• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of mbcLink to Publisher's site
Mol Biol Cell. Oct 2004; 15(10): 4395–4405.
PMCID: PMC519135

The Essential Role of PP1β in Drosophila Is to Regulate Nonmuscle MyosinD in Box

Lawrence Goldstein, Monitoring Editor

Abstract

Reversible phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain (MRLC) is a key regulatory mechanism controlling myosin activity and thus regulating the actin/myosin cytoskeleton. We show that Drosophila PP1β, a specific isoform of serine/threonine protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), regulates nonmuscle myosin and that this is the essential role of PP1β. Loss of PP1β leads to increased levels of phosphorylated nonmuscle MRLC (Sqh) and actin disorganisation; these phenotypes can be suppressed by reducing the amount of active myosin. Drosophila has two nonmuscle myosin targeting subunits, one of which (MYPT-75D) resembles MYPT3, binds specifically to PP1β, and activates PP1β's Sqh phosphatase activity. Expression of a mutant form of MYPT-75D that is unable to bind PP1 results in elevation of Sqh phosphorylation in vivo and leads to phenotypes that can also be suppressed by reducing the amount of active myosin. The similarity between fly and human PP1β and MYPT genes suggests this role may be conserved.

INTRODUCTION

Nonmuscle myosin II, a molecular motor closely related to vertebrate smooth muscle myosin, powers the actomyosin cytoskeleton. It is required for the coordinated changes in the shape and position of individual cells during morphogenesis as well as for cytokinesis and other cell movements. Nonmuscle myosin II activity is also modulated by metastasis-related and tumor suppressor genes (reviewed Bresnick, 1999 blue right-pointing triangle; Matsumura et al., 2001 blue right-pointing triangle; Sellers, 2000 blue right-pointing triangle; Somlyo and Somlyo, 2000 blue right-pointing triangle).

The regulation of nonmuscle myosin is thought to be broadly similar to that of vertebrate smooth muscle myosin (Bresnick, 1999 blue right-pointing triangle; Sellers, 2000 blue right-pointing triangle). Contraction and relaxation of vertebrate smooth muscle are regulated by the reversible phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain (MRLC), principally on Ser-19. The motor activity of smooth muscle myosin is regulated by the balance of activatory phosphorylation, leading to muscle contraction, and inhibitory dephosphorylation, leading to relaxation. The spectrum of stimulating kinases includes myosin light-chain kinase (MLCK), Rho-associated protein kinase (ROK), p21-associated kinase (PAK), integrin-linked kinase (ILK) and leucine zipper–interacting protein kinase (Dlk/ZIP kinase; Somlyo and Somlyo, 2000 blue right-pointing triangle; MacDonald et al., 2001 blue right-pointing triangle; Winter et al., 2001 blue right-pointing triangle; Kiss et al., 2002 blue right-pointing triangle). The antagonistic protein phosphatase is the catalytic subunit of type 1 serine/threonine protein phosphatase (PP1c) in association with its myosin phosphatase targeting subunit MYPT1 or MYPT2, and a small subunit of unknown function (reviewed by Hartshorne, 1998 blue right-pointing triangle). These kinases and phosphatases are themselves subject to regulation by reversible phosphorylation, for example ROK not only phosphorylates and activates MRLC, but also phosphorylates MYPT1 and inhibits MRLC dephosphorylation (reviewed Kaibuchi et al., 1999 blue right-pointing triangle; Somlyo and Somlyo, 2000 blue right-pointing triangle). The nonmuscle roles of these myosin-regulating kinases are less clear, though at least one (ROK) also regulates non-muscle myosin II in both mammals and Drosophila. Similarly, though PP1 is often assumed to be the major non-muscle MRLC phosphatase, PP2A has also been implicated (Holst et al., 2002 blue right-pointing triangle). The various phosphorylation events have been investigated biochemically, but little is known about their physiological significance, particularly in nonmuscle cells.

Drosophila nonmuscle myosin II heavy chain zipper (zip) and regulatory light chain spaghetti squash (sqh) are essential for the normal development of a very wide range of cells and tissues (Karess et al., 1991 blue right-pointing triangle; Young et al., 1993 blue right-pointing triangle; Edwards and Kiehart, 1996 blue right-pointing triangle; Hudson and Cooley, 2002 blue right-pointing triangle). Drosophila Rho-kinase (Drok) phosphorylates both Sqh and DMBS (the single Drosophila homolog of MYPT1/2; Mizuno et al., 2002 blue right-pointing triangle; Tan et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle). By analogy to the vertebrate smooth muscle system it was proposed that this phosphorylation activates myosin and inhibits myosin phosphatase.

PP1 is involved in the regulation of many cellular functions including glycogen metabolism, muscle contraction, and mitosis (reviewed Bollen, 2001 blue right-pointing triangle; Cohen, 2002 blue right-pointing triangle). In Drosophila, the four genes encoding isoforms of PP1c are named by their chromosome location and subtype: PP1β9C, PP1α13C, PP1α87B, and PP1α96A (Dombrádi et al., 1990b blue right-pointing triangle, 1993 blue right-pointing triangle). Of these, PP1α87B contributes 80% of the total PP1 activity, therefore the phenotypes of PP1α87B loss of function mutants (Axton et al., 1990 blue right-pointing triangle; Dombrádi et al., 1990a blue right-pointing triangle; Baksa et al., 1993 blue right-pointing triangle) may be due to a loss of overall PP1 activity, rather than identifying specific functions unique to the PP1α87B protein. Mice and humans have three PP1 genes: PP1α and PP1γ are related to the fly PP1α genes, although PP1δ (also known as PP1β) corresponds to fly PP1β. Of the mammalian genes, functional analysis by gene knockout in mice has so far only been performed for PP1γ (Varmuza et al., 1999 blue right-pointing triangle). This knockout eliminated both the widely expressed PP1γ 1 and the testis-specific PP1γ 2. Homozygous mutant female mice were viable and fertile; homozygous mutant males were viable but sterile, with defects in spermatogenesis. Presumably the somatic and female germline functions of PP1γ are redundant with PP1α and/or PP1δ.

The in vitro biochemical activities of the PP1c isoforms are very similar. However, genetic analysis provides a powerful approach to analyze the specific, nonredundant functions of each isoform. We previously showed that the Drosophila PP1β catalytic subunit gene PP1β9C corresponds to flapwing (flw), weak alleles of which are viable but flightless (Raghavan et al., 2000 blue right-pointing triangle). The semilethality of a strong allele, flw6, demonstrated that PP1β is essential in flies. flw6 larval body wall muscles appeared to form normally, but then detached and degenerated, leading to a semiparalyzed larva that could not feed properly (Raghavan et al., 2000 blue right-pointing triangle). In addition to muscle defects, the occasional male flw6 survivors were sterile and had blistered wings, indicating a nonredundant role for PP1β9C in nonmuscle cells as well as in muscles.

Here we show that the essential role of PP1β in flies is to regulate nonmuscle actomyosin. The lethality of strong flw (PP1β) mutants was suppressed by reducing the level of phospho-Sqh (MRLC), either using nonphosphorylatable point mutants of sqh or by reducing the gene dosage of key regulators such as Rho1 or RhoGEF2. flw mutants were also suppressed by reducing the gene dosage of nonmuscle myosin heavy chain (zipper). Clones of ovarian follicle cells mutant for flw6 had increased levels of phospho-Sqh, leading to disorganized or absent F-actin and to increased levels of myosin. Therefore, although PP1 isoforms collectively have many known roles, the essential, nonredundant role for PP1β in Drosophila is in the regulation of nonmuscle myosin activity and actin organization.

Drosophila has been reported to have only one MYPT homolog, named DMBS (Mizuno et al., 2002 blue right-pointing triangle; also known as DMYPT, Tan et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle). We demonstrate that DMBS binds both α and β isoforms of PP1 and is therefore unlikely to mediate a PP1β-specific function. However we have also identified a Drosophila PP1β-specific regulatory subunit, MYPT-75D, which is similar to mammalian MYPT3, a prenylated MYPT1/2 paralog (Skinner and Saltiel, 2001 blue right-pointing triangle). MYPT-75D binds specifically to PP1β in vitro and the two proteins coimmunoprecipitate from fly extracts. We show that MYPT-75D can stimulate PP1β's Sqh phosphatase activity in vitro and that MYPT-75D, PP1β and Sqh proteins coimmunoprecipitate. Expression of a nonPP1 binding form of MYPT-75D in flies results in elevation of phospho-Sqh and phenotypic consequences that can be suppressed by reducing the level of Sqh phosphorylation. We conclude that PP1β is targeted to Sqh by MYPT-75D, where it performs an essential role in the regulation of Sqh phosphorylation, and hence myosin activity, for which other PP1c isoforms cannot substitute. The conservation of all of these components, including the PP1α and β isoforms, suggests that regulation of nonmuscle myosin in mammals may also involve the activity of PP1β and an isoform-specific myosin targeting subunit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fly Stocks

w67c23, P{lacW}l(1)GO172 (flw7) was kindly provided by Ulrich Schaefer and Tm2J8 by Andrew Dingwall. PP1α87B mutants were provided by Myles Axton. UAS MYPT-75DWT and UAS MYPT-75DF117A were generated by P element–mediated germline transformation of a y w strain. Other Drosophila stocks were obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center.

Screens for Dominant Suppressors of flw6

For ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis, w1118 males isogenic for all three autosomes were starved for 9–11 h and then fed a 1% sucrose solution containing 25 mM EMS for 20–24 h. Mutagenized males were crossed to y cho sn flw6/FM6; cn bw; e; ci eyR virgin females. Surviving flw6 males from the F1 progeny (y cho sn flw6/Y; cn bw/+*; e/+*; ci eyR/+*, where an asterisk indicates a mutagenized chromosome), were individually backcrossed to females of the parental flw6 strain as were their FM6 brothers (FM6/Y; cn bw/+*; e/+*; ci eyR/+*), once it became apparent that surviving flw6 F1 males were invariably sterile. FM6 brothers of surviving F2flw6males were used to generate a line for further analysis. Segregation of the suppressor activity relative to autosomal markers allowed us to determine the chromosomal linkage of the new mutations.

Our initial screens used y cho sn flw6 (Raghavan et al., 2000 blue right-pointing triangle). However, when we realized that flw6 interacted with actomyosin genes, we removed singed (sn), which encodes an actin-bundling protein (Cant et al., 1994 blue right-pointing triangle). Removing sn made no obvious difference to the flw phenotype, but in all later experiments we used w1118 flw6 or w67c23 flw7.

Mapping Analysis

Modifiers were recombination mapped by mating Su(flw)/Balancer males to females carrying a multiply marked second (aldp b pr cn c px sp/CyO) or third (ru h th st cu sr e ca/TM3, Sb) chromosome. In the case of a suppressor on the second chromosome, F1 Su(flw)/al dp b pr cn c px sp females were crossed to al dp b pr Bl cn c px sp/CyO males; equivalent crosses were used for the third chromosome, using ru h th st cu sr Pr e ca/TM6B. F2 recombinant males were individually crossed to y cho sn flw6/FM7c females to score suppression of flw6.

Isolation of MYPT-75D

The two-hybrid screen of 5 × 106 Drosophila 3rd instar larval cDNAs, using PP1β9C as bait, was described in Bennett and Alphey (2002 blue right-pointing triangle) and Bennett et al. (1999 blue right-pointing triangle). Database searches and sequencing revealed that BDGP clone LD46604 (Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project/HHMI EST Project, unpublished results) contained the entire MYPT-75D coding region.

MYPT-75D Expression Constructs

The start codon of MYPT-75D was modified to an NdeI site and the complete open reading frame inserted as an NdeI-NotI fragment into pET28a for expression as NH2-terminal His6-tagged protein in Escherichia coli and into pUAS-HM (Parker et al., 2001 blue right-pointing triangle) for expression as His6Myc2-tagged protein in Drosophila. Substitution of Phe 117 to Ala in MYPT-75DF117A was by PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis.

Phosphatase Assays

Phosphatase assays of fly extracts were as in Bennett et al. (2003 blue right-pointing triangle), from three independent extracts per genotype. Recombinant His6-Sqh was purified from E. coli as in Skinner and Saltiel (2001 blue right-pointing triangle) and phosphorylated with MLCK as in Ichikawa et al. (1996 blue right-pointing triangle). Phosphorylated Sqh was incubated with 0.5 μg of bacterially expressed PP1β9C or PP1α87B, prepared as in Bennett et al. (1999 blue right-pointing triangle). Samples were analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-Sqh antibody and antiphospho-Sqh antibody. Assays using 32P-labeled Sqh and recombinant purified His6-MYPT-75D proteins were performed as Skinner and Saltiel (2001 blue right-pointing triangle).

Anti-phospho-Sqh Antibody

The rabbit antiphospho-Sqh antibody was raised by Moravian-Biotechnology (Brno, Czech Republic) against a phosphopeptide (KKRAQRAT[phospho-S]NVFAM) corresponding to a fragment of Sqh phosphorylated at S21.

Immunoprecipitation from Adult Drosophila Extracts

Fly extracts from [UAS-HM-MYPT-75D, Sqh-FLAG, arm-GAL4 and UAS-HA-PP1 (PP1α87B or PP1β9C)] flies, which express FLAG-tagged Sqh, Myc-tagged MYPT-75D and either HA-tagged PP1α87B or HA-tagged PP1β9C, [arm-GAL4, UAS HA-PP1 (PP1α87B or PP1β9C)] flies, which express either HA-tagged PP1α87B or HA-tagged PP1β9C and [UAS-HM-MYPT-75D (wild-type or F117A); arm-GAL4, UAS-HA-PP1 (PP1α87B or PP1β9C)] flies, which express either Myc-tagged MYPT-75D wild-type or F117A and either HA-tagged PP1α87B or HA-tagged PP1β9C, were prepared as in Rudenko et al. (2003 blue right-pointing triangle) and subjected to immunoprecipitation using anti-FLAG antibodies (M2, Sigma, St. Louis, MO), anti-DMBS antibodies (Mizuno et al., 2002 blue right-pointing triangle), or anti-Myc antibodies (A14, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). After absorption on protein G bound to GammaBind Plus Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences, Amersham, United Kingdom), we analyzed immunoprecipitates and total cell extracts by immunoblotting with antibodies against FLAG, Myc and/or HA (12CA5, Roche Diagnostics, Lewes, East Sussex, United Kngdom).

Immunostaining

Mosaic analysis of w flw6 clones: w1118 flw6 FRT18A/FM7c females were crossed to w1118 Ubi-GFP FRT18A;; MKRS, hs-FLP86E/+ males. Progeny from this cross were allowed to develop to second and third instar larvae, heat shocked at 37.5°C for 1.5h in a water bath, and then allowed to grow up to adulthood. Dissected ovaries from 3–5-d-old w1118 flw6 FRT18A/w1118 Ubi-GFP FRT18A;; MKRS, hs-FLP86 females were fixed for 30 min in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. F-actin was stained with 2.5 μg/ml TRITC phalloidin (Sigma) in PBS, 0.3% Tween-20. Rabbit antimyosin heavy chain (Zipper) antibody, provided by Christine Field (Foe et al., 2000 blue right-pointing triangle), and antiphospho-Sqh were used at 1:600 and 1:400 in PBS, 0.3% Tween-20, respectively. Monoclonal mouse antiactin clone C4 (ICN Biomedicals, Costa Mesa, CA) was used at 1:5000. Secondary antibodies were Cy5-αRb, Cy5-αmouse, and Cy3-αRb (Jackson Labs, 1:1000). Homozygous w1118 flw6 follicle clones were visualized by the absence of Ubi-GFP.

Wing discs from MS1096-GAL4/+; UAS-MYPT-75D (wild-type or F117A)/+ larvae and ovaries from 3–5-d-old hs-FLP/+; UAS-MYPT-75D (wild-type or F117A)/AyGAL4, UAS GFP adult flies that had been heat-shocked as second and third instar larvae, were stained with mouse monoclonal antimyc antibody (9E10, Roche) at 1:5 and antiphospho-Sqh at 1:400.

Images were collected on a Bio-Rad Radiance Plus (Richmond, CA) scanning confocal microscope and processed with Adobe Photoshop 5.0 (San Jose, CA).

RESULTS

Isolation of Suppressors of flw

To analyze the essential, nonredundant function(s) of PP1β9C, we conducted an F2 EMS genetic screen for dominant extragenic suppressors of flw6, the design of which allowed us to screen all three autosomes (~80% of the genome), but not the X chromosome. We recovered four suppressors from screening ~1000 sets of mutant autosomes. Because of the way these suppressors were isolated, they must be due to independent mutagenic events. Each of these Su(flw) mutations dominantly suppressed the lethality, sterility, and wing defects of flw6, with variable penetrance (Table 1A and Figure 1).

Figure 1.
Dominant suppression of flw by EMS-induced mutants. (A–H) Suppressors of flw [Su(flw)] can dominantly suppress flw wing phenotypes. (A) Wild-type (Oregon R) male. Rare flw 6/Y and flw 7/Y male survivors have severely crumpled wings (B and F). ...
Table 1.
Suppression of flw6 by single-gene mutations.

Suppressors Are Not Specific for flw6 and Do Not Increase Total PP1 Activity

flw6 is due to a point mutation in the PP1β coding region (Raghavan et al., 2000 blue right-pointing triangle). Suppressors could perhaps be chaperones or binding proteins that stabilize or compensate for the changed structure of the protein. To test these possibilities we isolated a new flw allele, with a different molecular basis. flw7 has a P[lacW] element inserted in the 5′ untranslated region of PP1β9C, leading to a reduced level of expression of PP1β (Gross, 2001 blue right-pointing triangle). flw7 mutant males show all the characteristic phenotypes of flw6, though slightly more (~2%) of the mutant males survive. The semilethality and visible phenotypes of flw6 and flw7 can be rescued by ectopic expression of a PP1β9C cDNA (Table 1B and Figure 1). All four EMS-induced suppressors could also suppress flw7, indicating that they are not specifically compensating for the single amino acid change in flw6 (Table 1). The suppressors could potentially suppress flw6 and flw7 through a restoration of overall phosphatase activity, for example, by increased transcription of flw or by some posttranscriptional mechanism. We therefore measured the total PP1 activity of select mutant combinations. None of the suppressors led to a measurable increase in PP1 activity (Figure 1I).

PP1β9C Has a Single Essential Function

Having eliminated these mechanisms for global suppression of flw mutants, we concluded that the suppressors are components or targets of a pathway that requires flw. Because single gene mutations could suppress the lethality of flw mutants, regulation of this pathway must be the essential, nonredundant role of flw. The suppressors might represent an antagonistic kinase, a substrate, or other component of the pathway. These components might themselves be common to a small number of pathways, but still define a single nonredundant role for flw, e.g., a single key substrate.

Su(flw) Are Loss of Function Alleles of Nonmuscle Myosin Heavy Chain and Tropomyosin 1

We mapped the four Su(flw) using meiotic recombination. Su(flw)1, 2, and 3 mapped to the tip of 2R, distal to speck at 2-107.0 (60B13–60F). Su(flw)4 mapped to the third chromosome, between curled and stripe (3-55.1 ± 2.2 or 86D3-4; 90D6-E2). Complementation tests revealed that Su(flw)1, 2, and 3 are recessive lethal alleles of a single essential gene. All three also failed to complement existing alleles of zipper (zip), which encodes nonmuscle myosin heavy chain (Young et al., 1993 blue right-pointing triangle), identifying the second chromosome Su(flw) as zipper. To test whether suppression is due to some allele-specific peculiarities, we tested a further two zip mutant alleles and a zip deficiency for their ability to suppress flw6 and flw7. All three suppressed the lethality and sterility of flw/Y (Table 1B), indicating that suppression is not allele specific and is most likely due to a simple reduction in the amount of myosin heavy chain.

Having shown that several zip alleles could suppress at least two alleles of flw, we investigated whether zip mutants could suppress alleles of PP1α87B.zip did not suppress PP1α87B1/PP1α87B 87Bg-3, a semilethal allelic combination, indicating that zip specifically suppresses PP1β (unpublished data). This does not preclude a role for PP1α87B in myosin regulation, but implies that this is not the only essential role of PP1α87B, consistent with the mutant phenotype of PP1α87B (Axton et al., 1990 blue right-pointing triangle).

Previous genetic analysis identified several zip interacting loci (Halsell and Kiehart, 1998 blue right-pointing triangle), one of which, Tropomyosin 1 (Tm1), maps to the same region as Su(flw)4. Su(flw)4 failed to complement Tm102299, identifying this suppressor as an allele of Tm1. Tm102299 suppressed both flw6 and flw7, again indicating that this genetic interaction is not allele-specific (Table 1B and unpublished data). Drosophila has two tropomyosin genes, the other being the muscle-specific Tm2 (Kreuz et al., 1996 blue right-pointing triangle). We therefore tested whether Tm2J8 could also suppress flw6, but found no such suppression (Table 1B), indicating that the essential role of PP1β specifically relates to regulation of nonmuscle myosin. We also tested the known upstream regulators of MRLC activity, Rho1 and RhoGEF2, for interaction with flw. Mutations in both genes strongly suppressed flw6 (Table 1B).

Phosphorylation Mutants of Sqh

In view of the known role of PP1 as a MRLC phosphatase in mammals, we speculated that mutants of the phosphorylation site(s) in Sqh might interact genetically with flw. We obtained a set of such phosphorylation site mutants in which the critical residues Thr-20 and Ser-21 (equivalent to Thr-18 and Ser-19 in vertebrate MRLC) had been changed to Ala (sqhA20A21), to prevent phosphorylation, or to Glu (sqhE20E21), to mimic constitutive phosphorylation (Jordan and Karess, 1997 blue right-pointing triangle; Winter et al., 2001 blue right-pointing triangle). Phosphorylation of these sites leads to myosin activation; dephosphorylation reduces myosin motor activity. These sqh mutant transgenes are under the control of the sqh promoter and are expressed at levels similar to the native protein. All these experiments were carried out in a background containing the wild-type sqh gene. The nonphosphorylatable sqhA20A21 strongly suppressed both flw6 and flw7 mutant phenotypes (Table 1). In contrast, increasing the level of “phospho”-Sqh with the phosphorylation mimic sqhE20E21 enhanced the weak flw mutant, flw1 to lethality. By using single mutants in either Thr-20 or Ser-21, we found that Ser-21 had the greater effect (Table 1). The phosphorylation state of Sqh is therefore closely related to the viability of flw mutants and hence to the essential role of PP1β.

Phospho-Sqh Levels Are Elevated in flw6 Mutant Clones

To examine further the role of PP1β in actomyosin regulation, we investigated the effect of loss of PP1β9C on myosin distribution and phosphorylation, and on actin organization. Clones of ovarian follicle cells homozygous for flw6 were stained for actin, phosphorylated Sqh and myosin heavy chain (Zip, Figure 2). The level of phospho-Sqh was dramatically increased in the majority of these clones (Figure 2G), as was the level of Zip (Figure 2K). A nonphosphospecific anti-Sqh antibody showed no increase in staining in the clones (unpublished data). In most clones with elevated phospho-Sqh or Zip, the amount of filamentous actin (F-actin) was decreased, and the apical F-actin network was clearly disorganized (e.g., Figure 2B). Disruption of F-actin, visualized with TRITC-phalloidin, correlated with accumulation of cytoplasmic actin, visualized by immunofluorescence with antiactin antibody (Figure 2, A–D). Because this antibody does not appear to stain F-actin efficiently under our fixation conditions (note the absence of overlap between the actin antibody signal and the phalloidin staining in Figure 2D), we propose that there is an increase in the cytoplasmic pool of G-actin in the mutant cells. These data clearly show that the correct structure of the actin cytoskeleton, and Sqh dephosphorylation, are both dependent on PP1β9C.

Figure 2.
Loss of PP1β leads to hyper-phosphorylation of Sqh and disruption of the actin cytoskeleton. (A–L) Egg chambers including clones of follicle cells homozygous for flw 6 stained with TRITC-phalloidin (column 2, red in merge), and antibodies ...

The phenotypes described above were not fully penetrant. On careful examination we noticed that some clones had increased levels of phospho-Sqh and myosin but normallooking F-actin. This suggests that the F-actin disruption is a secondary consequence of increased phospho-Sqh. The increase in phospho-Sqh and Zip in these clones appeared to be concentrated toward the basal region of the cell (see Supplementary Information).

In addition to somatic clones, we analyzed germline clones mutant for flw6, and also generated mutant egg chambers by somatic rescue of the flw6 phenotype with arm-GAL4, UAS-PP1β9C, which expresses PP1β9C in somatic cells but not in the female germline (Rorth, 1998 blue right-pointing triangle). Like follicle cells, mutant egg chambers had elevated levels of phospho-Sqh and Zip and defects in their actin cytoskeleton organization. In particular, they had aggregates of myosin, resembling those seen in Sqh mutants (Jordan and Karess, 1997 blue right-pointing triangle). Later, mutant egg chambers showed a clear “dumping” defect, a failure of the normally rapid transfer of the contents of the nurse cells into the oocyte at stages 10B and 11 (Figure 3, E–G). This process depends on actomyosin (Jordan and Karess, 1997 blue right-pointing triangle; Hudson and Cooley, 2002 blue right-pointing triangle), and so may be a consequence of the defective actin and myosin organization, but we also observed that the ring canals, which join the nurse cells to each other and to the oocyte, were defective in flw6 mutant egg chambers. The ring canals appear normal initially, but then fail to grow properly, leading to ring canals that are much smaller than wild-type by stage 10 (Figure 3H). Small ring canals may not permit fast cytoplasmic transport from nurse cell to cytoplasm. These germline phenotypes—dumping failure, disorganized actin and myosin, and small ring canals—are all dependent on the germline genotype: they are present in mutant germline clones with wild-type follicle cells, but not in egg chambers which have wild-type germ line but predominantly mutant follicle cells.

Figure 3.
Loss of PP1β in egg chambers leads to abnormal ring canals and dumping defects. Cytoplasmic dumping and ring canal growth are defective in flw 6 homozygous egg chambers. Egg chambers were stained with propidium iodide to visualize DNA (A and E, ...

MYPT-75D Is a PP1β-specific Binding Protein

We have shown that loss of PP1β9C in clones leads to hyperphosphorylation of Sqh in vivo, and the lethality of strong mutants of flw can be suppressed by a nonphosphorylatable mutant version of Sqh. This demonstrates that flw regulates the phosphorylation of Sqh and that this is the essential role of PP1β. We also analyzed phospho-Sqh level by immunoblotting. We detected phospho-Sqh in extracts from rare hemizygous flw6 survivors, whereas we found no detectable phospho-Sqh in extracts from wild-type flies or flies hemizygous for flw1 (Figure 4A), presumably reflecting a low wild-type abundance relative to the sensitivity of our antibody, consistent with our immunofluorescence data. Phosphatase assays revealed that both PP1β9C and PP1α87B efficiently dephosphorylate phospho-Sqh in vitro as immunoreactivity to our phospho-Sqh–specific antibody decreased over time on incubation with purified PP1β or PP1α (Figure 4A). However, as purified PP1 catalytic subunits have broad substrate specificity in vitro, this was not surprising. The greater substrate specificity of PP1c in vivo is due to association of the catalytic subunit with regulatory subunits (Bollen, 2001 blue right-pointing triangle; Cohen, 2002 blue right-pointing triangle). Although PP1c need interact only transiently with its substrates to dephosphorylate them, it is nonetheless sometimes found in stable complexes with specific substrates, mediated by the relevant regulatory subunit.

Figure 4.
MYPT-75D specifically binds PP1β and stimulates its activity toward Sqh in vitro. (A) Top, levels of phosphorylated-Sqh are elevated in flw 6 mutant larvae. Equal amounts of total protein extracted from wild-type, flw 1, and flw 6 males was subjected ...

Drosophila has two genes that might encode regulatory subunits capable of targeting PP1c to Sqh. These are DMBS, homologous to mammalian MYPT1/2 (Mizuno et al., 2002 blue right-pointing triangle; Tan et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle) and MYPT-75D, homologous to mammalian MYPT3 (Figure 5). We isolated MYPT-75D in a two-hybrid screen for proteins capable of binding PP1β9C (Bennett et al., 1999 blue right-pointing triangle; Bennett and Alphey, 2002 blue right-pointing triangle). Of 36 genes identified in this screen, including homologues of known PP1 regulatory subunits such as Inhibitor-2 and NIPP1 (Bennett et al., 1999 blue right-pointing triangle; Parker et al., 2002 blue right-pointing triangle), only MYPT-75D discriminated between the PP1 isoforms. Unfortunately, sequence comparison of the different MYPT proteins has not revealed any sequences that might be responsible for the observed binding specificity of MYPT-75D. MYPT-75D contains a canonical PP1c-binding motif (R/K,[x], V/I, x, F, here RHISF, residues 113–117) followed by five ankyrin repeats (residues 119–148, 151–180, 182–216, 280–310, 312–346, Figure 5) and a potential CaaX prenylation motif (CCVLM, residues 737–741). Unlike DMBS, MYPT-75D does not contain a regulatory Rho-kinase phosphorylation site.

Figure 5.
MYPT-75D is a second myosin targeting subunit molecule in Drosophila that is most closely related to mammalian MYPT3. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of the predicted sequence of the NH2-terminal ankyrin-repeat region of MYPT proteins: hMYPT1, human MYPT1 ...

In extracts from flies moderately overexpressing myc-MYPT-75D along with HA epitope-tagged PP1β9C or PP1α87B and FLAG-tagged Sqh (using arm-GAL4), PP1β9C coimmunoprecipitated with Sqh, but PP1α87B did not (Figure 4B), suggesting that PP1c is in a stable complex with MYPT-75D and Sqh in vivo. We further examined the PP1 binding specificities of MYPT-75D and DMBS by coimmunoprecipitation from flies. We found that DMBS bound both PP1β9C and PP1α87B, whereas MYPT-75D bound only PP1β9C (Figure 4C). Therefore Drosophila contains at least three distinct PP1-MYPT complexes: PP1α +DMBS, PP1β +DMBS and PP1β +MYPT-75D. To test directly the role of the “RVXF” site in MYPT-75D for binding to PP1c, we disrupted the motif by changing the critical Phe residue to Ala. This mutant, MYPT-75DF117A, failed to bind to PP1β9C (Figure 4C).

flw Interacts Differentially with Two Myosin-targeting Subunits

We examined whether DMBS or MYPT-75D interact genetically with flw mutants (Table 1). We found that reduction in the gene dosage of DMBS (DMBSE1/+) did not enhance flw1, but that overexpression of a DMBS cDNA did suppress flw6. Unfortunately, no mutants for MYPT-75D are available. High-level expression of the MYPT-75D cDNA (hsp70-GAL4, UAS-MYPT-75D with heat shock) is lethal to flw1 mutants but also to wild-type (unpublished data). Moderate overexpression of a MYPT-75D cDNA (arm-GAL4, UAS-MYPT-75D or hsp70-GAL4, UAS-MYPT-75D without heat shock) did not suppress flw6 and indeed somewhat enhanced flw1.

MYPT-75D:PP1β Regulates Phosphorylation of Sqh In Vitro and In Vivo

We measured the effect of MYPT-75D on PP1c activity in vitro using 32P-Sqh as substrate. Recombinant MYPT-75D stimulated the Sqh phosphatase activity of PP1β9C, but inhibited that of PP1α87B (Figure 4D). Disruption of the PP1c-binding motif abolished the ability of MYPT-75D to activate PP1β9C, showing that binding to MYPT-75D is necessary for the stimulation of PP1β9C's Sqh phosphatase activity.

We then used this nonbinding mutant to test the in vivo role of MYPT-75D-PP1β. Ectopic expression of wild-type MYPT-75D (MYPT-75DWT) in the wing had no phenotypic effect, but expression of MYPT-75DF117A resulted in crumpled, blistered wings (Figure 6, A and B). The wing phenotypes induced by expression of MYPT-75DF117A were suppressed by zip1, Tm102299, and sqhA20, A21 and enhanced by sqhE20, E21 (Figure 6, C and D), indicating that the effect of loss of binding of PP1β to MYPT-75D corresponds to changes in nonmuscle myosin activity.

Figure 6.
An MYPT-75D:PP1β9C regulates Sqh phosphorylation in vivo. (A–D). Effect of expression of wild-type MYPT- 75D and MYPT-75D F117A in wild-type and mutant backgrounds. (A) Wings from flies ectopically expressing wild-type MYPT-75D using the ...

When we examined levels of phospho-Sqh in wing discs from larvae of these genotypes, we saw elevated phospho-Sqh staining in cells expressing MYPT-75DF117A but not those expressing MYPT-75DWT (compare Figure 6, F and I). The myc-tagged MYPT-75D localized to the cell periphery. We also examined the effect of MYPT-75D overexpression on phospho-Sqh in follicle cell clones in the ovary. Just as we observed in wing discs, phospho-Sqh was elevated in clones expressing MYPT-75DF117A but not MYPT-75DWT (Figure 6, M and Q). Therefore, MYPT-75D-bound PP1β can stimulate dephosphorylation of nonmuscle MRLC both in vitro and in vivo.

DISCUSSION

We have previously shown that PP1β mutants are semilethal, therefore PP1β is an essential gene in Drosophila (Raghavan et al., 2000 blue right-pointing triangle). Here we have shown that two semilethal mutant alleles of PP1β can be dominantly suppressed by loss-of-function extragenic mutations. The existence of single-gene extragenic suppressors indicates that PP1β has a single essential role, the identity of the suppressors indicates that this role is in the regulation of actin and/or myosin. Though the main defect observed in flw mutants is muscle detachment and degeneration, it is clear from our data that it is nonmuscle myosin, rather than muscle myosin, that is affected. Zipper and Sqh are components of nonmuscle myosin; the muscle version of Sqh, Mlc2, does not interact with flw (Raghavan et al., 2000 blue right-pointing triangle). Similarly, Tm1, but not the muscle-specific Tm2, suppresses flw. Disruption of nonmuscle myosin in flw mutants may lead to disruption of the actin cytoskeleton and affect cell adhesion in many cell types, but seems to be most readily apparent in contractile muscle, particularly the highly specialized indirect flight muscles (Raghavan et al., 2000 blue right-pointing triangle). Though not directly involved in generation of contractile force, nonmuscle myosin seems to be necessary for the correct development of striated myofibrils (Bloor and Kiehart, 2001 blue right-pointing triangle).

The dominant suppression of the lethality of flw6 and flw7 mutants by SqhA20A21, coupled with the enhancement of flw1 by SqhE20E21, implies that the essential role of PP1β 9C is related to the regulation of the phosphorylation state of Sqh. To address whether this interaction is direct or indirect we have shown that PP1β can directly dephosphorylate phospho-Sqh in vitro and that the two proteins coimmunoprecipitate from Drosophila extracts. Furthermore we have identified a new PP1β-specific MYPT, and shown that binding of MYPT-75D to PP1β stimulates dephosphorylation of nonmuscle MRLC both in vitro and in vivo. We therefore conclude that the major or only essential role of PP1β in Drosophila is to dephosphorylate Sqh and that this role is mediated, at least in part, by association with a β-specific MYPT protein. Although flw6 behaves as a null allele by genetic tests (Raghavan et al., 2000 blue right-pointing triangle), we cannot rule out the possibility that it has some residual activity and that this is sufficient to perform one or more additional essential functions of PP1β, which for some reason require only a very low level of PP1β activity. PP1β, MRLC and MYPT proteins are highly conserved between flies and mammals, so it seems likely that dephosphorylation of MRLC is also an essential role of PP1β in humans.

Though PP1β can dephosphorylate Sqh directly and manipulating the phosphorylation state of Sqh is sufficient to suppress strong mutants of flw, we cannot exclude the possibility that flw has other substrates in the same pathway. For example, nonmuscle myosin heavy chain, which in mammals can be phosphorylated by PKC and CKII (Murakami et al., 1998 blue right-pointing triangle; Bresnick, 1999 blue right-pointing triangle), could also be a substrate for PP1β.

What is the molecular basis of the suppression of flw? We believe that the key defect, both in flw mutants and in flies expressing MYPT-75DF117A, is the hyperphosphorylation of Sqh, particularly on Ser-21; this is directly suppressed by the nonphosphorylatable Sqh mutants. In these experiments a pool of normal Sqh remains, so we are essentially manipulating the ratio of phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated Sqh. Phosphorylation of Sqh leads to activation of the myosin motor; reduction in the amount of myosin heavy chain in zipper+/- presumably reduces the amount of active motor. Sqh is known to be a substrate for Rho-kinase, itself activated by a pathway that includes two more suppressors: Rho1 and RhoGEF2. Rho-kinase itself is located on the X chromosome and was therefore not accessible to our genetic screen.

Tm1, a strong suppressor of flw6, is not a member of Rho-kinase pathway but a cytoskeletal actin-binding protein (Tetzlaff et al., 1996 blue right-pointing triangle). Several functions have been ascribed to nonmuscle tropomyosin in mammals: modulation of myosin function (Strand et al., 2001 blue right-pointing triangle), actin polymerization (Wen et al., 2000 blue right-pointing triangle), regulating microfilament branching (Blanchoin et al., 2001 blue right-pointing triangle), and suppression of neoplastic transformation (Mahadev et al., 2002 blue right-pointing triangle). Reduction in the amount of Tm1 appears to mitigate the consequences of hyper-phosphorylated Sqh; the obvious mechanism is by reducing the binding of active myosin to actin, though Tm1 could have its effect through regulation of actin structure and polymerization.

The phenotypes we have described for flw somewhat resemble those of DMBS, particularly in the female germ line (Tan et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle) and in that they both lead to the accumulation of phospho-Sqh (Mizuno et al., 2002 blue right-pointing triangle), though DMBS mutants do not show the accumulation of myosin aggregates (Tan et al., 2003 blue right-pointing triangle). The differences in lethal phase (embryonic for DMBS, predominantly larval for flw) might be accounted for by maternal contribution and differences in protein stability; we were unable to investigate this further as both DMBS and flw are required for oogenesis. Furthermore, the flw suppressors sqhA20A21, Rho1 and zipper have been shown or deduced to modify at least some of the DMBS phenotypes. This might indicate that the critical role of flw is mediated by DMBS. However, we have shown that DMBS is not specific for PP1β. PP1α87B is much more abundant than PP1β, so flw mutants should have little effect on the DMBS: PP1c complex. It is possible that DMBS:PP1β has a unique role not shared by DMBS:PP1α; it is also possible that DMBS, which is phosphorylated by Rho-kinase, is itself directly or indirectly activated by a PP1β-specific phosphatase complex. However, because we have identified an additional, PP1β-specific MYPT, it seems much more likely that this is the key targeting subunit that mediates the essential role of PP1β in vivo and that the suppression of flw by Rho and RhoGEF is through a decrease in phosphorylation of nonmuscle MRLC by Rho-kinase.

Why do flies have two MYPTs apparently doing the same job, one PP1β-specific and the other not? Clearly DMBS is not completely redundant with MYPT-75D, as DMBS mutants are lethal; mutants for MYPT-75D are not available to test the converse. One possible explanation for the presence of multiple myosin targeting subunits in mammals, flies and nematodes lies at the C-termini: MYPT-75D/MYPT3 have a CaaX prenylation motif, whereas DMBS/MYPT1/2 do not. MYPT-75D localizes to the cell periphery; this implies the existence of two different nonmuscle myosin phosphatases in different compartments of the cell: DMBS:PP1c (PP1α or PP1β) in the cytoplasm and MYPT-75D:PP1β at the plasma membrane. These myosin phosphatases have different roles and may be subject to different regulation. However, gross perturbation, such as complete removal of one complex in either DMBS or flw mutants, may lead to hyperphosphorylation of Sqh throughout the cell and hence to similar phenotypic consequences. Similarly, overexpression of the cytoplasmic form at a sufficiently high level may compensate for loss of the membrane-associated form: we found that overexpression of a DMBS cDNA can suppress flw6, indicating that greatly increased levels of DMBS:PP1α87B can partially compensate for loss of functional MYPT-75D: PP1β9C complexes. A reduction in DMBS gene dose did not enhance flw1, indicating that DMBS is not itself the key targeting subunit for PP1β. Overexpression of MYPT-75D did not suppress flw6, presumably because MYPT-75D is not limiting or because increased levels of a defective MYPT-75D:PP1β9C complex are not helpful. High-level overexpression of MYPT-75D was lethal to wild-type flies, and modest overexpression somewhat reduced the viability of flw1 flies. We interpret both of these as being due to excess MYPT-75D diverting some PP1β from its normal role or location. flw1 flies, in which the MYPT-75D:PP1β9C myosin phosphatase is already somewhat defective, would be predicted to be more sensitive to this effect, as we observed.

In conclusion, we have shown that PP1β has an essential role, which is in the regulation of nonmuscle myosin, and this can be entirely explained by its role as an MRLC phosphatase. It associates with two different myosin-targeting subunits, one of which is specific for PP1β. These two myosin phosphatases have different roles, though sufficiently high-level expression of the putative cytoplasmic form can partially compensate for loss of the putative membrane-associated form. Loss of PP1β, and hence the PP1β-specific myosin phosphatase, leads to cytoskeletal defects and death, as does loss of the other myosin phosphatase, indicating that each has an important, nonredundant role. All of the components of the system we have analyzed are well conserved between flies and humans, suggesting that the PP1β-specific myosin phosphatase may also be conserved.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental Figure]

Acknowledgments

We thank Roger Karess, Yasuyoshi Nishida, Ulrich Schaefer, Myles Axton, Andrew Dingwall, and the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center for flies; Roger Karess, Christine Field, and Yasuyoshi Nishida for antibodies; David Hartshorne for calmodulin and MLCK. We thank other members of the MRC Drosophila Cooperative Group for their help and advice, particularly to Karen Clifton, Attila Tasnadi, and Graham Knight for technical assistance. This work was supported by grants to L.A. from the Medical Research Council and BBSRC. D.B. is a Todd-Bird Research Fellow at New College, Oxford.

Notes

Article published online ahead of print. Mol. Biol. Cell 10.1091/mbc.E04–02–0139. Article and publication date are available at www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E04–02–0139.

D in BoxThe online version of this article contains supplemental material accessible through http://www.molbiolcell.org.

References

  • Axton, J.M., Dombradi, V., Cohen, P.T., and Glover, D.M. (1990). One of the protein phosphatase 1 isoenzymes in Drosophila is essential for mitosis. Cell 63, 33-46. [PubMed]
  • Baksa, K. et al.. (1993). Mutations in the protein phosphatase 1 gene at 87B can differentially affect suppression of position-effect variegation and mitosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 135, 117-125. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bennett, D., and Alphey, L. (2002). PP1 binds dSARA to antagonise Dpp signalling. Nat. Genet. 31, 419-423. [PubMed]
  • Bennett, D., Szoor, B., and Alphey, L. (1999). The chaperone-like properties of mammalian inhibitor-2.are conserved in a Drosophila homologue. Biochemistry 38, 16276-16282. [PubMed]
  • Bennett, D., Szoor, B., Gross, S., Vereshchagina, N., and Alphey, L. (2003). Ectopic expression of inhibitors of protein phosphatase type 1 (PP1) can be used to analyze roles of PP1 in Drosophila development. Genetics 164, 235-245. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Blanchoin, L., Pollard, T.D., and Hitchcock-DeGregori, S.E. (2001). Inhibition of the Arp2/3 complex-nucleated actin polymerisation and branch formation by tropomyosin. Curr. Biol. 11, 1300-1304. [PubMed]
  • Bloor, J., and Kiehart, D. (2001). zipper nonmuscle myosin-II functions downstream of PS2 integrin in Drosophila myogenesis and is necessary for myofibril formation. Dev. Biol. 239, 215-228. [PubMed]
  • Bollen, M. (2001). Combinatorial control of protein phosphatase-1.Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 426-431. [PubMed]
  • Bresnick, A. (1999). Molecular mechanisms of nonmuscle myosin-II regulation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 26-33. [PubMed]
  • Cant, K., Knowles, B., Mooseker, M., and Cooley, L. (1994). Drosophila singed, a fascin homolog, is required for actin bundle formation during oogenesis and bristle extension. J. Cell Biol. 125, 369-380. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cohen, P. (2002). Protein phosphatase 1—targeted in many directions. J. Cell Sci. 115, 241-256. [PubMed]
  • Dombrádi, V., Axton, J.M., Barker, H.M., and Cohen, P.T. (1990a). Protein phosphatase 1 activity in Drosophila mutants with abnormalities in mitosis and chromosome condensation. FEBS Lett. 275, 39-43. [PubMed]
  • Dombrádi, V., Axton, J.M., Brewis, N.D., da Cruz e Silva, E.F., Alphey, L., and Cohen, P.T.W. (1990b). Drosophila contains three genes that encode distinct isoforms of protein phosphatase 1. Eur. J. Biochem. 194, 739-745. [PubMed]
  • Dombrádi, V., Mann, D.J., Saunders, R.D.C., and Cohen, P.T.W. (1993). Cloning of the fourth functional gene for protein phosphatase 1 in Drosophila melanogaster from its chromosomal location. Eur. J. Biochem. 212, 177-183. [PubMed]
  • Edwards, K., and Kiehart, D. (1996). Drosophila nonmuscle myosin II has multiple essential roles in imaginal disc and egg chamber morphogenesis. Development 122, 1499-1511. [PubMed]
  • Foe, V.E., Field, C.M., and Odell, G.M. (2000). Microtubules and mitotic cycle phase modulate spatiotemporal distributions of F-actin and myosin II in Drosophila syncytial blastoderm embryos. Development 127, 1767-1787. [PubMed]
  • Gross, S. (2001). Genetic and biochemical analysis of Protein Phosphatase type 1 in Drosophila melanogaster, DPhil, University of Oxford, Oxford.
  • Halsell, S., and Kiehart, D. (1998). Second-site noncomplementation identifies genomic regions required for Drosophila nonmuscle myosin function during morphogenesis. Genetics 148, 1845-1863. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hartshorne, D. (1998). Myosin phosphatase: subunits and interactions. Acta Physiol. Scand. 164, 483-493. [PubMed]
  • Holst, J., Sim, A., and Ludowyke, R. (2002). Protein phosphatases 1 and 2A transiently associate with myosin during the peak rate of secretion from mast cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 1083-1098. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hudson, A., and Cooley, L. (2002). Understanding the function of actin-binding proteins through genetic analysis of Drosophila oogenesis. Annu. Rev. Genet 36, 455-488. [PubMed]
  • Ichikawa, K., Hirano, K., Ito, M., Tanaka, J., Nakano, T., and Hartshorne, D.J. (1996). Interactions and properties of smooth muscle myosin phosphatase. Biochemistry 35, 6313-6320. [PubMed]
  • Jordan, P., and Karess, R. (1997). Myosin light chain-activating phosphorylation sites are required for oogenesis in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 139, 1805-1819. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kaibuchi, K., Kuroda, S., and Amano, M. (1999). Regulation of the cytoskeleton and cell adhesion by the Rho family GTPases in mammalian cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 459-486. [PubMed]
  • Karess, R.E., Chang, X.J., Edwards, K.A., Kulkarni, S.J., Aguilera, I., and Kiehart, D.P. (1991). The regulatory light chain of nonmuscle myosin is encoded by spaghetti-squash, a gene required for cytokinesis in Drosophila. Cell 65, 1177-1189. [PubMed]
  • Kiss, E., Muranyi, A., Csortos, C., Gergely, P., Ito, M., Hartshorne, D., and Erdodi, F. (2002). Integrin-linked kinase phosphorylates the myosin phosphatase target subunit at the inhibitory site in platelet cytoskeleton. Biochem. J. 365, 79-87. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kreuz, A.J., Simcox, A., and Maughan, D. (1996). Alterations in flight muscle ultrastructure and function in Drosophila tropomyosin mutants. J. Cell Biol. 135, 673-687. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • MacDonald, J., Borman, M., Muranyi, A., Somlyo, A., Hartshorne, D., and Haystead, T. (2001). Identification of the endogenous smooth muscle myosin phosphatase-associated kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mahadev, K., Raval, G., Shantaram, B., Willingham, M.C., Lange, E.M., Vonderhaar, B., Salomon, D., and Prasad, G.L. (2002). Suppression of the transformed phenotype of breast cancer by Tropomyosin-1.Exp. Cell Res. 279, 40-51. [PubMed]
  • Matsumura, F., Totsukawa, G., Yamakita, Y., and Yamashiro, S. (2001). Role of myosin light chain phosphorylation in the regulation of cytokinesis. Cell Struct. Funct. 26, 639-644. [PubMed]
  • Mizuno, T., Tsutsui, K., and Nishida, Y. (2002). Drosophila myosin phosphatase and its role in dorsal closure. Development 129, 1215-1223. [PubMed]
  • Murakami, N., Chauhan, V.P.S., and Elzinga, M. (1998). Two nonmuscle isoforms expressed in rabbit brains: filament forming properties, the effects of phosphorylation by protein kinase C and casein kinase II, and location of the phosphorylation sites. Biochemistry 37, 1989-2003. [PubMed]
  • Parker, L., Gross, S., and Alphey, L. (2001). Vectors for the expression of tagged proteins in Drosophila. BioTechniques 31, 1280-1286. [PubMed]
  • Parker, L., Gross, S., Beullens, M., Bollen, M., Bennett, D., and Alphey, L. (2002). Functional interaction between NIPP1 and PP1 in Drosophila: consequences of over-expression of NIPP1 in flies and suppression by co-expression of PP1. Biochem. J. 368, 789-797. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Raghavan, S. et al. (2000). Protein phosphatase 1beta is required for the maintenance of muscle attachments. Curr. Biol. 10, 269-272. [PubMed]
  • Rorth, P. (1998). Gal4 in the Drosophila female germline. Mech. Dev. 78, 113-118. [PubMed]
  • Rudenko, A., Bennett, D., and Alphey, L. (2003). Trithorax interacts with type 1 serine/threonine protein phosphatase Drosophila. EMBO Rep. 4, 59-63. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sellers, J. (2000). Myosins: a diverse superfamily. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1496, 3-22. [PubMed]
  • Skinner, J., and Saltiel, A. (2001). Cloning and identification of MYPT 3, a prenylatable myosin targetting subunit of protein phosphatase 1. Biochem. J. 356, 257-267. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Somlyo, A., and Somlyo, A. (2000). Signal transduction by G-proteins, rho-kinase and protein phosphatase to smooth muscle and non-muscle myosin II. J. Physiol. 522, 177-185. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Strand, J., Nili, M., Homsher, E., and Tobacman, L.S. (2001). Modulation of myosin function by isoform-specific properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and muscle tropomyosin. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34832-34839. [PubMed]
  • Tan, C., Stronach, B., and Perrimon, N. (2003). Roles of myosin phosphatase during Drosophila development. Development 130, 671-681. [PubMed]
  • Tetzlaff, M.T., Jackle, H., and Pankratz, M.J. (1996). Lack of Drosophila cytoskeletal tropomyosin affects head morphogenesis and the accumulation of oscar mRNA required for germ cell formation. EMBO J. 15, 1247-1254. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Varmuza, S., Jurisicova, A., Okano, K., Hudson, J., Boekelheide, K., and Shipp, E.B. (1999). Spermiogenesis is impaired in mice bearing a targeted mutation in the protein phosphatase 1cγ gene. Dev. Biol. 205, 98-110. [PubMed]
  • Wen, K.K., Kuang, B., and Rubenstein, P.A. (2000). Tropomyosin-dependent filament formation by a polymerisation-defective mutant yeast actin (V266G, L267G). J. Biol. Chem. 275, 40594-40600. [PubMed]
  • Winter, C., Wang, B., Ballew, A., Royou, A., Karess, R., Axelrod, J., and Luo, L. (2001). Drosophila Rho-associated kinase (Drok) links Frizzled-mediated planar cell polarity signaling to the actin cytoskeleton. Cell 105, 81-91. [PubMed]
  • Young, P., Richman, A., Ketchum, A., and Kiehart, D. (1993). Morphogenesis in Drosophila requires nonmuscle myosin heavy chain function. Genes Dev. 7, 29-41. [PubMed]

Articles from Molecular Biology of the Cell are provided here courtesy of American Society for Cell Biology
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • EST
    EST
    Published EST sequences
  • Gene
    Gene
    Gene links
  • Gene (nucleotide)
    Gene (nucleotide)
    Records in Gene identified from shared sequence links
  • GEO Profiles
    GEO Profiles
    Related GEO records
  • HomoloGene
    HomoloGene
    HomoloGene links
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • Nucleotide
    Nucleotide
    Published Nucleotide sequences
  • Pathways + GO
    Pathways + GO
    Pathways, annotations and biological systems (BioSystems) that cite the current article.
  • Protein
    Protein
    Published protein sequences
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links
  • Taxonomy
    Taxonomy
    Related taxonomy entry
  • Taxonomy Tree
    Taxonomy Tree

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...