• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of narLink to Publisher's site
Nucleic Acids Res. May 15, 2001; 29(10): 2003–2011.

Transcription of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe U2 gene in vivo and in vitro is directed by two essential promoter elements


As compared to the metazoan small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), relatively little is known about snRNA synthesis in unicellular organisms. We have analyzed the transcription of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe U2 snRNA gene in vivo and in the homologous in vitro system. Deletion and linker-scanning analyses show that the S.pombe U2 promoter contains at least two elements: the spUSE centered at –55, which functions as an activator, and a TATA box at –26, which is essential for basal transcription. These data point to a similar architecture among S.pombe, plant and invertebrate snRNA promoters. Factors recognizing the spUSE can be detected in whole cell extracts by DNase I footprinting and competition studies show that the binding of these factors correlates with transcriptional activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays and gel-filtration chromatography revealed a native molecular mass of ~200 kDa for the spUSE binding activity. Two polypeptides of molecular masses 25 and 65 kDa were purified by virtue of their ability to specifically bind the spUSE.


In most organisms the majority of the spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) are synthesized by RNA polymerase II (pol II), with the exception of the U6 snRNA, which is synthesized by RNA polymerase III (pol III) (reviewed in 1–3). The promoters of snRNA genes differ from those of other gene classes in several respects. First, snRNA genes usually contain transcriptional elements that are unique to this gene group (4,5). Secondly, the promoters of both RNA pol II and RNA pol III snRNA genes within a species are usually structurally related (6–10). Thirdly, although snRNA promoters are highly conserved within the same species, they vary greatly between different genera indicating that they have evolved rapidly (9–18).

Unlike the U6 gene, transcription of vertebrate pol II snRNA genes in cellular extracts has proven to be very difficult. Transcription of human U1 and U2 snRNA genes in HeLa cell extracts leads to synthesis not of mature snRNAs, but of large molecules aberrantly initiated upstream from the normal 5′-ends (19,20). Nevertheless, transient expression in vivo and the use of G-less cassette constructs in vitro showed that vertebrate snRNA promoters, including the U6 promoter, contain two major elements: a loosely conserved proximal sequence element (PSE) located at about position –55 relative to the transcription initiation site, and a well-conserved distal sequence element (DSE) located at around –200 (reviewed in 1–3). The PSE is a basal promoter element that defines the transcription start site and is the binding site for the factor SNAPc/PTF (21,22). The DSE functions as an enhancer and is required for maximal promoter activity. In addition to the PSE and DSE, the U6 gene promoter also contains an essential TATA box at –25 (7,8).

In contrast, the pol II snRNA genes of Drosophila (23), sea urchin (24,25), nematode (26) and dicotyledonous plants (27) can be accurately transcribed in homologous cell extracts. Characterization of snRNA promoters in these in vitro transcriptional systems as well as in vivo showed that in most cases they are bipartite. In Drosophila, both pol II and pol III snRNA gene promoters contain an essential 21 bp sequence element, called the PSEA, ~42 bp upstream of the transcription start site (17). The PSEB, a well-conserved 8 bp element, is also present at about –24 in the 5′ flanking region of pol II snRNA gene promoters. Instead of a PSEB sequence, the U6 promoter of Drosophila contains a canonical TATA box at a similar position (17). Surprisingly, the Drosophila U1 and U6 PSEAs cannot functionally substitute for each other; rather, the determination of RNA polymerase specificity is an intrinsic property of the PSEA sequences themselves (28). In the sea urchin, a sequence element termed the suPSE is located at about –55 upstream of the transcription start site in both pol II and pol III snRNA gene promoters (15,18,29). Despite the lack of sequence similarity between them, the U1 and U2 PSEs can substitute for the U6 PSE. Plant snRNA gene promoters consist of an upstream sequence element (USE) and a TATA box at –30 (10,12). The USE is a plant snRNA gene-specific enhancer and the spacing between the USE and TATA box is the major determinant of RNA polymerase specificity of plant snRNA genes (10,12).

snRNA gene expression in single-cell organisms is less well-characterized. Comparison of the 5′ flanking sequences of the U1 to U6 genes in fission yeast revealed the conservation of a TATA box 25 bp upstream of the transcription start site (30). One difference between pol II snRNA gene promoters (U1 to U5) and the pol III U6 promoter in this organism is that the sequences surrounding the TATA box in the pol II snRNA gene promoters are somewhat conserved, with a consensus sequence AtTTAcTATAWAYRY-RgGT (30). However, the functions of these sequences are unknown.

In this study we have investigated the transcription of Schizosaccharomyces pombe U2 snRNA gene in vivo and in vitro. Our results indicate that the S.pombe U2 promoter contains at least two essential elements: the S.pombe USE (spUSE) centered at –55 and a TATA box at –26. We have also characterized a protein complex that binds to the spUSE.


Plasmid construction

Plasmid pSP-MU2, which contains the marked U2 gene, has been described previously (31). PCR was used to generate the U2 promoter deletion mutants (D1 to D6) with pSP-MU2 as the PCR template. The common 3′ primer used for PCR was: 5′-ACTGGATCCCCTCACATCCTAAACCATCCA-3′. The different 5′ oligonucleotides were as follows: U2D1, 5′-ACTGGATCCTCTGGTAACAAGTTTGTCAGC-3′; U2D2, 5′-ACTGGATCCGACCACAAAATTGGGACTGCGA-3′; U2D3, 5′-ACTGGATCCGACTGCGAAGTAATCTCAGG-3′; U2D4, 5′-ACTGGATCCTCAGGGTTCGGGTTTATTTATGAGA-3′; U2D5, 5′-ACAGGATCCATGAGATTTACTATATATACAGGT-3′; U2D6, 5′-ACTGGATCCTATATATACAGGTACTCGTG-3′. BamHI sites are underlined. The PCR products were digested with BamHI and cloned into the pSP1 vector (31). The sequences and orientation of the inserts were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis was performed using the method of Kunkel (32) to make U2 promoter linker-scanning mutants (PL1 to PL4). The sequences of the primers were as follows: U2PM1, 5′-TCGGGTTTATTTATTGTCGACGGTATATATACAG-3′; U2PM2, 5′-TATTTATGAGATTTACGTCGACCCTAGGTACT-3′; U2PM3, 5′-GATTTACTATATATACTGTCGACTGTGCATTT-3′; U2PM4, 5′-TATACAGGTACTCACTTCGTCGACCCGGTATTCTC-3′. The bold letters indicate the changed nucleotides in each mutant.

pUC-U6 was constructed by ligation of a 1.5 kb HincII fragment containing the S.pombe U6 gene (derived from pU6-5, a generous gift from Dr Y.Oshima) with pUC119. Plasmid ADH-U2 was prepared as follows. The DNA fragment containing the U2 coding region plus 64 nt of 3′ flanking sequences was obtained by PCR and cloned into pSP1. The resultant plasmid was named pSP-U2SAL. The oligonucleotides used for PCR were: U2SAL, 5′-TTCGTCGACCGGTATTCTCTCTTTGCCT-3′; SNU2-3′, 5′-ACGGGATCCCCTCACATCCTAAACCATCCA-3′. The SalI and BamHI sites are underlined. The ADH promoter was cut from plasmid pART3 (generously provided by Dr David Beach) with SalI and cloned into the SalI site of pSP-U2SAL. The orientation of the ADH promoter was confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Preparation of competitor DNA

For double-stranded spUSE competitor two oligonucleotides, D5F (5′-CTAGTTCAGGGTTCGGGTTTATTTA-3′) and D5R (5′-CTAGTAAATAAACCCGAACCCTGAA-3′) were annealed. The annealed fragment was then ligated with pSP1 linearized with SpeI. PCR, using T3 and T7 promoter primers complementary to vector sequences, was used to screen for clones containing inserts. The clone, pSP-D5, which contains two copies of spUSE was isolated and sequenced. To make specific competitor DNA, the 111 bp spUSE-containing EcoRI–SacI fragment was excised from pSP-D5 and gel-purified. Double-stranded –20/+4 region competitors were also prepared in the same way. The two oligonucleotides used for cloning were: IF (5′-CTAGTCATTTGGTTCGGTATTCTCTCTA-3′) and IR (5′-CTAGTAGAGAGAATACCGAACCAAATGA-3′).

RNase T1 protection assay

The U2 promoter deletion mutants and the linker-scanning mutants were transformed into fission yeast strain SP130 (h ade6-M210 leu1-32) and colonies were selected on minimal medium + adenine plates. Total RNAs were purified from leu+ transformants and analyzed by RNase T1 protection assay as described previously (31). The antisense RNA probe used is complementary to the marked U2 RNA as shown in Figure Figure22A.

Figure 2
Sequences upstream of the TATA box are required for U2 transcription. (A) Diagram of the U2 promoter deletion mutants. The U2 gene was marked by introducing a SacI site between nucleotides 40 and 41 in the coding region. (B) In vitro transcription. ...

In vitro transcription

Schizosaccharomyces pombe whole cell extract preparation and in vitro transcription reactions were done as described (33,34), except that the transcription reactions were performed for 1 h at room temperature. In addition, 600 ng of template DNA, the optimal DNA concentration determined by titration, was used in each reaction. In vitro transcription was also performed in the presence of increasing amounts of spUSE and the –20/+4 oligonucleotides, or α-amanitin to test their effects on U2 transcription. Furthermore, the U6 snRNA gene and the ADH promoter were transcribed in the same extract in the presence of different concentrations of α-amanitin and used as controls to determine the RNA polymerase specificity of U2 gene transcription. PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics) analysis was used to quantitate the transcripts and the transcription of the mutants is expressed as a percentage of that derived from the wild-type promoter. Primer extension was performed to map the 5′-ends of the marked U2 transcripts as described previously (31). The oligonucleotide used for primer extension, U2PE (5′-AACTGAAAAGAACAGAG-3′), is complementary to bases 44–60 of the marked U2 gene.

DNase I footprinting

A DNA fragment extending from –120 upstream of the transcription start site to +60 in the coding region was prepared by PCR and used for DNase I footprinting. The primers used for PCR were U2D1 and U2PE described above. The DNA fragment was labeled with [γ-32P]ATP by labeling one of the primers with T4 polynucleotide kinase before PCR. Aliquots of the same whole cell extract used for in vitro transcription reactions described above were used for DNase I footprinting. The DNase I footprinting assay was performed as described (35) except that all the steps were carried out at room temperature. Buffer Z′ with 100 mM KCl was used. The final products were run on a 7% acrylamide/8 M urea sequencing gel. In addition, DNase I footprinting was also performed in the presence of increasing amounts of the pUSE or the –20/+4 competitors to test the sequence specificity of the DNase I footprint.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)

The T7 primer was annealed to single-stranded DNA made from plasmid pSP-D5 and extended using Klenow fragment and [α-32P]dCTP. The product was digested with EcoRI and NotI, and the resulting 90 bp spUSE fragment was then gel purified. For the binding assays 20 000 c.p.m. of the probe was incubated for 20 min at room temperature with either 1 µl of S.pombe whole cell extract or 9 µl of column fractions in a 30 µl reaction volume containing 50 mM HEPES pH 7.8, 90 mM potassium glutamate, 10 mM magnesium acetate, 5 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol, 0.75% PEG-3350 and 6 µg of poly(dI.dC) (Pharmacia). The DNA–protein complexes were resolved on native 4% polyacrylamide gels as described (36).

Gel-filtration chromatography

A 90 ml Sepharose 4B column was prepared and calibrated according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer (Bio-Rad). Gel-filtration chromatography was carried out in a buffer containing 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 20% glycerol, 10 mM MgSO4, 10 mM EGTA and 5 mM DTT.

DNA affinity purification of spUSE binding proteins

The spUSE target DNA was obtained by PCR using an un-biotinylated T3 and 5′ biotinylated T7 promoter primers, and pSP-D5 as template. The control biotinylated DNA was obtained the same way except that insertless pSP1 vector was used as the PCR template. Biotinylated spUSE DNA or control DNA (1 µg) was incubated with 1.0 mg Dynabeads M-280 streptavidin (Dynal, Inc., Oslo, Norway) in 1× binding and washing buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA and 1 M NaCl) for 30 min at room temperature. After washing three times with 1× binding and washing buffer, the beads were re-suspended in 100 µl Buffer A (50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 90 mM potassium glutamate, 10 mM magnesium acetate, 5 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol, 0.75% PEG-3350). Fraction 45 (320 µl; obtained by gel-filtration chromatography as described above) was incubated with 40 µl of DNA-coupled Dynabeads in 1× Buffer A for 30 min at room temperature. The beads were then washed three times with Buffer A containing 16 µg/ml poly(dI.dC). Finally, the bound proteins were eluted with 0.5 M NaCl, separated on a 12.5% SDS–polyacrylamide gel and visualized by silver staining.


Transcription of the S.pombe U2 snRNA gene is accurately initiated in vitro

A U2 snRNA gene marked by the introduction of a SacI site between nucleotides 40 and 41 in the coding region (31) was used as a transcription template in an S.pombe whole cell extract. As shown in Figure Figure1A,1A, an RNA band of the expected size (193 nt) was obtained in lane 2 but not in lane 1 in which pSP1 vector was used. We have previously shown that this marked U2 gene initiates transcription correctly in vivo (31). In order to confirm the identity of the RNA synthesized in vitro, primer extension was performed using U2PE, an oligonucleotide complementary to the SacI site at its 3′-end and AMV reverse transcriptase. The transcription initiation site was determined by electrophoresing the primer extension products adjacent to a DNA sequence ladder primed with the same end-labeled oligonucleotide (Fig. (Fig.1B).1B). Our results indicate that the in vitro transcribed RNA is indeed U2 snRNA and that the marked U2 gene initiates transcription in vitro at the same A residue as in vivo (Fig. (Fig.1B,1B, compare lane 6 with lane 5). As the U2 transcripts generated in vitro are of the expected length and are correctly initiated, it is likely that 3′-end formation also occurs accurately in the extract. To determine which RNA polymerase is utilized, we assayed transcription from the S.pombe U2 and ADH promoters in parallel in the same extract and in the presence of different concentrations of α-amanitin (Fig. (Fig.1C, 1C, left panel). U2 transcription is not detectably inhibited at 5 µg/ml of α-amanitin (Fig. (Fig.1C,1C, compare lane 1 with lane 2) and is reduced to 85.5 and 8.1% of control level in the presence of 10 and 25 µg/ml of α-amanitin, respectively (Fig. (Fig.1C,1C, compare lanes 3 and 4 with lane 1). Transcription derived from the S.pombe ADH promoter has approximately the same α-amanitin sensitivity as that from the U2 promoter (Fig. (Fig.1C,1C, lanes 5–8). In addition, we also transcribed the S.pombe U6 gene in the same whole cell extract in the presence of different concentrations of α-amanitin. As shown in the right panel of Figure Figure1C,1C, 20 µg/ml of α-amanitin had no effect on U6 transcription (lane 10). At 200 µg/ml of α-amanitin, U6 transcription was only reduced to 60% of the level seen in the absence of inhibitor (Fig. (Fig.1C,1C, compare lane 11 with lane 9). Twenty per cent of the control level of U6 transcription was observed even at 400 µg/ml of α-amanitin (Fig. (Fig.1C, 1C, lane 12), correlating well with published data showing that S.pombe RNA pol III is more resistant to this inhibitor than the corresponding mammalian enzyme (37).

Figure 1
In vitro transcription of the S.pombe U2 snRNA gene. (A) In vitro transcription. An aliquot of 600 ng of pSP1 vector alone (lane 1) or plasmid pSP-MU2 (lane 2) were incubated with 3 µl of S.pombe whole cell extract as described (33,34) except ...

Sequences upstream of the TATA box are required for U2 gene transcription in vivo and in vitro

A series of U2 promoter deletion mutants was made (Fig. (Fig.2A)2A) to determine the minimal region required for transcription. As shown in Figure Figure2B,2B, deletion of the U2 promoter to –120 had no effect on transcription in vitro (compare lane 3 with lane 2), while deletion to –92 reduced the transcription level to only 50% of the wild-type level (compare lane 4 with lane 2). Further deletion of the U2 promoter to –78 and –63 did not reduce U2 transcription further (Fig. (Fig.2B,2B, compare lanes 5 and 6 with lane 4) suggesting that only the sequences between –120 and –92 had some effect on U2 transcription in vitro. Deletion of the U2 promoter to –44 further reduced U2 transcription to only 2% of the wild-type level (Fig. (Fig.2B,2B, compare lane 7 with lane 2). This result indicates that the sequence between –63 and –44 is required for maintenance of a high level of U2 transcription. Finally, deletion of the U2 promoter to –34, 1 nt upstream of the TATA box, abolished U2 transcription completely (Fig. (Fig.2B,2B, lane 8) indicating that the TATA box alone is not sufficient to direct U2 transcription in vitro and that upstream sequences are required.

We next transformed the wild-type U2 promoter construct and the U2 promoter deletion mutants into a leu S.pombe strain (SP130). Total RNAs were extracted from leu+ transformants and analyzed by RNase T1 protection of the antisense RNA probe shown in Figure Figure2A.2A. In this experiment the antisense RNA probe was in excess. The copy number of the pSP1 vector is essentially constant as RNAs isolated from either single colonies or from pools of 10 colonies gave the same results when assayed in parallel (data not shown). The endogenous U2 snRNA (Fig. (Fig.2C,2C, e-U2) serves as an internal control. In contrast to the in vitro system, deletion of the U2 promoter to position –63 had no effect on U2 transcription in vivo (Fig. (Fig.2C, 2C, lanes 4–7). As was seen in vitro (Fig. (Fig.2B),2B), further deletion of the U2 promoter to position –44 reduced U2 transcription to only 6.5% of the wild-type level in vivo (Fig. (Fig.2C,2C, lane 8); and deletion of U2 promoter to –34 further debilitated, but did not completely abrogate, U2 transcription (Fig. (Fig.2C,2C, lane 9). In summary, the sequence between positions –63 and –44 is required for high level U2 expression in vivo and in vitro. We refer to this element as the spUSE. This result differs from an earlier report, which showed that the sequences upstream of the TATA box were not required (38).

Sequences surrounding the TATA box affect U2 transcription in vitro

Comparison of the S.pombe U1 to U5 pol II snRNA gene promoters showed that the sequences surrounding the TATA box in these promoters are somewhat conserved (30,38). However, the significance of this conservation was not clear nor was it known if sequences downstream of the TATA box were essential for transcription. Results shown in Figure Figure22 suggest that the sequences immediately upstream of the TATA box may contribute to the basal level of transcription. In order to examine the function of the sequences surrounding the TATA box in more detail we made the series of linker-scanning mutations shown in Figure Figure3A3A and tested their effect on U2 transcription in vitro and in vivo (Fig. (Fig.3B3B and C). In vitro, the TATA box is essential as mutation of this sequence abolished U2 transcription (Fig. (Fig.3B,3B, lane 3). Sequences immediately upstream and downstream of the TATA box are also required as mutation of these sequences reduced U2 transcription to ~48 or 45% of the wild-type level (Fig. (Fig.3B, 3B, compare lanes 2 and 4 with lane 1). Mutation of the sequence upstream of position –4 increased transcription by 50% over that of the wild-type U2 promoter (Fig. (Fig.3B, 3B, compare lane 5 with lane 1). We next used RNase T1 protection of the antisense RNA probe shown in Figure Figure2A 2A to measure the steady-state levels of transcripts derived from the linker-scanning mutants in vivo. Again, the antisense RNA probe was in excess. As shown in Figure Figure3C,3C, mutation of the TATA box abolished U2 transcription (Fig. (Fig.3C,3C, lane 4) whereas mutation of the sequences surrounding the TATA box or between –20 and –4 upstream of the transcription initiation site had no effect on U2 expression (Fig. (Fig.3C,3C, lanes 3, 5 and 6). Primer extension analysis of RNAs derived from transcription of these linker-scanning mutants in vivo and in vitro (data not shown) indicates that they initiate at the same nucleotide as in the wild-type construct. Thus, the TATA box is essential for U2 transcription in vivo and in vitro.

Figure 3
Role of the TATA box and adjacent sequences on U2 transcription. (A) Diagram of the U2 promoter linker-scanning mutants. (B) In vitro transcription. Plasmid pSP-MU2 and the U2 promoter linker-scanning mutants were transcribed in whole cell extract ...

The binding of proteins to the U2 promoter correlates with transcription in vitro

DNase I footprinting was used to identify the binding sites of proteins from a transcriptionally active whole cell extract on the U2 promoter. A probe extending from –120 upstream of the transcription start site to +60 in the coding region was generated by PCR using a 5′-end-labeled oligonucleotide, and was incubated with whole cell extract and treated with DNase I. As shown in Figure Figure44 (left panel), the sequence between –63 and –44 (spUSE) on the sense strand is protected from DNase I digestion in the presence of a whole cell S.pombe extract. In addition, the sequences around the transcription initiation site are also protected. We refer to these sequences as the –20/+4 element. In contrast, there is only partial protection of certain nucleotides (Fig. (Fig.4,4, asterisks) within, and adjacent to, the TATA box sequence. This weak footprint is similar to those seen on the TATA boxes of mRNA gene promoters from higher eukaryotes (39). It may result from binding of a factor and/or distortion of the DNA helix. On the antisense strand, as on the sense strand, strong protection was seen on the –20/+4 region and the spUSE, with partial protection of the TATA box and sequences between the TATA box and the –20/+4 region (Fig. (Fig.4,4, right panel, asterisks). In addition, there is enhanced DNase I cleavage of the sequences between the TATA box and spUSE (Fig. (Fig.4,4, dots). We then performed DNase I footprinting analysis in the presence of double-stranded DNA competitors derived from the spUSE or from the –20/+4 region to test the specificity of protein binding. The results are shown in Figure Figure5A.5A. The DNase I footprint between –63 and –44 became weaker as the amount of spUSE was increased whereas the footprint around the transcription initiation site was unaffected (Fig. (Fig.5A,5A, lanes 3–5). Similarly, the DNase I footprint around the transcription initiation site was replaced with increasing amounts of the –20/+4 competitor DNA whereas the DNase I footprint between –63 and –44 was not (Fig. (Fig.5A,5A, lanes 6–8). As there is no cross-competition, these data suggest that different factors bind to the spUSE and the –20/+4 region and that the binding is sequence-specific.

Figure 4
DNase I footprinting of the U2 promoter. (Left) DNase I footprinting of the sense strand. U2D1 was labeled with [γ-32P]ATP. The DNA sequence ladders were prepared using the same labeled primer. (Right) DNase I footprinting ...
Figure 5
The binding of proteins to the spUSE and –20/+4 region correlates with U2 transcription. (A) The effect of spUSE and –20/+4 competitors on DNase I footprinting on the sense strand of the U2 promoter ...

To determine if protein binding to spUSE and the –20/+4 region correlates with transcription, we transcribed the U2 gene in vitro in the presence of increasing amounts of spUSE or –20/+4 competitors. As shown in Figure Figure5B,5B, transcription of the U2 gene was reduced dramatically with increasing amounts of spUSE (compare lanes 2–4 with lane 1). A 5-fold excess of spUSE competitor reduces U2 transcription to 30% of the level seen in the absence of competitor (Fig. (Fig.5B,5B, compare lane 2 with lane 1) and a 20-fold excess of spUSE competitor further reduces transcription to 13% (Fig. (Fig.5B,5B, compare lane 4 with lane 1). Higher concentrations of spUSE did not reduce U2 transcription further (data not shown) suggesting that spUSE may function as an activator element. In contrast, transcription increases as the amount of the –20/+4 region competitor is increased (Fig. (Fig.5B, 5B, compare lanes 5–7 with lane 1) suggesting that the corresponding protein(s) may function as a repressor. These results are consistent with the effects of the linker-scanning mutations on in vitro transcription, as shown in Figure Figure3B, 3B, and correlate well with the competition of the DNase I footprints shown in Figure Figure5A.5A. Nevertheless, mutation of part of the –20/+4 sequence has no detectable effect on U2 transcription in vivo (Fig. (Fig.33C).

Characterization of a transcription factor that binds to the spUSE element

We next used the spUSE as a probe in EMSAs. Using an S.pombe whole cell extract, at least four protein–DNA complexes (a–d) were observed (Fig. (Fig.6A,6A, lane 2). Addition of competitor oligonucleotides demonstrated the sequence specificity of these interactions, since an excess of the unlabeled spUSE competed for complex formation (Fig. (Fig.6A,6A, lanes 3 and 4) while addition of non-specific DNA oligonucleotides did not (Fig. (Fig.6A,6A, lanes 5 and 6). The appearance of multiple protein–DNA complexes in the EMSA suggests that the protein binding activity of spUSE may be a multi-subunit protein complex that partially dissociates during electrophoresis. The overall mass of this complex was estimated by gel-filtration chromatography (Fig. (Fig.6B).6B). The spUSE binding activity, as determined by the EMSA, peaked at fraction 45 on a Sephadex 4B column, indicating a molecular weight of ~200 kDa for this complex. Magnetic streptavidin beads (Dynabeads, M280-streptavidin; Dynal, Inc.) coupled with biotinylated spUSE were used to purify the proteins that interact with the spUSE. As shown in Figure Figure6C,6C, two proteins with molecular masses of 25 and 65 kDa were detected by SDS–PAGE and silver staining, respectively (Fig. (Fig.6C,6C, lane 2). The specificity of binding of these two proteins was demonstrated by their absence in lane 3 (Fig. (Fig.6C),6C), where an excess of un-biotinylated spUSE competitor was added, and in lane 1 (Fig. (Fig.6C),6C), where only unrelated vector DNA was coupled to the magnetic beads. Our data suggests that the transcription factor that binds to the spUSE contains at least two different proteins.

Figure 6
Characterization of spUSE binding activity in an S.pombe whole cell extract. (A) A double-stranded, radiolabeled spUSE probe was incubated with extract and analyzed by EMSA as detailed in Materials and Methods. For each sample, 20 000 c.p.m. (4 fmol) ...


Our results demonstrate that, like the sea urchin U2 (15,18,29) and plant snRNA gene promoters (10,12), the S.pombe U2 snRNA promoter is bipartite. It contains at least two essential promoter elements: the spUSE centered at –55 and a TATA box at –26. The TATA box is a basal element as mutation of this sequence abolishes transcription in vivo and in vitro (Fig. (Fig.3B3B and C). In contrast, the spUSE functions as an activator because its deletion reduces U2 transcription in vivo and in vitro (Fig. (Fig.2B2B and C). Our results differ from those reported in an earlier study of U2 snRNA gene expression in fission yeast, which showed that the sequences upstream of the TATA box were not required (38). These researchers relied on a primer extension assay using an oligonucleotide that differed from the wild-type U2 sequence at a single nucleotide at its 3′-end to measure transcription from an exogenous U2 gene marked by a single nucleotide insertion. It is possible that this assay did not completely distinguish between transcripts derived from the endogenous and exogenous U2 genes.

Examination of the S.pombe U4 and U5 promoter sequences shows that spUSE-like elements also exist in these promoters at similar positions (Fig. (Fig.55C). Four complexes, a–d, are observed to form on the U2 spUSE in EMSAs (Fig. (Fig.6A).6A). These complexes co-migrate during Sephadex 4B chromatography and elute at an apparent molecular weight of ~200 kDa (Fig. (Fig.6B).6B). The peak fraction from the Sephadex 4B column contains two polypeptides of 25 and 65 kDa that specifically bind to the spUSE (Fig. (Fig.6C).6C). As the combined molecular mass of these peptides is approximately half that estimated for the spUSE factor by gel-filtration chromatography, it is possible that they may bind as a heterotetramer containing two copies of each peptide. The spUSE sequence consists of two imperfect direct repeats and we speculate that each repeat may constitute a half-site that binds one copy of the 25 and 65 kDa peptides.

Our analysis of the S.pombe U2 promoter indicates that the sequences surrounding the TATA box contribute to transcription in vitro. The sequences immediately upstream and downstream of the TATA box show either enhanced DNase I cleavage or partial protection from cleavage when proteins from the homologous extract are bound to the promoter (Fig. (Fig.4),4), indicating that they may contribute to the formation or stability of the transcription initiation complex. However, mutation of these sequences has little effect on the level of U2 snRNA in vivo (Figs (Figs2C2C and and3C).3C). As these sequences are semi-conserved in the fission yeast U1 to U5 snRNA promoters but not in the U6 promoter (30,38), it is possible that they have an in vivo function that was not detected in our assay.

A concentration of >25 µg/ml of α-amanitin is required to completely inhibit transcription from the S.pombe U2 and ADH promoters in vitro (Fig. (Fig.11C). It was previously reported that transcription by S.pombe pol II was abrogated by 10 µg/ml of this inhibitor (40,41). However, in these experiments the templates used were heterologous. Woontner and Jaehning. (40) used a chimera composed of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL4 UAS, the S.cerevisiae CYC1 TATA box and initiation region, fused to a G-less cassette. Flanagan et al. (41) used the Adenovirus 2 Major Late promoter fused to a G-less cassette. In both cases, transcription levels appear to have been lower than those observed by us from the S.pombe U2 and ADH promoters. Thus, where we observe a 15% reduction in U2 and ADH promoter derived transcription at 10 µg/ml of α-amanitin, it is likely that the level of transcription observed by these workers was too low to be detectable. In contrast to S.pombe, in higher eukaryotes complete inhibition of RNA pol II transcription occurs at much lower concentrations (2–10 µg/ml) of α-amanitin (42). The largest subunit of S.pombe RNA pol II contains a substitution of the conserved Asn residue at position 775 of domain F by Ile (43). This residue and its neighbors in domain F are highly conserved among higher eukaryotes. An α-amanitin resistant mutant of mouse RNA pol II contains an Asn to Asp mutation in domain F (44). Furthermore, in the largest subunit of S.cerevisiae pol II there is a Ser residue at position 769, which corresponds to Ile 775 in the S.pombe homolog. As suggested by Azuma et al. (43), these substitutions may account for the higher resistance of the fungal RNA pol II enzymes to α-amanitin (this work, 45). Schizosaccharomyces pombe RNA pol III is also less sensitive to α-amanitin than the corresponding enzyme from metazoans. Using α-amanitin at a concentration of 200 µg/ml is usually sufficient to completely inhibit RNA pol III in higher eukaryotes (42,46,47); in contrast, at this concentration, S.pombe U6 transcription is barely affected (Fig. (Fig.1C).1C). It was recently shown that fairly high levels of 7SL transcription by S.pombe RNA pol III are observed even in the presence of 1 mg/ml α-amanitin (37). These results suggest that in S.pombe both RNA pol II and RNA pol III are more robust to α-amanitin than the corresponding metazoan enzymes.

As the S.pombe U2 snRNA gene is accurately transcribed in vitro the powerful combination of biochemical and genetic techniques can be brought to bear on studying the mechanisms involved in the synthesis of this interesting class of RNAs.


We thank Dr Y.Oshima for the S.pombe U6 gene, Dr D.Beach for the pART3 vector and Sabrina Walthall for assistance with chromatography. This work was supported by NIH grant RO1GM51908 to S.M.L.-R.


1. Dahlberg J.E. and Lund,E. (1988). The genes and transcription of the major small nuclear RNAs. In Berstiel,M.L. (ed.), Structure and Function of Major and Minor Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Particles. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 38––70.70.
2. Hernandez N., Lobo,S., Lister,J., Ifill,S., Ratnasabapathy,R., Sheldon,M. and Johal,L. (1990) Transcription of the human U2 and U6 RNA genes. Mol. Biol. Rep., 14, 167. [PubMed]
3. Lobo S.M. and Hernandez,N. (1994) Transcription of snRNA Genes by RNA Polymerases II and III. Raven Press, New York, NY.
4. Skuzeski J.M., Lund,E., Murphy,J.T., Steinberg,T.H., Burgess,R.R. and Dahlberg,J.E. (1984) Synthesis of human U1 RNA. II. Identification of two regions of the promoter essential for transcription initiation at position +1. J. Biol. Chem., 259, 8345––8352.8352. [PubMed]
5. Tanaka M., Grossniklaus,U., Herr,W. and Hernandez,N. (1988) Activation of the U2 snRNA promoter by the octamer motif defines a new class of RNA polymerase II enhancer elements. Genes Dev., 2, 1764––1778.1778. [PubMed]
6. Carbon P., Murgo,S., Ebel,J.P., Krol,A., Tebb,G. and Mattaj,L.W. (1987) A common octamer motif binding protein is involved in the transcription of U6 snRNA by RNA polymerase III and U2 snRNA by RNA polymerase II. Cell, 51, 71––79.79. [PubMed]
7. Mattaj I.W., Dathan,N.A., Parry,H.D., Carbon,P. and Krol,A. (1988) Changing the RNA polymerase specificity of U snRNA gene promoters. Cell, 55, 435––442.442. [PubMed]
8. Lobo S.M. and Hernandez,N. (1989) A 7 bp mutation converts a human RNA polymerase II snRNA promoter into an RNA polymerase III promoter. Cell, 58, 55––67.67. [PubMed]
9. Waibel F. and Filipowicz,W. (1990) RNA-polymerase specificity of transcription of Arabidopsis U snRNA genes determined by promoter element spacing. Nature, 346, 199––202.202. [PubMed]
10. Waibel F. and Filipowicz,W. (1990) U6 snRNA genes of Arabidopsis are transcribed by RNA polymerase III but contain the same two upstream promoter elements as RNA polymerase II- transcribed U-snRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res., 18, 3451––3458.3458. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Lo P.C. and Mount,S.M. (1990) Drosophila melanogaster genes for U1 snRNA variants and their expression during development. Nucleic Acids Res., 18, 6971––6979.6979. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Vankan P. and Filipowicz,W. (1989) A U-snRNA gene-specific upstream element and a –30 ‘TATA box’ are required for transcription of the U2 snRNA gene of Arabidopsis thaliana. EMBO J., 8, 3875––3882.3882. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Murgo S., Krol,A. and Carbon,P. (1991) Sequence, organization and transcriptional analysis of a gene encoding a U1 snRNA from the axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum. Gene, 99, 163––170.170. [PubMed]
14. Simmen K.A., Waldschmidt,R., Bernues,J., Parry,H.D., Seifart,K.H. and Mattaj,I.W. (1992) Proximal sequence element factor binding and species specificity in vertebrate U6 snRNA promoters. J. Mol. Biol., 223, 873––884.884. [PubMed]
15. Stefanovic B. and Marzluff,W.F. (1992) Characterization of two developmentally regulated sea urchin U2 small nuclear RNA promoters: a common required TATA sequence and independent proximal and distal elements. Mol. Cell. Biol., 12, 650–660. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Thomas J., Lea,K., Zucker-Aprison,E. and Blumenthal,T. (1990) The spliceosomal snRNAs of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res., 18, 2633––2642.2642. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Zamrod Z., Tyree,C.M., Song,Y. and Stumph,W.E. (1993) In vitro transcription of a Drosophila U1 small nuclear RNA gene requires TATA box-binding protein and two proximal cis-acting elements with stringent spacing requirements. Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 5918––5927.5927. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Wendelburg B.J. and Marzluff,W.F. (1992) Two promoter elements are necessary and sufficient for expression of the sea urchin U1 snRNA gene. Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 3743––3751.3751. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Murphy J.T., Burgess,R.R., Dahlberg,J.E. and Lund,E. (1982) Transcription of a gene for human U1 small nuclear RNA. Cell, 29, 265––274.274. [PubMed]
20. Westin G., Lund,E., Murphy,J.T., Pettersson,U. and Dahlberg,J.E. (1984) Human U2 and U1 RNA genes use similar transcription signals. EMBO J., 3, 3295––3301.3301. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Henry R.W., Sadowski,C.L., Kobayashi,R. and Hernandez,N. (1995) A TBP-TAF complex required for transcription of human snRNA genes by RNA polymerase II and III. Nature, 374, 653––656.656. [PubMed]
22. Yoon J.B., Murphy,S., Bai,L., Wang,Z. and Roeder,R.G. (1995) Proximal sequence element-binding transcription factor (PTF) is a multisubunit complex required for transcription of both RNA polymerase II- and RNA polymerase III-dependent small nuclear RNA genes. Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 2019––2027.2027. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Kamakaka R.T., Tyree,C.M. and Kadonaga,J.T. (1991) Accurate and efficient RNA polymerase II transcription with a soluble nuclear fraction derived from Drosophila embryos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 1024––1028.1028. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Morris G.F. and Marzluff,W.F. (1985) Synthesis of U1 RNA in isolated nuclei from sea urchin embryos: U1 RNA is initiated at the first nucleotide of the RNA. Mol. Cell. Biol., 5, 1143––1150.1150. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Morris G.F., Price,D.H. and Marzluff,W.F. (1986) Synthesis of U1 RNA in a DNA-dependent system from sea urchin embryos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 3674––3678.3678. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Hannon G.E., Hannon,G.J., Maroney,P.A. and Nilsen,T.W. (1994) Transcription of a nematode U1 small nuclear RNA in vitro. 3′-End formation requires cis-acting elements within the coding sequence. J. Biol. Chem., 269, 12387––12390.12390. [PubMed]
27. Filipowicz W., Kiss,T., Marshallsay,C. and Waibel,F. (1990) U-snRNA genes, U-snRNAs and U-snRNPs of higher plants. Mol. Biol. Rep., 14, 125––129.129. [PubMed]
28. Jensen R.C., Wang,Y., Hardin,S.B. and Stumph,W.E. (1998) The proximal sequence element (PSE) plays a major role in establishing the RNA polymerase specificity of Drosophila U-snRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res., 26, 616––622.622. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Li J.M., Parsons,R.A. and Marzluff,W.F. (1994) Transcription of the sea urchin U6 gene in vitro requires a TATA-like box, a proximal sequence element, and sea urchin USF, which binds an essential E box. Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 2191––2200.2200. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Porter G., Brennwald,P. and Wise,J.A. (1990) U1 small nuclear RNA from Schizosaccharomyces pombe has unique and conserved features and is encoded by an essential single-copy gene. Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 2874––2881.2881. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Zhou D., Frendewey,D. and Lobo-Ruppert,S.M. (1999) Pac1p, an RNase III homolog, is required for formation of the 3′ end of U2 snRNA in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. RNA, 5, 1083––1098.1098. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Kunkel T.A. (1985) Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 82, 488––492.492. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Woontner M. and Jaehning,J.A. (1990) Accurate initiation by RNA polymerase II in a whole cell extract from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem., 265, 8979––8982.8982. [PubMed]
34. Woontner M., Wade,P.A., Bonner,J. and Jaehning,J.A. (1991) Transcriptional activation in an improved whole-cell extract from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol., 11, 4555––4560.4560. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Schmitz A. and Galas,D.J. (1980) Sequence-specific interactions of the tight-binding I12-X86 lac repressor with non-operator DNA. Nucleic Acids Res., 8, 487––506.506. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Lobo-Ruppert S.M., McCulloch,V., Meyer,M., Bautista,C., Falkowski,M., Stunnenberg,H.G. and Hernandez,N. (1996) Monoclonal antibodies directed against the amino-terminal domain of human TBP cross-react with TBP from other species. Hybridoma, 15, 55––68.68. [PubMed]
37. Rodicker F., Ossenbuhl,F., Michels,D. and Benecke,B.J. (1999) Faithful in vitro transcription by fission yeast RNA polymerase III reveals unique α-amanitin sensitivity. Gene Expr., 8, 165––174.174. [PubMed]
38. Dandekar T. and Tollervey,D. (1991) Thirty-three nucleotides of 5′ flanking sequence including the ‘TATA’ box are necessary and sufficient for efficient U2 snRNA transcription in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Microbiol., 5, 1621––1625.1625. [PubMed]
39. Schmidt M.C., Zhou,Q. and Berk,A.J. (1989) Sp1 activates transcription without enhancing DNA-binding activity of the TATA box factor. Mol. Cell. Biol., 9, 3299––3307.3307. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Woontner M. and Jaehning,J.A. (1993) Accurate initiation of mRNA synthesis in extracts from Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Kluyveromyces lactis and Candida glabrata. Yeast, 9, 1331––1334.1334. [PubMed]
41. Flanagan P.M., Kelleher,R.J., Feaver,W.J., Lue,N.F., LaPointe,J.W. and Kornberg,R.D. (1990) Resolution of factors required for the initiation of transcription by yeast RNA polymerase II. J. Biol. Chem., 265, 11105––11107.11107. [PubMed]
42. Chambon P. (1975) Eukaryotic nuclear RNA polymerases. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 44, 613––638.638. [PubMed]
43. Azuma Y., Yamagishi,M., Ueshima,R. and Ishihama,A. (1991) Cloning and sequence determination of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe rpb1 gene encoding the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II. Nucleic Acids Res., 19, 461––468.468. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Bartolomei M.S. and Corden,J.L. (1987) Localization of an α-amanitin resistance mutation in the gene encoding the largest subunit of mouse RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell. Biol., 7, 586––594.594. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Schultz L.D. and Hall,B.D. (1976) Transcription in yeast: α-amanitin sensitivity and other properties which distinguish between RNA polymerases I and III. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 73, 1029––1033.1033. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Huet J., Manaud,N., Dieci,G., Peyroche,G., Conesa,C., Lefebvre,O., Ruet,A., Riva,M. and Sentenac,A. (1996) RNA polymerase III and class III transcription factors from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol., 273, 249––267.267. [PubMed]
47. Klekamp M.S. and Weil,P.A. (1982) Specific transcription of homologous class III genes in yeast-soluble cell-free extracts. J. Biol. Chem., 257, 8432––8441.8441. [PubMed]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...