• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of bmjLink to Publisher's site
BMJ. Oct 30, 2004; 329(7473): 989–990.
PMCID: PMC524536

Teaching evidence based medicine

Should be integrated into current clinical scenarios
Chris Del Mar, dean
Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, Qld 4229, Australia (ua.ude.dnob.ffats@raMleDC)
Paul Glasziou, director
Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Oxford OX3 7LF
Dan Mayer, professor of emergency medicine

Teaching clinical epidemiology has always been challenging, seen as too mathematical and remote from normal clinical practice. Evidence based medicine (EBM) evolved to provide the skills needed to manage the potential information overload of modern medical schools, especially at McMaster, the shortest medical programme in the world. Students have to grasp two essential principles of EBM: its empirical approach to optimal clinical decisions (regardless of pathophysiology, does the bottom line of the balance sheet show gain or loss?); and its quantitative expression (how big is that gain or loss?). These require some mastery of epidemiology and statistics, both repellent to many doctors, even in teaching hospitals.1,2 Now most medical programmes in the United States attempt to teach EBM, although few succeed (the two most important barriers being inadequate access to electronic information at the point of care, and inadequate faculty training).3

What are the best ways of teaching this stuff? By breaking its elements into manageable chunks—asking, accessing, appraising, applying. Often a fifth element is added—assessing (box).

Every mode of delivery has been used: lectures, mini-courses; tutorials to help students work through problems; books to do it alone or as an accompaniment to a course4,5; and even subscription websites.

Education of medical students in EBM ranges from passing mention to multi-year courses of over 100 hours. For example, Albany Medical College has a four year compulsory pass-fail EBM course lasting 120 hours over four years. It uses lectures, small group sessions, and written assignments to teach students critical appraisal and clinical decision making and then apply them to various exercises during the clinical years in each of their clinical clerkships. Its evaluation shows an increased appreciation of EBM, an understanding of when it is not being taught well in other parts of the programme, and an improvement in biostatistics and epidemiology performance on standardised examinations.

Less conventional forms of teaching include critically appraised topics, which develop and assess the range of EBM skills. Students pose a clinical question and answer it, presenting the critically appraised topic to their teachers and peer group for grading, (for example, the Sydney PEARLs programme (www.gmp.usyd.edu.au/vguide/educators/ie_features_ebm.html) and the postgraduate Manchester BestBets (www.bestbets.org)). Important markers of success may be: questions initiated by students; brief presentations; small groups; multiple clinical settings; and evaluation. Occasionally these questions and answers have been interesting enough to lead to worthwhile publications and even Cochrane reviews.6-8 Unlike the common and time consuming research projects this exercise focuses on (future) clinicians as users of research rather than producers of it.

Elements of evidence based learning

  • Asking—converting the clinical puzzle into an answerable question
  • Accessing—searching to find the answer to that question
  • Appraising—critically evaluating the evidence to decide if it is, and if so how, reliable and robust
  • Applying—extracting the useful information and addressing the thorny issues of generalisability and “particularis-ability” to decide what clinical action is best
    Often a fifth element is added
  • Assessing—evaluation of the process to integrate this element into the quality improvement cycle

What evidence is there that teaching EBM achieves its aims? A five year old Cochrane review found sparse evidence9—one randomised controlled trial showing that about six hours of journal club time devoted to critical appraisal increased knowledge of this. Two subsequent randomised controlled trials with broader teaching showed a sustained educational benefit across several of the processes of EBM.10,11 A systematic review in this issue shows that integrating the teaching of the steps of EBM with clinical practice is vital to improving attitudes, skills, and behaviour.12 Integration means applying the steps to real and current clinical problems. Thinking is not enough and doing is necessary for success.

Additionally, role modelling may be necessary.13 Unless students see their role models use EBM in practice, they are unlikely to value it as clinically important. Therefore, specific content in their daily clinical education must refer to relevant trials and cohort studies to show how research methods integrate with clinical practice. Teaching EBM may need to focus as much on teachers as on students and registrars.

In postgraduate environments one useful modelling step is modified and question driven journal clubs to enable registrars in hospital or general practice to engage in a communal EBM activity.14 Another way to improve the teaching of EBM in the postgraduate environment is to create evidence teams consisting of registrars and medical students to find evidence in everyday clinical settings. Their evaluation of the evidence can then be evaluated by the consultant on the team, who would be in the best position to evaluate the use of that evidence for the patient.

EBM is here to stay. It has become an essential way of teaching and practising in the uncertain world of medicine. The challenge is to engage the whole healthcare team in learning about it and making it part of the routine of clinical practice.


Competing interests: None declared.


1. Godwin M, Seguin R. Critical appraisal skills of family physicians in Ontario, Canada. BMC Med Educ 2003;3: 10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Young JM, Glasziou P, Ward JE. General practitioners' self ratings of skills in evidence based medicine: validation study. BMJ 2002;324: 950-1. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Green ML. Evidence-based medicine training in internal medicine residency programs a national survey. J Gen Intern Med 2000;15: 129-33. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Glasziou P, Del Mar C, Salisbury J. Evidence-based medicine workbook. Finding and applying the best research evidence to improve patient care. 1st ed. London: BMJ Books, 2003.
5. Mayer D. Essential evidence-based medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
6. Allen C, Glasziou P, Del Mar C. Bed rest: a potentially harmful treatment needing more careful evaluation. Lancet 1999;354: 1229-33. [PubMed]
7. Thomas M, Del Mar C, Glasziou P. How effective are treatments other than antibiotics for acute sore throat? Br J Gen Pract 2000;50: 817-20. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Francis D, Del Mar C, Thomas M, Glasziou P. Non-antibiotic treatments for sore throat (protocol for a Cochrane review). Cochrane Library. Chichester: John Wiley, 2004.
9. Parkes J, Hyde C, Deeks J, Milne R. Teaching critical appraisal skills in health care settings [Cochrane review]. Cochrane Library. Chichester: John Wiley, 2004.
10. Smith CA, Ganschow PS, Reilly BM, Evans AT, McNutt RA, Osei A, et al. Teaching residents evidence-based medicine skills: a controlled trial of effectiveness and assessment of durability. J Gen Intern Med 2000;15: 710-5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Green ML, Ellis PJ. Impact of an evidence-based medicine curriculum based on adult learning theory. J Gen Intern Med 1997;12: 742-50. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Coomarasamy A, Khan KS. What's the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence-based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. BMJ 2004;329: 1017-9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine. How to practise and teach EBM. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
14. Del Mar CB, Glasziou PP. Ways of using evidence-based medicine in general practice. Med J Aust 2001;174: 347-50. [PubMed]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...