence with other plant PEBP sequences found in the database revealed that LpTFL1 groups together with the two rice proteins and also CET1 from tobacco (Fig. (Fig.2C).2C). Banfield and Brady (2000) have recently determined the three-dimensional structure of the CEN protein and identified the amino acids essential for a functional ligand-binding site. Other amino acids important for a functional protein have been identified by mutation (Bradley et al., 1997; Ohshima et al., 1997; Pnueli et al., 1998) (Fig. (Fig.2B).2B). Of these 11 amino acids, LpTFL1 differs from CEN at only one position (110), having a Ser instead of a Met.

Figure 2
Genomic organization of LpTFL1 and similarity of the deduced protein with other plant PEBPs. A, The upper bar shows the genomic organization of the gene, including the untranslated (black boxes) and the translated (white boxes) regions. A 180-bp TFL1 ...

A DNA-blot analysis at moderate stringency using a full-length LpTFL1 cDNA fragment as probe was performed to assess the number of TFL1-like genes in ryegrass. The results indicate that two TFL1-like genes are present in ryegrass (data not shown). To gain more information on the LpTFL1 gene we screened a ryegrass genomic library with the full-length LpTFL1 cDNA clone. Three independent genomic clones were retrieved and sequenced. All had an identical DNA sequence predicting the same open reading frames, which exactly matched the LpTFL1 cDNA. The genomic organization of LpTFL1 (Fig. (Fig.2A)2A) is similar to that of the TFL1 and CEN with three introns in the same positions (Fig. (Fig.2B),2B), although the introns are of different sizes in ryegrass (100, 208, and 82 bp) compared with Arabidopsis (209, 205, and 86 bp). In the approximately 3.6-kb region upstream of the transcription start, no likely gene encoding open reading frames were found and therefore we assume this to be the LpTFL1 promoter. The existence of regulatory elements further upstream of the approximately 3.6-kb fragment cannot be excluded; however, in Arabidopsis only a approximately 2.7-kb non-coding DNA fragment is found upstream the transcription start of TFL1 .

The LpTFL1 Gene in Ryegrass Shows an Expression Pattern Different from TFL1 in Arabidopsis

To determine the expression pattern of LpTFL1 message in ryegrass we examined the mRNA levels in different tissues by a RNase protection assay. Ryegrass apices, however, are extremely small (<0.5 mm) until the secondary induction stage, where the inflorescence rapidly expands, so in addition we also performed RT-PCR on apex samples that were excised from plants at different stages during flowering induction. Each reaction was repeated three times independently.

LpTFL1 message was detectable in most types of tissue, except for seeds (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A). As early as seedling stage (1–2 visible leaves), LpTFL1 message was detectable by the RNase protection assay. Expression of LpTFL1 was also detected in leaves from secondary induced plants, and it reached approximately the same level as LpTFL1 message in the mature flowers. Leaf expression of TFL1 in Arabidopsis has not been reported (Bradley et al., 1997), however, detection of CEN message in Antirrhinum and CET1 message in tobacco in other tissues than the meristematic regions have been reported by RT-PCR (Bradley et al., 1996; Amaya et al., 1999). After 6 weeks of vernalization less LpTFL1 message was detected in the apex of vernalized plants compared with unvernalized plants (Fig. (Fig.3B).3B). In contrast, we could detect a strong up-regulation of LpTFL1 message in the apex after the ryegrass plant had been transferred to the warmer conditions and LD photoperiods, which induce reproductive development. However, the level of LpTFL1 message was lower in fully matured inflorescences (42 d sec. induction) compared with the stem and also the root (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A). A high level of LpTFL1 transcription was detected in roots from plants growing in LD for 4 weeks.

Figure 3
LpTFL1 mRNA levels in various tissues detected by ribonuclease protection assay (A) and RT-PCR (B). Fifteen micrograms of RNA was used from each kind of tissue that was hybridized with a 350-bp LpTFL1 and a 180-bp GAPDH antisense riboprobe before RNase ...

LpTFL1 Delays or Prevents Flowering in Arabidopsis

LpTFL1, one of the two TFL1-like genes in ryegrass, has a function similar to the Arabidopsis TFL1. We used the maize ubiquitin promoter (Christensen and Quail, 1996) to drive overexpression of the LpTFL1-coding region in Arabidopsis. Following transformation with UBI::LpTFL1, 33 BASTA-resistant Arabidopsis plants were obtained. All the transformants showed remarkable vegetative characteristics and were much delayed in flowering compared with the wild type (Figs. (Figs.44 and and5).5). Whereas wild-type plants bolted 10 d after they were moved from SD (short day) to LD photoperiod, even the earliest flowering UBI::LpTFL1 plants required another month in LD before they bolted. After 3 months, more than one-half of the plants had not produced a single flower (Fig. (Fig.4C).4C). Overexpression of LpTFL1 affected the vegetative and the early inflorescence stage of Arabidopsis, as observed by the increased number of nodes produced before and after bolting. During the vegetative phase, wild-type Arabidopsis plants produced 16 ± 1.9 rosette leaves, whereas the UBI::LpTFL1 plants grown under the same conditions produced 33.9 ± 8.9 rosette leaves (not shown). After the plants had bolted, the UBI::LpTFL1 plants produced 26 ± 14.3 cauline leaves on the main stem before flowering, in contrast to the wild type, which produced only 4.8 ± 0.4 cauline leaves (Fig. (Fig.4C).4C). Thus, in terms of time and the number of nodes produced before flowering, the majority of the UBI::LpTFL1 plants appeared to be arrested in the early inflorescence phase. Similar observations were made in Arabidopsis plants in which overexpression of TFL1 was driven by the 35S cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) promoter (Ratcliffe et al., 1998). However, the 35S::TFL1 plants produced only two-thirds of the number of rosette leaves and one-half of the number of cauline leaves compared with the UBI::LpTFL1 plants, when grown under continuous light (Ratcliffe et al., 1998). Five UBI::LpTFL1 plants (lines 2, 7, 9, 11, and 13) remained in the early inflorescence stage throughout their life cycle and failed to produce flowers before they senescenced and died (after 7 months). Non-flowering individuals has also been observed in 35S::TFL1 Arabidopsis; however, this was only when these plants were grown under SD condition (Ratcliffe et al., 1998) and not under LD conditions, as reported here.

Figure 4
UBI-LpTFL1 dramatically alters the duration of the vegetative phase of Arabidopsis. A, RNA gel-blot analysis of primary transformants (lines 1–30) and wild-type plants (WT). Fifteen micrograms of RNA from rosette leaves was blotted and probed ...
Figure 5
The effect of UBI-LpTFL1 on the morphology of Arabidopsis. A, The UBI::LpTFL1 Arabidopsis primary transformants, line 1 and 2 (right-hand side), showing extensive vegetative growth and up to fourth-order branching 4 months after germination compared with ...

In addition to the main SAM, Arabidopsis plants transformed with UBI::LpTFL1 also exhibit abnormal axillary meristem development. The development of coflorescences with developing flowers in the axils of the cauline leaves normally observed in wild-type Arabidopsis was rarely seen in the UBI::LpTFL1 plants. However, in the place of floral organ formation, a “leafy” branch was produced, resulting in a highly branched, bushy, and dramatic phenotype (Fig. (Fig.5A).5A). Third-order branching was a common trait among the UBI::LpTFL1 plants, and fourth-order branching was observed in a single plant (Fig. (Fig.5A,5A, right-hand plant). A reiterative series of leaves was continuously produced from the SAM of the UBI::LpTFL1 plants, most of them with a high density of trichomes (Fig. (Fig.5B).5B). The trichome distribution on the surface of the cauline leaves was in general much more dense than in the wild type (Fig. (Fig.5,5, C and D). Increased trichome production in relation to TFL1 overexpression in Arabidopsis has not previously been reported, although the disappearance of adaxial trichomes is a marker for loss of juvenility (Chien and Sussex, 1996; Telfer et al., 1997). Compared with the wild type, most of the UBI::LpTFL1 plants produced remarkably more and longer internodes on the main stem, and also on the coflorescences. In contrast to the wild-type plants, the uppermost coflorescences without the subtending cauline leaf of the UBI::LpTFL1 plants did not consist of normal solitary flowers, but instead a leaf-like shoot (Fig. (Fig.55E).

Based on the time to flowering, the transformants could be grouped into four classes (A–D) displaying a phenotype from late flowering (Fig. (Fig.4C,4C, group A) to never flowering (Fig. (Fig.4C,4C, group D). RNA gel-blot analysis revealed that most of the UBI::LpTFL1 plants showed strong expression of LpTFL1 (Fig. (Fig.4A,4A, lines 1–31). Overall, the severity of the UBI::LpTFL1 plant phenotypes was positively correlated with the level of LpTFL1 expression in the corresponding plants, although the two lines (1 and 23) with the highest LpTFL1 expression level did flower after 174 and 182 d, respectively. The expression level of LpTFL1, in turn, was positively correlated with the total number of gene copies inserted in the genome, as determined by DNA gel-blot analysis (data not shown). In plants with a single-copy insertion (Fig. (Fig.4A,4A, lines 5, 16, and 29–30), the LpTFL1 RNA levels were reduced compared with other lines and consequently the phenotype was less severe, but the time to flowering was still significantly longer than in the wild type (Fig. (Fig.4C,4C, group A). Three BASTA-resistant plants in which LpTFL1 expression was not detected by gel-blot analysis looked similar to wild-type plants with respect to their morphology, but flowered 10 d later than the wild type (not shown).

Detection of the floral meristem identity genes AP1 was performed by RT-PCR on mRNA isolated from Arabidopsis wild type, the tfl1-14 mutant, and the hemizygote second generation UBI::LpTFL1 line 17. The plants were harvested when the mutant flowered and the first floral organs were visible in the wild type. AP1 transcript was detectable in the tfl1-14 mutant and the wild type, but was not detectable in the UB:LpTFL1 line 17 (Fig. (Fig.4C),4C), suggesting that LpTFL1, like TFL1, is capable of suppressing or delaying the transcription of AP1 in Arabidopsis.

LpTFL1 Overexpression in a tfl1-14 Mutant Background

To further address the functional similarity between LpTFL1 and Arabidopsis TFL1 we asked if LpTFL1 is able to complement the Arabidopsis tfl1-14 strong mutant allele. In this mutant a C to T mutation leads to a Thr → iso-Leu substitution at position 69 (Fig. (Fig.2B).2B). The tfl1-14 mutant has a short vegetative phase and exhibits reduced plant height with few nodes, increased number of inflorescence arising from the rosette axillary meristems, and a determinate growth pattern (Bradley et al., 1997; Ohshima et al., 1997). The construct used for transformation of the Arabidopsis wild type was also used for transformation of the tfl1-14 mutant. More than 100 independent UBI::LpTFL1-tfl1-14 primary transformants were obtained from each mutant line after selection for the binary plasmid. All the plants displayed a variety of phenotypes from wild type to the same extended vegetative phenotype seen in the UBI::LpTFL1 wild-type background. On average (taken only from the first six plants flowering) the UBI::LpTFL1-tfl1-14 plants produced 15.2 ± 3.5 cauline leaves on the main stem and flowered 33 d later than the tfl1-14 mutant and 23 d later than the wild type (Fig. (Fig.4C).4C). All the UBI::LpTFL1-tfl1-14 plants grew indefinitely and the production of terminal flowers and rosette inflorescence, which is always seen in the tfl1-14 mutants, was never observed in the transformants. Thus, the LpTFL1 rescued the Arabidopsis tfl1-14 mutant in terms of morphology, and the extended vegetative appearance we observe is presumably due to the force of the relatively strong maize ubiquitin promoter.

LpTFL1 Is a Potential Regulator of Axillary Meristem Development

We examined the properties of the approximately 3.6-kb putative LpTFL1 promoter by fusing it to the UidA gene and transforming it into Arabidopsis. More than 100 BASTA-resistant lines were obtained. Ten seedlings of primary transformants with six to seven rosette leaves were tested for GUS expression. Three out of the 10 transformants showed β-glucuronidase (GUS) expression, and in all three plants the expression was confined to a very narrow area in the axillary meristems of the rosette leaves (Fig. (Fig.6A).6A). Another test for GUS activity was performed after the plants had bolted and had produced four to five cauline leaves with flowers in the axils. Fifteen primary transformants were tested and GUS activity was detected in three of these plants. At this stage GUS activity was still detected in the axillary meristems of the rosette leaves, but it was also detected in some of the axillary meristems of the cauline leaves, although weaker (Fig. (Fig.6B).6B). In this area, however, GUS activity remained even after the formation of a new flower (Fig. (Fig.6B).6B). No GUS expression was detected in the apical meristem or in Arabidopsis leaves, although LpTFL1 is expressed in ryegrass leaves. Analysis of GUS-positive T2 lines showed similar results (not shown). Furthermore, it showed that GUS expression was restricted to the axillary meristems of rosette leaves and the three to five most basal cauline leaves, which were initiated during the vegetative phase. Thus, we find that the activity of the approximately 3.6-kb LpTFL1 promoter used in this experiment is regulated differently from the expression of LpTFL1 in ryegrass, and that the GUS expression pattern is similar to TFL1 expression only in the secondary shoot meristems formed during the vegetative phase.

Figure 6
LpTFL1 promoter activity in Arabidopsis revealed by GUS expression. A, Thirteen-day-old seedling; B, lower stem section bearing a coflorescence subtended by a cauline leaf 7 d after bolting,


Perennial ryegrass is a forage grass with a high agronomic value, since it is a low-cost crop, it is perennial, and it is widely used for feeding cattle. One of the major goals in crop improvement is the control of reproductive growth and flower development. Molecular information on these events is very limited in this species. We have isolated a TFL1-like gene from perennial ryegrass, which is likely to be a repressor of flowering and involved in control of axillary meristem identity.

Lolium LpTFL1 Is a New Member of the Plant PEBP Family

The ryegrass TFL1-like gene, LpTFL1, encodes a protein with high homology to a group of plant proteins that share structural similarities to mammalian PEBPs. Based on these similarities the plant PEBPs are predicted to play a role in the regulation of signaling cascades as has been shown for the mammalian PEBPs (Young et al., 1999; Banfield and Brady, 2000). The two proteins most similar to LpTFL1 are the rice FDR2 and FDR1 with 91% and 86% identity, respectively. In a multiple comparison including TFL1-like proteins from different species, as well as FT from Arabidopsis, LpTFL1 is grouped together with the two rice proteins and a tobacco CEN-like protein, CET1. No data on FDR2/FDR1 expression patterns and functions in rice has been reported, and for CET1, expression has been reported to be detectable in vegetative and inflorescence shoots, but only by RT-PCR (Amaya et al., 1999). Compared with the Arabidopsis PEBP sequences, LpTFL1 shows 71% identity to TFL1 and 56% identity to FT. FT, which is 56% identical to the TFL1 protein, also belongs to the family of plant PEBPs, however, in contrast to TFL1, FT has been shown to mediate flowering-inducing signals in Arabidopsis (Kardailsky et al., 1999; Kobayashi et al., 1999). In this process FT acts in parallel with and under the influence of the CONSTANS (CO) gene, which is a mediator of the LD-induction pathway (Samach et al., 2000). LpTFL1 shows 50% identity to a partial FT-like region on a rice clone (nbxb0035E07r), but although the DNA-blot analysis indicates the existence of another LpTFL1-like gene, no ryegrass FT-like cDNA with a higher homology to this partial rice FT-like sequence has yet been identified. Overexpression of LpTFL1 in Arabidopsis results in significantly delayed flowering in combination with a dramatic large and bushy phenotype, suggesting that LpTFL1 is more TFL1-like than FT-like.

In spite of the high degree of homology between the plant PEBPs, constitutive expression of these proteins in different plants leads to different phenotypes. The dramatic impact of LpTFL1 overexpression on floral transition and plant architecture in Arabidopsis is more extreme than that previously reported by overexpressing TFL1 in Arabidopsis (Ratcliffe et al., 1998). One possible explanation for the more severe phenotype observed in our study may be that the activity of the maize ubiquitin promoter is stronger than the 35S CaMV promoter in Arabidopsis. If this is the case, the monocot ubiquitin promoter shows a remarkably strong activity not previously reported in a dicot plant. Alternatively, our observation may be due to differences in the protein sequence and conformation of LpTFL1 compared with TFL1. Overexpression of CEN in tobacco has also been reported to significantly delay the floral transition, as well as to change the plant architecture (Amaya et al., 1999). In contrast, there was no effect of overexpressing TFL1 in tobacco (Amaya et al., 1999). These results, together with our results, indicate that differences in the protein sequences among the plant PEBPs are likely to account for some of the differences observed in the overexpressing plants.

Eleven amino acid residues in the plant PEBP sequences have so far been identified as essential for a functional protein (Fig. (Fig.2B)2B) by crystallography (Banfield and Brady, 2000) or by mutations (Bradley et al., 1997; Ohshima et al., 1997; Pnueli et al., 1998). At these residues, LpTFL1 differs from the consensus at one position (110), which is also the position with the highest degree of amino acid variation between species. It is interesting that the variation in amino acid residues at position 110 exactly matches the grouping of plant PEBP by the clustalW alignment (except for FT). One group comprising TFL1, BNTFL1–1, and BNTFL1–3 has a Leu at this position, and another group comprising CEN, CET2, CET4, and SP has a Met, and a third group, which includes LpTFL1, FDR2, FDR1, and CET1, has a Ser at this position. The immediate assumption that the amino acid differences at this position can be linked to the variance in phenotype severeness of plants overexpressing different TFL1-like genes would suggest that overexpression of BNTFL1–1/BNTFL1–3, like TFL1, also has no effect in species like tobacco, and that overexpression of CET1, FDR2/FDR1, like LpTFL1, might have a significant effect on plant architecture and flowering time in species like Arabidopsis. Future results on overexpression of TFL1-like genes in different species would contribute to clarify the correlation between protein sequence and the effect on morphology. In any case, our results show that the effects of different PEBPs cannot solely be explained by genetical diversity, since ryegrass is more distantly related to any of the dicot species, and yet LpTFL1 has a strong and unequivocal effect on the Arabidopsis.

Control of Floral Transition

The dramatic phenotype of Arabidopsis plants overexpressing LpTFL1 suggests that in ryegrass, LpTFL1 may play a role in controlling meristem identity and in the transition from vegetative to reproductive growth. In ryegrass, LpTFL1 message is detected at all stages from germination to maturity. It is found at the apex, in the inflorescence, and also in leaves, stems, roots, and mature flowers. However, expression of LpTFL1 in the ryegrass apex is not constitutive. Levels of LpTFL1 message changed during flower induction with a reduction after 6 weeks of vernalization, followed by a strong up-regulation during secondary induction until the structures of the spikelets were visible. Data on cold-induced down-regulation of TFL1-like genes has not been reported, presumably because vernalization is normally not required for flowering induction in many of the tested species. Analysis of the expression pattern of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) in Arabidopsis, a gene encoding a MADS-box repressor of flowering that is down-regulated by vernalization (Sheldon et al., 1999), suggests that the physiological role of vernalization is to alleviate a block in flowering. Since LpTFL1 may function as a repressor of flowering in perennial ryegrass, a species that requires at least 12 weeks of cold treatment to flower, down-regulation of LpTFL1 during vernalization may be necessary for ryegrass to proceed to the reproductive phase. It is intriguing that the late-flowering phenotype of 35S::TFL1 Arabidopsis can be suppressed by a vernalization treatment, suggesting that TFL1 may repress the up-regulation of floral meristem identity genes by increasing FLC activity or expression (Ratcliffe et al., 1998; Simpson et al., 1999). In unvernalized perennial ryegrass an analogous system may be operating in which the level of a FLC-like protein might be high due in part to induction by LpTFL1. Down-regulation of LpTFL1 upon vernalization, and perhaps an FLC-like protein as well, would then be necessary for the meristem to be competent to flower. This would represent an important additional role for LpTFL1 in flowering and finer dissection of LpTFL1 message level during vernalization will be required to substantiate this role.

Some of the Arabidopsis plants overexpressing LpTFL1 never flowered before senescence. Similar vegetative non-flowering Arabidopsis plants were obtained by combining mutations in AP1, CAULIFLOWER (CAL), and FRUITFULL (FUL), all three MADS-box genes (Ferrándiz et al., 2000). The vegetative growth of the triple mutant was correlated with a low LFY:TFL1 transcript ratio and with TFL1 becoming ectopically expressed in the laterally arising meristems in an overlapping pattern with LFY expression. The SAM of the ap1, cal, ful triple mutant is arrested in the vegetative→I1 phase, producing only cauline leaves with axillary meristems that in turn repeat this pattern forming “leafy” cauliflower along the main inflorescence (Ferrándiz et al., 2000). Similar cauliflower-like structures were not observed in our UBI::LpTFL1 plants because the repeated formation of meristems was slower. However, an additional morphological characteristic of the UBI::LpTFL1 plants was the high density of trichomes that covered the leaves and the SAM (Fig. (Fig.5).5). In Arabidopsis, disappearance of the trichomes from the adaxial surface of cauline leaves has been shown to be tightly linked to floral induction and in support for this observation, it was shown that tfl1 leads to accelerated loss of adaxial trichomes in Arabidopsis (Telfer et al., 1997). In agreement with this observation we find that the expression of a TFL1-like gene in Arabidopsis prevents the loss of adaxial trichomes. By this criterion the UBI::LpTFL1 plants were less competent to flower compared with the triple mutant. However, the fact that most of the UBI::LpTFL1 plants do flower and produce normal flowers after an extended vegetative phase suggests that a delayed, but otherwise normal expression of LFY, AP1, CAL, and the floral organ identity genes has occurred. Therefore, the level of LpTFL1 activity can be decreased over time or additional factors override LpTFL1 function and ensure the proper transcription of meristem and organ identity genes. One possible factor is FT, which is able to up-regulate floral meristem identity gene like AP1 and LFY (Kobayashi et al., 1999; Samach et al., 2000).

A Potential Molecular Mechanism for Determinate Plant Architecture in Perennial Ryegrass

Perennial ryegrass and Arabidopsis represent two different forms of plant architecture: determinate and indeterminate, respectively. A molecular basis for indeterminate growth has been proposed for Arabidopsis (Bradley et al., 1996, 1997; Ratcliffe et al., 1998, 1999; Liljegren et al., 1999) in which indeterminate plant architecture is correlated with expression of TFL1 in the center of the SAM. In this central region as well as in the uppermost layers of the SAM, TFL1 activity is capable of excluding the expression of AP1 and LFY, and therefore the formation of a terminal flower. Several parallels can be drawn between the Arabidopsis data and our results. Like TFL1 in Arabidopsis, LpTFL1 message is present in the ryegrass apex at the vegetative stage. Furthermore, a significant up-regulation of LpTFL1 occurs in the apex upon LD induction, which is similar to the up-regulation of TFL1 observed in Arabidopsis when the plants enter the I1 phase (Ratcliffe et al., 1999). Like TFL1, overexpression of LpTFL1 results in a repression of AP1 transcription (Fig. (Fig.4C).4C). Localization of LpTFL1 expression in the ryegrass apex awaits characterization, but our initial data based on the analysis of the LpTFL1 promoter driving GUS expression in Arabidopsis showed strong activity in the axillary meristems of the rosette leaves during the vegetative phase (Fig. (Fig.6A).6A). At later stages, when plants had bolted, GUS activity was still detectable in the axillary meristems of the rosette leaves, as well as in the axillary meristems of those cauline leaves that were initiated during the vegetative phase (Fig. (Fig.6B).6B). Although weaker, the GUS activity remained in this position after the shoots developed. No visible GUS activity was detected in the SAM where TFL1 is normally expressed. The axillary expression of LpTFL1::GUS is reminiscent of CET2/CET4 expression in tobacco, a species with determinate plant architecture, in which CET2/CET4 is restricted to the axillary meristems and excluded from the SAM (Amaya et al., 1999). The restricted expression pattern of CET2/CET4 was found to be correlated with expression of the tobacco LFY homolog NFL in the center of the inflorescence apical meristem (Amaya et al., 1999). A similar LFY-like mediated exclusion of LpTFL1 from the center of the ryegrass SAM still needs to be confirmed. Our observed LpTFL1::GUS expression suggests that some regulatory elements are missing in the approximately 3.6-kb LpTFL1 promoter fragment or that the elements in the monocot promoter is not fully recognized in Arabidopsis. Ohshima et al. (1997) found that insertion of a T-DNA 458 bp downstream of the putative TFL1 polyadenylation signal leads to the production of an Arabidopsis tfl1 mutant phenotype, suggesting the existence of a regulatory element 3′ of the TFL1 gene. In an alternate manner, the lack of GUS expression in the SAM may be due to a different set of transcription regulatory factors associated with the determinate architecture of ryegrass. In summary, ryegrass architecture may be the result of lack of LpTFL1 expression in the SAM resulting in determinacy combined with LpTFL1 expression in the meristematic ridges of the ryegrass apex (the axillary meristems) resulting in repression of floral identity genes and specification of an indeterminate shoot meristem identity allowing the formation of tillers.

Analysis of transgenic ryegrass overexpressing LpTFL1 is in progress, and based on the data presented here we can speculate the following scenario for LpTFL-mediated control of floral transition and plant architecture: Shortly after germination, LpTFL1 expression is established in the meristematic ridges of the apex to maintain the production of vegetative organs such as leaves and tillers. During vegetative growth, a high level of LpTFL1 and other flowering repressors, perhaps similar to FLC, is maintained to avoid precocious flowering before the winter season. During the winter vernalization period, levels of LpTFL1 and other flowering repressors decreases, allowing the plants to become competent for flowering. As the temperature increases and the photoperiods lengthen in spring, LpTFL1 expression is up-regulated in the apex to promote lateral branching of the main axis. In this way, a maximum number of spikelets are produced. Expression of LpTFL1 subsequently becomes progressively more restricted to vegetative tissues such as stem and root, and the ryegrass plant finishes its life cycle by the production of the last uppermost seed in the top spike.

Dissection of the molecular mechanisms underlying the floral transition and flower formation in important monocot crop plants like perennial ryegrass is in its infancy. By analyzing one of the main components in this multifactorial process, a TFL1-like gene in perennial ryegrass, we have just begun to address the question of how the green common ryegrass growing on millions of acres is transformed into flowering plants each year following a winter season. Further studies will perhaps confirm and certainly modify the scenario for LpTFL1 function that we propose here.


Plant Growth Conditions

Ryegrass (Lolium perenne) plants (clone F6, DLF-TRIFOLIUM) were grown in soil in a greenhouse with daylight at 21 and 18°C, day and night temperature, respectively. For the primary induction (vernalization) plants were grown in a growth chamber at or below 5°C for at least 12 weeks. During vernalization, the light period was decreased to 8 h per day. Following vernalization, plants were grown under 16 h of light at 22°C and 18°C, day and night temperature, respectively, for secondary induction. For RNA analysis plants were harvested before vernalization, after 6 weeks of vernalization, and after 14 and 28 d of secondary induction and meristems were excised. Samples from other tissues like leaves, stems, seeds, and roots were also harvested for expression analysis.

Arabidopsis seeds were stratified for 2 to 3 d at 4°C and then grown in soil in growth chambers at 22°C and 18°C , day and night temperature, respectively. During the first 2 weeks plants were grown at SD conditions (8 h of light per day) and then moved to LD conditions (16 h of light per day). In the Arabidopsis time-course experiment rosette leaves were counted when plants started to bolt and the number of leaf nodes were counted from the most basal cauline leaf to the uppermost leaf proximal to the inflorescence. The number of days from germination to the production of the first flower-like structure was also scored.

Screening of cDNA and Genomic Library

To isolate TFL1-like genes from ryegrass, a set of primers partially conserved between TFL1 of Arabidopsis, CENof Antirrhinum, and a rice EST (RICR2918A; accession no. 428842) were designed. Primer RY2 N (5′-GGTTATGACAGACCCAGATGTG-3′) was used in combination with primer RY4V (5′-CGAACCTGTGGATACCAATG-3′) to amplify a 180-bp fragment by RT-PCR. Preparation of RNA for the RT-PCR used the FastRNA, GREEN Kit RNA isolation system (Bio101, Carlsbad, CA). The 180-bp fragment corresponding to a putative ryegrass TFL1-like fragment was used to screen a cDNA library (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) made of ryegrass inflorescences for full-length TFL1-like cDNAs. Approximately 800,000 recombinants were screened at moderate stringency of 60°C , with washes at 60°C in 2× SSC (0.3 m NaCl and 0.1 m sodium citrate, pH 7.4) and 0.1% (w/v) SDS. Three positive clones were isolated, and plasmids were isolated from single plaques by in vivo excision. All cDNA clones were sequenced and contained identical sequences with similarity to TFL1 and CEN and were named ryegrass TFL1-like, LpTFL1 (GenBank accession no. AF316419).

A λEMBL3 SP6/T7 genomic library (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) made from a partial Sau3A digest of ryegrass DNA was screened for TFL1-like genes. Approximately 1,000,000 recombinants were screened at moderate stringency (as described above) with the full-length LpTFL1 cDNA clone. Nine positive clones were isolated and digestion of the λ DNA clones with BamHI, SalI, XbaI, and SacI revealed three unique clones. These clones were partially sequenced and all three had identical sequence from 4.0 kb upstream and 2.0 kb downstream of the LpTFL1 sequence. The sequence of the exons of the genomic clones, as well as the 5′ and 3′ untranslated region were identical to LpTFL1. DNA sequencing was performed using the ABI Prism system (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, CA), and sequence analysis and alignments were produced using Gene Codes Sequencer software, version 4.02.

RNA/DNA Analysis

For detection of LpTFL1 RNA level in different organs of ryegrass, 15 μg of RNA was hybridized to a 350-bp riboprobe corresponding to the 5′ end of LpTFL1 antisense. The riboprobe was synthesized by in vitro transcription from a T7 priming site fused to the 350-bp LpTFL1 fragment by a T7 RNA polymerase in the presence of [α-32P]CTP (800 Ci/mMol). Hybridization, RNase digestion, and precipitation was performed as described in the system kit (RPA III, Ambion, Austin, TX) End products were electrophoresed on a 6% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel. The level of transcript was determined by autoradiography. A riboprobe corresponding to 180 bp of a ryegrass GAPDH antisense fragment was used as control.

Changes in LpTFL1 RNA levels in meristems during the flowering induction were detected by RT-PCR. Poly-(A)+ mRNA was isolated from 5 μg of total RNA and all mRNA was used in the reverse transcription. Two internal primers, INS5 (5′-CACATTGGTTATGACGGACC-3′) and INS3 (CTCCCCCCCAAATGAAGC-3′), were used in the subsequent PCR reaction to amplify a 200-bp LpTFL1 fragment from the first strand cDNA templates. PCR products were electrophoresed, blotted, and hybridized to a LpTFL1-specific probe using standard blotting techniques. For a positive control, primers for ryegrass ACTIN: AC5 (5′-GAGAAGATGACCCARATC-3′) and AC3 (5′-CACTTCATGATGGAGTTGT-3′) were used. The PCR reaction was repeated three times. Detection of LpTFL1 RNA levels in transformed Arabidopsis was performed by standard RNA gel-blot analysis. Detection of AP1 RNA levels in the 4-week-old tfl1-14 mutant, wild type, and the UBI::LpTFL1 line 17 was performed by RT-PCR using two 3′-end specific AP1 primers AP05 (5′-CCCCCTCTGCCA- CCG-3′) and AP03 (5′-AGGTTGCAGTTGTAAACGGG-3′).

Construction of UBI::LpTFL1 and the Transformation of Arabidopsis Wild Type and tfl1 Mutants

The coding region of LpTFL1 cDNA was amplified using primers B0 (5′-GGATCCCCATGTCTAGGTCTGTGGAG-3′) and B550 (5′-GGGATCCCACAACTGGGATAGCCA-3′) and recombinant pfu polymerase. The fragment was blunt ligated into vector pAHC27 (Christensen and Quail, 1996) containing the maize Ubiquitin promoter, an exon:intron region, and the NOS terminator. The entire cassette (UBI::EXintron::LpTFL1::NOS) was excised from the plasmid by digestion with HindII and EcoRI and was ligated into the EcoRI-HindII site of the binary vector pCAMBIA3300 (Jefferson, Australia), which confers BASTA resistance, to give pCAMLPTFL1. Arabidopsis plants (Columbia and tfl1-14 mutants) were transformed with Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 (Koncz and Schell, 1986) harboring the pCAMLPTFL1 (for LpTFL1 overexpression) using the floral dip method described by Clough and Bent (1998).

Construction of LpTFL1::GUS Arabidopsis Plants

A 3.6-kb SacI-RcaI DNA fragment upstream the start codon of LpTFL1 was ligated into the SacI-NcoI site of the binary vector pCAMBIA3301 (Jefferson), replacing the CaMV 35S promoter in front of the GUS first intron to give pCAMLpTFL1GUS. This vector also confers resistance to BASTA. Arabidopsis plants (Columbia) were transformed with pCAMLPTFL1GUS and with the original pCAMBIA3301 using the method described above. The colorimetric 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-glucuronic acid assay was used to determine the localization of GUS expression in Arabidopsis tissue (Jefferson, 1987). Leaves, stem, inflorescence, and axillary meristems were vacuum infiltrated and samples were incubated in the solution overnight at 37°C in the dark. Tissues were bleached in 96% (w/v) ethanol and GUS expression was recorded with a stereo microscope (Nikon, Tokyo).


We thank Dr. Thomas Didion and Dr. Yaron Levy for critical reading and editing of the paper. Also, a number of scientists at the Risoe National Laboratory were very supportive of C.S.J. during the course of his Ph.D. study.


1This work was supported in part by the Danish Research Academy.


  • Alvarez J, Guli CL, Yu X, Smyth DR. Terminal flower: a gene affecting inflorescence development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1992;2:103–116.
  • Amaya I, Ratcliffe OJ, Bradley DJ. Expression of CENTRORADIALIS (CEN) and CEN-like genes in tobacco reveals a conserved mechanism controlling phase change in diverse species. Plant Cell. 1999;11:1405–1417. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Banfield MJ, Brady RL. The structure of Antirrhinum Centroradialis protein (CEN) suggests a role as a kinase regulator. J Mol Biol. 2000;297:1159–1170. [PubMed]
  • Barnard C. Floral histogenesis in the monocotyledons: I. The Granineae. Aust J Bot. 1957;5:115–128.
  • Bradley D, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Vincent C, Rothstein S, Coen E. Control of inflorescence architecture in Antirrhinum. Nature. 1996;376:791–797. [PubMed]
  • Bradley D, Ratcliffe O, Vincent C, Carpenter R, Coen E. Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science. 1997;275:80–83. [PubMed]
  • Bowman JL, Alvarez J, Weigel D, Meyrowitz EM, Smyth D. Control of flower development in Arabidopsis thaliana by APETALA1 and interacting genes. Development. 1993;119:721–743.
  • Chien JC, Sussex IM. Differential regulation of trichome formation on the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces by gibberellins and photoperiod in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1996;111:1321–1328. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Christensen AH, Quail PH. Ubiquitin promoter-based vectors for high-level expression of selectable and/or screenable marker genes in monocotyledonous plants. Trans Res. 1996;5:213–218. [PubMed]
  • Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16:735–743. [PubMed]
  • Ferrándiz C, Gu Q, Martienssen R, Yanofsky MF. Redundant regulation of meristem identity and plant architecture by FRUITFULL, APETALA1, and CAULIFLOWER. Development. 2000;127:725–734. [PubMed]
  • Grandy DK, Hanneman E, Bunzow J, Shih M, Machida CA, Bidlack JM, Civelli O. Purification, cloning, and tissue distribution of a 23-kDa rat protein isolated by morphine affinity chromatography. Mol Endocrinol. 1990;4:1370–1376. [PubMed]
  • Gustafson-Brown C, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF. Regulation of the floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Cell. 1994;76:131–143. [PubMed]
  • Irish VF, Sussex IM. Function of the apetala-1 gene during Arabidopsis floral development. Plant Cell. 1990;2:741–753. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jefferson RA. Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1987;5:387–405.
  • Kardailsky I, Shukla VK, Ahn JH, Dagenais N, Christensen SK, Nguyen JT, Chory J, Harrison MJ, Weigel D. Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science. 1999;286:1962–1965. [PubMed]
  • Kobayashi Y, Kaya H, Goto K, Iwabuchi M, Araki T. A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. Science. 1999;286:1960–1962. [PubMed]
  • Koncz C, Schell J. The promoter of the TL-DNA gene 5 controls the tissue-specific expression of chimeric genes carried by a novel type of Agrobacterium binary vector. Mol Gen Genet. 1986;204:383–396.
  • Levy Y, Dean C. The transition to flowering. Plant Cell. 1998;10:1973–1989. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Liljegren SJ, Gustafson-Brown C, Pinyopich A, Ditta GS, Yanofsky MF. Interactions among APETALA1, LEAFY, and TERMINAL FLOWER1 specify meristem fate. Plant Cell. 1999;11:1007–1018. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mandel MA, Gustafson-Brown C, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature. 1992;360:273–277. [PubMed]
  • Mandel MA, Yanofsky MF. A gene triggering flower formation in Arabidopsis. Nature. 1995;377:522–524. [PubMed]
  • Mimida N, Sakamoto W, Murata M, Motoyoshi F. TERMINAL FLOWER 1-like genes in Brassica species. Plant Sci. 1999;142:155–162.
  • Nilsson O, Lee I, Blázquez MA, Weigel D. Flowering time genes modulate the response to LEAFY activity. Genetics. 1998;150:403–410. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ohshima S, Murata M, Sakamoto W, Ogura Y, Motoyoshi F. Cloning and molecular analysis of the Arabidopsis gene Terminal Flower1. Mol Gen Genet. 1997;254:186–194. [PubMed]
  • Pnueli L, Carmel-Goren L, Hareven D, Gutfinger T, Alvarez J, Ganal M, Zamir D, Lifschitz E. The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development. 1998;125:1979–1989. [PubMed]
  • Poethig RS. Phase change and the regulation of shoot morphogenesis in plants. Science. 1990;250:923–930. [PubMed]
  • Ratcliffe OJ, Amaya I, Vincent CA, Rothstein S, Carpenter R, Coen ES, Bradley DJ. A common mechanism controls the life cycle and architecture of plants. Development. 1998;125:1609–1615. [PubMed]
  • Ratcliffe OJ, Bradley DJ, Coen ES. Separation of shoot and floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Development. 1999;126:1109–1120. [PubMed]
  • Samach A, Onouchi H, Gold SE, Ditta GS, Schwartz-Sommer Z, Yanofsky MF, Coupland G. Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. Science. 2000;288:1613–1616. [PubMed]
  • Schultz EA, Haughn GW. LEAFY, a homeotic gene that regulates inflorescence development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1991;3:771–781. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Schultz EA, Haughn GW. Genetic analysis of the floral initiation process (FLIP) in Arabidopsis. Development. 1993;119:745–765.
  • Shanon S, Meek-Wagner DR. A mutation in the Arabidopsis TFL1 gene affects inflorescence meristem development. Plant Cell. 1991;3:877–892. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sheldon CS, Burn JE, Perez PP, Metzger J, Edwards JA, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES. The FLF MADS box gene: a repressor of flowering in Arabidopsis regulated by vernalization and methylation. Plant Cell. 1999;11:445–458. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Simpson GG, Gendall AR, Dean C. When to switch to flowering. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1999;99:519–550. [PubMed]
  • Telfer A, Bollman KM, Poethig RS. Phase change and the regulation of trichome distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development. 1997;124:645–654. [PubMed]
  • Weberling F. Morphology of Flowers and Inflorescences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
  • Weigel D, Alvarez J, Smith DR, Yanofsky MF, Meyerowitz EM. LEAFY controls floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Cell. 1992;69:843–859. [PubMed]
  • Weigel D, Nilsson O. A developmental switch sufficient for flower initiation in diverse plants. Nature. 1995;377:495–500. [PubMed]
  • Yeung K, Seitz T, Li SF, Janosh P, McFerran B, Mischak H, Sedivy JM, Kolch W. Suppression of Raf-1 kinase activity and MAP kinase signaling by RKIP. Nature. 1999;401:173–177. [PubMed]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Plant Biologists
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...