• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of plosbiolPLoS BiologySubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)View this Article
PLoS Biol. Aug 2004; 2(8): e219.
Published online Aug 17, 2004. doi:  10.1371/journal.pbio.0020219
PMCID: PMC509294

A Focused and Efficient Genetic Screening Strategy in the Mouse: Identification of Mutations That Disrupt Cortical Development

Abstract

Although the mechanisms that regulate development of the cerebral cortex have begun to emerge, in large part through the analysis of mutant mice (Boncinelli et al. 2000; Molnar and Hannan 2000; Walsh and Goffinet 2000), many questions remain unanswered. To provide resources for further dissecting cortical development, we have carried out a focused screen for recessive mutations that disrupt cortical development. One aim of the screen was to identify mutants that disrupt the tangential migration of interneurons into the cortex. At the same time, we also screened for mutations that altered the growth or morphology of the cerebral cortex. We report here the identification of thirteen mutants with defects in aspects of cortical development ranging from the establishment of epithelial polarity to the invasion of thalamocortical axons. Among the collection are three novel alleles of genes for which mutant alleles had already been used to explore forebrain development, and four mutants with defects in interneuron migration. The mutants that we describe here will aid in deciphering the molecules and mechanisms that regulate cortical development. Our results also highlight the utility of focused screens in the mouse, in addition to the large-scale and broadly targeted screens that are being carried out at mutagenesis centers.

Introduction

The cerebral cortex is the seat of consciousness and the means by which we carry out abstract reasoning. Understanding how the cortex is assembled during embryonic development will give deeper insights into how this marvelous machine functions and provide the basis for therapy and repair. Although a diversity of approaches will be needed to answer all of our questions, an important starting point in studying events in development is often the careful analysis of mutant phenotypes. Much of what we know about cortical development has emerged through the study of mutations in mice and humans. For example, spontaneous mutations in mice such as reeler and scrambler have helped to tease apart the regulation of the radial migrations that create the cortical layers. Other important insights have come from the study of spontaneous mutations that cause radial migration defects and lead to lissencephaly and similar cortical defects in humans. Our understanding of radial migration and many other aspects of cortical development have also benefited enormously from the application of gene knockout approaches in mice. Despite this progress, many aspects of cortical development remain to be explored and would benefit enormously from additional mutant resources. The tangential migrations of cortical interneurons, for example, are regulated differently from the radial migrations of projection neurons, and only a few mutations have been described that disrupt interneuron migration.

Forward genetic approaches in the mouse, although technically feasible for many years, have become increasingly attractive with the availability of a dense genetic map and a nearly complete genomic sequence. These tools allow the process of gene identification, which was once very cumbersome, to be relatively straightforward. With the initial resurgence of interest in genetic screens, large-scale screens aimed at identifying mutations in broadly defined phenotypic categories were established at mutagenesis centers in Germany, the United Kingdom, the United States, and other countries (Hrabe de Angelis et al. 2000; Nolan et al. 2000). More recently, smaller, more focused screening efforts have had notable success (Vitaterna et al. 1994; Eggenschwiler et al. 2001; Kapfhamer et al. 2002; Garcia-Garcia and Anderson 2003; Hoebe et al. 2003), generally in situations where the effects of mutation on a specific cellular or biochemical process can be readily ascertained. Further development of forward genetics in the mouse as an approach with general utility will require the validation of focused screening strategies that allow for the identification of mutations disrupting specific processes in diverse situations, as has been done in other model organisms. In Drosophila, deletion strains and chromosomal inversions have been used to identify mutations within a specific region of the genome, and this approach has been elegantly adapted for use in the mouse (Juriloff et al. 1985; Kile et al. 2003). The development of screening strategies for the mouse that focus on the identification of mutations affecting a biological process rather than mapping to a certain genomic region will further expand the questions that can be addressed.

Here we describe a focused genetic screen in the mouse that takes advantage of a transgenic reporter line that labels the ganglionic eminences of the ventral forebrain and migrating cortical interneurons with β-galactosidase. The use of this reporter gene allows the isolation of mutations that alter growth and morphogenesis of the cortex very efficiently and, more specifically, allows the identification of mutations disrupting interneuron migration from the ganglionic eminences into the cortex. In this screen, we isolated four mutations that affect tangential migration. We also isolated nine novel mutations affecting other aspects of cortical development; these mutations include three that represent novel alleles of genes that have been shown to have a role in cortical development. These results illustrate the power of a forward genetic approach, borrowed from other model organisms, that can be applied to various questions of mammalian biology.

Results

The Dlx-LacZ Transgene Labels the Ganglionic Eminences and Migrating Interneurons

The expression of Dlx family homeodomain transcription factors is necessary for differentiation of neurons in the striatum and for migration of many, if not all, of the interneuron precursors that arise in the ganglionic eminences of the embryonic telencephalon (Marin and Rubenstein 2001, 2003). A transgenic line in which the expression of β-galactosidase is driven by transcriptional control sequences from the Dlx5/6 intergenic region faithfully recapitulates most aspects of Dlx5 expression in the central nervous system, including strong expression in the subventricular zone (SVZ; a secondary progenitor zone) of the ganglionic eminences, in immature interneurons as they migrate tangentially through the intermediate zone (IZ) or marginal zone (MZ) of the cortex (Figure 1A–1C), and in mature cortical GABAergic interneurons (Stuhmer et al. 2002). The dispersed interneuron precursors label the cerebral cortex, and the underlying high-level expression in the ganglionic eminences provides a useful adjunct to the morphological landmarks, allowing cortical defects to be identified in whole-mount stained embryos. We took advantage of the Dlx-LacZ line as a background upon which to screen for mutations. Mutations were induced using ethyl-nitroso-urea (ENU), a mutagen that induces primarily single-base substitutions with very little bias (Russell et al. 1979; Vrieling et al. 1988; Nivard et al. 1992), and animals were bred in order to detect recessive mutations that disrupted the distribution of Dlx-LacZ–labeled cells in the developing cortex at embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5) (Figure 1D). In total, 705 litters with an average of seven embryos each, and representing 305 lines of mice, were stained using β-galactosidase histochemistry, and then examined in whole mount; higher-resolution analysis on 100-μm coronal vibratome sections of brains was also performed on a third (225) of the litters.

Figure 1
The Strategy for Isolation of Recessive Mutations Disrupting Cortical Development

Dlx-LacZ Allows Efficient Identification of Cortical Mutants

During the course of screening we identified eight mutants with defective growth or patterning of the cerebral cortex, four mutants with defects in the migration of interneuron precursors into the cortex, and one mutant in which thalamocortical axons fail to invade the cortex (Table 1). Lines of mice carrying each mutation were established, in which the phenotype was propagated as a recessive trait with Mendelian inheritance. Preliminary mapping, together with the overt phenotype, pointed us toward a likely locus for three of the mutants (Figure 2). The other ten mutations appear to identify loci whose role in forebrain development has not previously been described.

Figure 2
Novel Alleles of scribble, megalin, and Rfx4
Table 1
Summary of Cortical Mutants

A Novel scribble Allele

The three mutations in previously characterized loci produce alleles that differ from the existing ones in informative ways (Figure 2). Mice homozygous for the line 90 mutation have an open neural tube in the spinal cord and hindbrain region, or craniorachischisis, and a disorganized and hyperplastic neuroepithelium in the cortex and other parts of the central nervous system (Figure 2A and and2B).2B). An essentially identical phenotype is seen in homozygous Loop-tail and Circletail mutants (Kibar et al. 2001; Murdoch et al. 2001a, 2001b, 2003), both of which also have dominant tail defects, a phenotype that is not seen in line 90. Both Loop-tail and Circletail mice have mutations in genes that regulate planar cell polarity. Loop-tail mice carry a mutation in the strabismus-1 gene (Str-1, also known as Ltap/Lpp1), and Circletail mice have a mutation in the scribble gene (Scrb1). Mapping of the line 90 mutation places it on Chromosome 15 in the region of Scrb1. Scrb1 encodes a protein of 1,665 amino acids with three leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains near the amino terminus and four centrally located PDZ domains (Figure 2F). Sequencing of RT-PCR products from line 90 mice identified a missense mutation in Scrb1 that causes an isoleucine-to-lysine substitution in the third LRR domain (Figure 2C–2F).

In Drosophila, a critical role for a Scrb1 homolog, scribbled, in establishment of apical basal polarity in epithelia has been described (Bilder and Perrimon 2000; Bilder et al. 2000, 2003). Analysis of mice carrying the Circletail allele of Scrb1 show a loss of planar cell polarity in the hair cells of the inner ear, indicating that Scrb1 is required for the establishment of planar cell polarity rather than apical-basal polarity in the mouse (Montcouquiol et al. 2003). Interestingly, a strong genetic interaction has been observed between the Circletail allele of Scrb1 and Loop-tail mutants (Murdoch et al. 2001b). The interaction is strong enough that compound heterozygotes for the two mutations show a severe phenotype that is indistinguishable from the individual homozygous phenotypes. The molecular nature of the Circletail allele of Scrb1, with a frameshift mutation that causes a premature stop codon after the first two PDZ domains (Murdoch et al. 2003), is substantially different from that of line 90. To see whether interaction between the two loci was a unique attribute of the Circletail allele, we crossed line 90 with Loop-tail mice. As with the Circletail allele, a strong genetic interaction was seen between the line 90 allele of Scrb1 and the Ltap/Lpp1 mutation, such that embryos indistinguishable from homozygotes of the individual mutations were recovered (unpublished data). This indicates quite clearly that the integrity of the LRR domains is critical for the tight coordination between Scrb1 and Ltap/Lpp1 in establishment of planar cell polarity.

A Novel megalin Allele

We also identified a mutation that caused an enlarged cortex, hypertrophy of the choroid plexus of the third ventricle, and abnormalities in the dorsal diencephalon (Figure 2G–2J). Mapping of this mutation places it on Chromosome 2 in a region containing the megalin gene (also known as Lrp2). Prolapse of the third ventricle choroid plexus was described in a knockout allele of megalin (Willnow et al. 1996), suggesting that this might be the responsible locus in this case. On this basis we sequenced RT-PCR products from the megalin gene and identified a base substitution producing a premature stop codon rather than the tyrosine codon at residue 2721 (Figure 2K and and2L).2L). The ENU-induced allele is predicted to express a truncated MEGALIN protein consisting of the amino-terminal portion of the extracellular domain, whereas the knockout is a null. Unlike the case of Scrb1, where the phenotypes produced by the two alleles are essentially identical, the two megalin alleles show phenotypic differences. Although both alleles produce a hypertrophic choroid plexus, this defect is more pronounced with the ENU-induced allele. We have found that the choroid plexus defects are also associated with an expansion and inhibition of differentiation in the dorsal neuroepithelium of the diencephalon that would ordinarily form the subcommissural organ and of the pineal gland just caudal to the defective choroid plexus (see Figure 2I–2J; A. Ashique, unpublished data). It is not possible to say from the published characterization of the knockout allele whether a similar condition occurs there, but it is clear that the knockout allele causes holoprosencephaly (Willnow et al. 1996), a phenotype that we have not seen in line 267. Indeed, the ENU-induced allele causes an enlarged cortex (Figure 2G and and2H)2H) without any obvious deficiency of midline structures such as would be expected in even mild holoprosencephaly.

A Novel Rfx4 Allele

A morphologically identifiable dorsal midline is absent from the cerebral cortex of line 269 homozygotes (Figure 2M–2P). This is an unusual defect that is similar to that seen in a transgene insertion mutation that disrupts the Rfx4 gene (Blackshear et al. 2003). The line 269 mutation was mapped to Chromosome 10 in the region containing Rfx4. Sequencing of Rfx4 revealed a base substitution that changes an evolutionarily conserved leucine residue to proline (Figure 2Q and and2R).2R). RFX4 is a member of the Rfx subfamily of winged-helix transcription factors (Emery et al. 1996) and can form dimers with two of the other family members, RFX2 and RFX3 (Morotomi-Yano et al. 2002). The amino acid substitution affects the conserved C domain of RFX4's large dimerization domain (Katan-Khaykovich et al. 1999). The transgene insertion mutation, on the other hand, selectively eliminates the expression of a neural-specific transcript of the gene, and so behaves as a tissue-specific null (Blackshear et al. 2003). Dimerization is not necessary for DNA binding activity of Rfx-class transcription factors (Katan et al. 1997; Katan-Khaykovich and Shaul 1998). Instead, dimerization appears to determine whether the bound transcription factor mediates transcriptional activation or repression. The fact that the line 269 allele produces a phenotype that is apparently identical to that of a null allele provides clear evidence that RFX4-containing dimers regulate important transcriptional regulatory events during formation of the cortical midline.

Dlx-LacZ Allows Efficient Identification of Tangential Migration Mutants

Four mutants were identified in which the morphology of the cortex was normal at E14.5, but in which the distribution of LacZ-expressing cells in the cortex was altered. Three mutants, 154, 239, and 275, were identified on the basis of defects that are apparent in whole-mount preparations. Defects in the fourth mutant, 251, were only apparent upon examining sections. All four mutations are, for unknown reasons, perinatal lethal when homozygous, and this has prevented us from analyzing adult phenotypes. In addition, the line 154, 239, and 275 mutations appear to cause an increase in spontaneous seizures and mortality in young adult heterozygotes. Because the seizures are sporadic, their basis has not yet been studied.

Line 154 has the most severe defects. Affected embryos often have fewer labeled cells in the cortex except in the most rostral regions, where they form abnormal aggregates (Figure 3A and and3B).3B). Abnormalities in the LacZ expression pattern that are associated with the failure of cells to invade the developing cortex can also be found in the subcortical telencephalon of line 154 embryos (Figure 3C–3H). Here, prominent, radially oriented columns of cells form near or at boundaries between subcortical subdivisions: the dorsal LGE, the ventral LGE, and the medial ganglionic eminence. To confirm that the abnormal pattern of LacZ expression was due to a perturbation in the distribution of interneurons in the cortex and not the result of ectopic expression of the transgene, we examined the expression of an interneuron marker, glutamic acid decarboxylase 1 (Gad67). Interneurons are GABAergic and so express GAD67, an enzyme involved in GABA synthesis. Glutamatergic projection neurons do not express GAD67. Whole-mount in situ analysis of GAD67 at E15.5 showed that the distribution of interneurons was abnormal, as predicted by the aberrant expression of the transgene (Figure 3I and and33J).

Figure 3
Severe Disruption of Interneuron Migration in Line 154 Mutants

Three Migration Mutants Have Defects in a Common Process

Lines 239, 251, and 275 share features that suggest that the loci involved may have roles in a common regulatory process. All three mutations produce defects that are most apparent in the rostral cortex at E14.5, and all three cause anterior polydactyly (Figure 4A–4C; unpublished data). The limb defects might be only superficially similar or they could have a common developmental basis. If the latter explanation were true, it would strongly suggest that the neuronal migration phenotypes of the three mutants are similar because the same regulatory mechanism is defective in all of them. Initial mapping uncovered linkage to Chromosome 7 for the line 251 mutation and to Chromosome 10 for the other two, indicating that at least two distinct loci are involved (Table 1). To determine the number of loci involved, complementation tests were carried out using crosses between all three lines. The line 251 mutation complemented the other two as expected, but crosses between line 239 and line 275 produced mutant embryos with both limb and forebrain defects that were indistinguishable from either parental line. Further study will be required to determine whether the two lines carry the same or two independent mutations.

Figure 4
Limb Patterning Defects in Tangential Migration Mutants

To identify the developmental basis of the limb defects, we examined the expression of genes involved in limb patterning. A regulatory network involving Shh and Fgf4 regulates the expression of Hoxd13 and controls patterning of the limb (Figure 4D). We first investigated the expression of Hoxd13 as a molecular marker of anterior-posterior (A-P) pattern in the limb at early stages. Hoxd13 is ectopically expressed in the anterior portion of line 239 and line 251 mutant limbs (Figure 4E–4G), indicating that the anterior polydactyly is caused by a defect in A-P patterning. We next examined the expression of the elements of the network that regulate Hoxd13 expression (Figure 4D) to see whether their expression was perturbed. The expression of Shh, Ptc1, gremlin (also known as Cktsf1b1), and Bmp4 are not distinguishable from wild-type (WT) (unpublished data). In contrast, an ectopic domain of FGF4 persists in the anterior apical ectodermal ridge (AER) (Figure 4H–4J). Thus the defects in limb patterning result from disruption of a step downstream of Shh, Ptc1, gremlin, and Bmp4, and upstream of Fgf4. This does not allow a specific molecular mechanism to be invoked, yet the combination of similar defects in both the limb and in the pattern of interneuron migration is strong evidence that the same molecular mechanism is disrupted in all three mutants.

Migrating Cells Persist Abnormally in the IZ of 239, 251, and 275

The 239, 251, and 275 mutants have clusters of LacZ-expressing cells in the IZ and/or SVZ of the rostral cortex, whereas more caudally, defects appear milder (Figure 5). In WT animals there is a clear demarcation, at the corticostriatal junction, between the SVZ of the dorsal LGE and the stream of cells migrating into the cortex (black arrowheads in Figure 5C–5E). The crispness of this boundary is lost in the 239 and 275 lines (yellow ovals in Figure 5F–5H and and55L–5N), although not in 251. In all three mutants, occasional linear aggregates of LacZ-expressing cells extend from the IZ/SVZ to the MZ (red arrowheads in Figure 5I and and55N).

Figure 5
Line 239, 251, and 275 Mutants Have Similar Migration Defects

To study the effects of the mutations at later stages of cortical interneuron development, we examined near-term (E18.5) animals (Figure 6). We focused our analysis on line 251 and evaluated the expression of the Dlx-LacZ transgene and Gad67. As at E14.5, aggregation of Gad67+; LacZ+ cells in the IZ/SVZ is a prominent feature of the phenotype (black arrowheads, Figure 6B, B,6F,6F, and and6J).6J). Despite the severity of the defects observed in the IZ/SVZ, Dlx-LacZ–expressing interneuron precursors in the MZ and in the cortical plate do not form aggregates (yellow and blue arrowheads in Figure 6I and and6J),6J), suggesting that the mutation inhibits the ability of migrating interneurons to leave the IZ/SVZ, but does not significantly impact other aspects of their migration.

Figure 6
Dlx-LacZ and GAD67 Expression Show that Interneuron Precursors Persist in the IZ/SVZ of 251 Mutant Cortices

A Mutant with Defects in Invasion of the Cortex by Thalamocortical Axons

In addition to the seven mutants described in the previous sections, six other mutants were isolated. Most of these have not been characterized in detail, but one, line 412, illustrates the range of phenotypes that the Dlx-LacZ transgene allowed us to identify. In line 412, the mutant phenotype was detectable in whole mount as a subtle but consistent defect near the cortical-subcortical boundary. Upon sectioning, this defect was revealed to be a delamination in the region of the external capsule (Figure 7A–7D). Thalamocortical fibers ordinarily enter the cortex at this point, and this defect can occur when fewer axon tracts cross this zone (Hevner et al. 2002). Indeed, the 412 mutant has fewer thalamocortical fibers traversing the corticostriatal boundary at E14.5, as evidenced by the reduced density of L1+ axons in this location (Figure 7E and and7F).7F). Examination of late-stage embryos shows that the lack of cortical invasion by thalamocortical fibers at E14.5 is due to a persistent inhibition and not merely a delay in innervation (unpublished data). The IZ of the cortex often appears thinner in mutants, consistent with the absence of thalamocortical axons. Interestingly, TAG1+ corticofugal axons are still present in the cortex (Figure 7G and and7H).7H). Analysis of markers for the dorsal thalamus, where the thalamocortical axons originate, and for the striatum, which they must traverse, does not reveal any obvious defects (A. Ashique, personal communication). This, together with the observation that corticofugal fibers appear to be intact, suggests that the mutation may disrupt a molecule that is directly involved in pathfinding by thalamocortical axons.

Figure 7
Corticostriatal Delamination and Lack of the Thalamocortical Projection in Line 412 Mutants

Discussion

Novel ENU-Induced Alleles

ENU overwhelmingly induces single-basepair substitution mutations. The mutant alleles that are produced often have relatively selective effects on protein function, and so provide valuable probes of the function of different protein domains. This is illustrated by two of the alleles described here, Rfx4 and Scrb1. Each of these alleles is a missense mutation that appears to disrupt specific domains in a selective fashion.

The SCRB1 protein has two sets of recognizable domains: three amino-terminal LRRs and four, more carboxy-terminal, PDZ domains. The previously described allele of Scrb1, the Circletail allele, has a stop codon that terminates translation after the first two PDZ domains. In contrast, the line 90 allele of Scrb1 is predicted to encode a charged lysine in place of a hydrophobic isoleucine on the outside of the third LRR domain (see Figure 2D and and2E).2E). The homozygous phenotypes produced by the line 90 and the Circletail alleles are apparently identical, and both show strong genetic interactions with a mutation in Str-1, a cell-surface protein that regulates planar cell polarity in both flies and mammals. From this we can conclude that both the LRR and the PDZ domains are required for SCRB1's role in the establishment of epithelial polarity.

The missense allele of Rfx4 is predicted to have very subtle effects on the structure of the protein. The mutation causes a proline to be substituted for a leucine residue in a dimerization domain of the protein. Proline residues are not compatible with α-helices, but in this case the substitution appears to be at the beginning of a β-turn that links two helices. Presumably, the substitution causes the linkage between the α-helices to be stiffened or abnormally constrained in some way. Whatever the exact molecular consequences are, the nature of the allele and the genetics suggest that the mutation prevents dimerization. Ordinarily RFX4 can dimerize with itself and with the related transcription factors RFX2 and RFX3 (Morotomi-Yano et al. 2002). If inactive dimers were produced by the missense allele, it would seem likely to cause a dominant phenotype, which it does not. Studies are underway that will test these ideas as well as determine whether the failure of the dorsal midline to form is the result of a loss of a dorsal signaling center or an inability of the cortical neuroepithelium to respond to those signals.

The megalin allele provides a contrast to these first two cases. Despite its molecular severity as a premature stop codon, its phenotypic consequences are less pronounced than the knockout allele. The knockout mutation produces early-head-fold–stage embryos with reduced neuroepithelium in the anterior midline (Willnow et al. 1996). These defects originate during gastrulation, and by mid-gestation result in holoprosencephaly. The absence of these early defects in the ENU-induced allele could be interpreted to mean that the defective protein retains some function and supplies the MEGALIN activity that is required during gastrulation. Alternatively, it is possible that the deleted region in the knockout is required for the proper expression of a neighboring gene and that the gastrulation phenotype does not reflect an early role for megalin.

In each of these three cases, the ENU-induced allele provides novel information about the role of the gene in cortical development and suggests avenues for further exploration. As we determine the molecular nature of the other mutations, it is likely that the selective nature of the ENU-induced alleles will provide important insights into the function of other proteins that regulate cortical development.

Nature of the Tangential Migration Defects

The migration of immature interneurons has been followed using lipophilic dyes, tissue chimeras, transfection with a green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression vector, and, recently, using a Gad67-GFP knockin mouse (de Carlos et al. 1996; Anderson et al. 1997, 2001; Tamamaki et al. 1997; Denaxa et al. 2001; Polleux et al. 2002; Ang et al. 2003). These studies have identified tangentially migrating cells in both the IZ/SVZ and the MZ. Some studies have concluded that the cells in the IZ/SVZ and the MZ are two independent migratory streams (Lavdas et al. 1999). In contrast, the use of a Gad67-GFP knockin allele to follow interneuron precursors (Tanaka et al. 2003) led to the conclusion that the general pattern of cell migration is tangentially through the IZ and thence radially outward from the IZ to the MZ. Cells in the MZ also migrate tangentially but at a slower rate than those in the IZ (Polleux et al. 2002; Tanaka et al. 2003), in a process that may be a search for the proper location at which to invade the cortical plate (Ang et al. 2003). These two models for tangential migration produce different interpretations of the pattern of defects that we see in our novel mutants. In the first model, obvious defects in the IZ but not the MZ would imply that the mutations are disrupting a process used to regulate migration through the IZ but not through the independently regulated MZ. In the second model, the predominance of defects in the IZ/SVZ would indicate an inhibition at an early step of the migratory process. The presence of cell aggregates extending from the IZ to the MZ is consistent with this being the step that is defective, whereas the presence of properly dispersed cells in the MZ and cortical plate would indicate that the mutations inhibit, but do not completely block, this early step.

Concordance of Limb Patterning and Migration Defects

Three out of the four tangential migration defects also result in anterior polydactyly. The association of limb patterning and neuronal migration defects has not been previously reported and, given that a great deal more is known about limb patterning than about tangential migration, it is tempting to speculate on what this may imply about the migration mutants. One possibility is that shared mechanisms are used to pattern the telencephalon and the limb. It is equally possible that genes that regulate patterning in the limb regulate cell migration decisions more directly. Mutations in an arista-less homolog, Arx, cause profound defects in interneuron migrations, and mutations in another arista-less homolog, Alx4, cause anterior polydactyly. However, as the limbs of Alx4 mutants, unlike the 239, 251, and 275 mutants, have ectopic Shh expression in the anterior limb bud, it is unlikely that the mutations described here disrupt an arista-less pathway. Shh maintains the expression of Fgf4 in the posterior AER of WT limb buds in a process that requires gremlin. Genes that act in this process downstream of Bmp4 are plausible candidates for the line 239, 251, and 275 mutations.

General Implications for Genetic Screens in the Mouse

The work described here demonstrates clearly that genetic screening strategies in the mouse need not be limited to general or broad-based phenotyping approaches; a focused genetic screening strategy can provide a powerful means of dissecting a specific aspect of mammalian biology. The strategy of broad-based approaches has been an effective one for the past several years as the collection of mutants using chemically induced mutations resurged in popularity. In other genetic systems, strategies have evolved from general toward focused screens that allow mutations affecting a specific process to be identified, and it is likely that mouse genetics will progress in a similar fashion. An additional concern with mice, however, is the cost of breeding and housing, which is higher than that for other model genetic organisms. We have shown, nonetheless, that a laboratory-based, focused screening strategy is a productive pursuit. The costs of such a screen could be shared by the careful combination of reporters so that screening for several distinct processes could be carried out at once. This general idea is highlighted by our isolation of mutations in which the growth and patterning of the cortex is defective. With the exception of line 90, the identification of these mutants benefited from the easy visualization of cortical size and structure by expression of the transgene. In several cases, the interneuron migration mutants being a good example, the identification of the mutant phenotype without the transgene would have been very unlikely. Independent reporters could be used to pursue the simultaneous identification of several different classes of mutants more directly. For example, reporters that label migrating neurons with GFP, and thalamocortical axons with β-galactosidase or alkaline phosphatase, would allow both migration and axonal pathfinding mutations to be identified in the same screen. Given the large number of reporter and indicator strains that have been made over the last few years and the powerful tools that exist for gene identification, it is clear that focused screens in the mouse will provide the resources to address many questions in the coming years.

Materials and Methods

Animals and breeding.

Male C57BL/6J mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, Maine, United States) and treated with three intraperitoneal injections of 100 mg/kg ENU (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) spaced at 7-d intervals. Eight weeks after the last injection, the ENU-treated males were set up in breeding pairs with FVB/NJ females homozygous for the Dlx-LacZ transgene. Male offspring of this cross (G1 males) were backcrossed to the transgenic line, and female offspring (G2 females) were saved. For each line, one to six of the G2 females were backcrossed to their fathers to generate timed pregnancies. Embryos were harvested either 13 d (the first 100 lines) or 14 d (all subsequent lines) after the vaginal plug was identified.

Screening.

Embryos were dissected in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed for 45 min at room temperature in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS. Subsequently, embryos were washed in detergent rinse (0.1 M phosphate buffer [pH 7.3], 2 mM MgCl2, 0.01% sodium deoxycholate and 0.02% Nonidet P-40). Embryos were then stained for 48–72 h at room temperature on a rocking platform using X-gal as a substrate for the detection of β-galactosidase activity. Staining was terminated after visual inspection by repeated washing in PBS. Embryos were then fixed again and stored in 4% PFA in PBS until further examined. All litters were examined in whole mount and approximately one-half were selected for sectioning on a vibratome (VT1000S; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). For sectioning, the heads of all pups from a litter were separated from the torsos and mounted aligned in the same orientation in an agarose block. Sections 100 μm thick were collected in PBS and mounted in Kaiser's glycerol gelatin (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) on slides. All phenotypes reported here were seen in more than ten litters resulting from both G1 male × G2 female and G2 male × G2 female crosses.

Histology.

Whole-mount in situ hybridization was carried out according to Henrique et al. (1995). Gad67 in situ hybridization on sections was carried out following standard protocols (Dagerlind et al. 1992) with a digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probe generated by in vitro transcription using a plasmid obtained from Brian G. Condie (Maddox and Condie 2001). In brief, embryos were dissected in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated PBS, and the heads were removed and fresh-frozen on dry ice. Tissue was sectioned at 20 μm on a cryostat (Leica CM3050). Slide-mounted cryosections were warmed to room temperature and fixed in 4% PFA in PBS. Deacetylation was performed for 10 min by immersion in 0.1 M triethanolamine containing 25 mM acetic anhydride followed by rinsing in 2× saline sodium citrate and dehydration through an increasing alcohol series (60%, 75%, 95%, and 100%). Sections were hybridized with the riboprobe under stringent conditions (50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.3 M NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.02% Ficoll 400, 0.02% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 0.02% BSA, 0.5 mg/ml tRNA, 0.2 mg/ml carrier DNA, and 200 mM DTT) for 16–20 h at 63 °C. After hybridization, sections were washed four times in 4× saline sodium citrate solution and incubated for 30 min in RNase buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 0.5 M NaCl, and 5 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]) containing 20 μg/ml RNase A at 37 °C. High-stringency washes were performed twice for 30 min at 63 °C. Incubation with the anti-digoxigenin antibody (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) was carried out in maleic acid buffer (100 mM maleic acid, 150 mM NaCl, and 1% blocking reagent [Roche]). Finally, staining was performed with BM purple substrate (Roche) terminated by repeated washes in PBS, and sections were coverslipped using Kaiser's glycerol gelatin. Nuclear fast red counterstaining for X-gal–stained sections was performed with pre-made staining solution (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California, United States). Staining was differentiated in 70% ethanol.

Immunohistochemistry using anti-TAG1 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States) and anti-L1 (Chemikon, Mönchengladback, Germany) antibodies was performed on 100-μm free-floating sections following the instructions and using the reagents of the Vectastain ABC Kit (Vector). Primary antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:500. Horseradish peroxidase activity from secondary antibodies was revealed by diaminobenzidine as a substrate in staining buffer (0.5 mg/ml diaminobenzidine, 20 mM sodium cacodylate, and 30 mN acetic acid).

Mapping.

Initial linkage was established using 12 DNA samples from both carriers and mutant embryos. We scored a set of 82 simple sequence repeat markers. The panel of markers was selected from the set at the Center for Inherited Disease Research Website (http://www.cidr.jhmi.edu/mouse/mouse.html). Markers were chosen that could be scored easily on agarose gels. All chromosomal assignments reported are the result of LOD scores significantly greater than three. The intervals that are listed in Table 1 were derived following the initial establishment of linkage by haplotype analysis that included additional recombinant chromosomes from mutant animals or obligate carriers. The phenotypes of 239 and 275 are very similar, and the fact that they map to the same interval likely reflects allelism. The localization of both 351 and 357 to the same interval seems more likely to be coincidental, because the phenotypes are quite different.

Sequencing.

For sequencing of Rfx4 and Scrb1 genes, RT-PCR samples were prepared from cDNA prepared using E10.5 to E16.5 embryos. For megalin, exons were amplified using genomic DNA samples. Primer sequences are available upon request. In both cases sequencing was done by the University of California, Berkeley, DNA Sequencing Facility.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Cortical Size Is Altered in Lines 152 and 351:

(A) Dorsal views of the cortex of WT (left) and line 152 mutant (right) embryos stained for expression of the Dlx-LacZ transgene. The line 152 mutation reduces the size of the cortex.

(B and C) Coronal sections through the cortex of E14.5 WT (B) and line 351 mutant (C) embryos. The cortex has a characteristic high-domed shape and is thinner in the mutant.

(D and E) Dorsal (D) and ventral (E) views of adult brains of WT (left) and line 351 mutant (right) brains. The cortex is overall larger in the mutant than in the WT. The olfactory bulbs are present in the mutant but are tucked under the cortex, making them less visible.

(9.1 MB TIF).

Figure S2

Central Nervous System Defects and Cleft Upper Jaw in Lines 366 and 357:

(A) Lateral view of an E14.5 WT embryo.

(B) The cleft upper jaw of a line 366 mutant is visible at the left. The telencephalon, including the cortex, is significantly shortened along the rostrocaudal axis.

(C and D) Lateral and front views of the cleft and reduced upper jaw of an E18.5 embryo homozygous for the line 366 mutation.

(E and F) Lateral views of WT (E) and line 357 homozygote (F) embryos at E13.5 showing the reduced telencephalon and relatively expanded midbrain.

(G) A front view of the embryo in (F) shows the cleft upper jaw.

(H and I) Sagittal sections through E13.5 WT (H) and line 357 (I) embryos. The overgrown midbrain in the mutant embryo has forced the neuroepithelium into folds.

(9.9 MB TIF).

Figure S3

Line 407 Mutants Have Dorsoventral Defects in the Cortical Primordia and Facial Midline Defects:

(A) Lateral view of an E14.5 mutant embryo showing edema and hemorrhage suggestive of vascular defects. Frontal views of WT (B) and mutant (C) embryos illustrate the narrowed frontonasal process, maxilla, and mandible of the mutant. (D) shows coronal hemisections in a WT embryo. (E) shows the accumulation of Dlx-LacZ–positive cells in a SVZ-like area dorsal to the LGE.

(4.3 MB TIF).

Accession Numbers

Accession numbers of the genes discussed in this paper are available at LocusLink (http://www.ncbi.nih.gov/LocusLink, and are as follows: Alx4 (11695), Arx (11878), Bmp4 (12159), Dlx5/6 (13395/13396), Fgf4 (14175), Gad67 (14415), gremlin (23892), Hoxd13 (15433), L1 (16728), Lrp2 (14725), Ltap/Lpp1 (93840), Ptc1 (19206), Rfx4 (71137), Scrb1 (105782), scribbled (44448), Shh (20423), and Tag1 (21367).

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Amir Ashique for permission to cite unpublished work, Dr. Viktor Kharazia for help and advice with histological analysis, and Marlene Lane for help with many aspects of animal breeding and husbandry and for help with the early stages of the screen. We also thank Deanna Louie, Kristina Bray, Tyler Wai Chan, and William Tseng for their assistance.

This research was supported in part by funds provided by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Mental Health, award number R21 MH068525 (ASP); a Human Frontiers Science Program Grant, number RG0160/2000-B (ASP); a Wills Foundation Fellowship (KZ); and a Broad Foundation Fellowship (SM). It was also supported in part by funds provided by the State of California for medical research on alcohol and substance abuse through the University of California, San Francisco.

Abbreviations

AER
apical ectodermal ridge
A-P
anterior-posterior
E[number]
embryonic day [number]
ENU
ethyl-nitroso-urea
GFP
green fluorescent protein
IZ
intermediate zone
LGE
lateral ganglionic eminence
LRR
leucine-rich repeat
MZ
marginal zone
P[number]
postnatal day [number]
PBS
phosphate-buffered saline
PFA
paraformaldehyde
Shh
sonic hedgehog; SVZ
WT
wild-type

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest. The authors have declared that no conflicts of interest exist.

Author contributions. ASP conceived the screen. ASP, KZ, SRM, and YS designed and performed the experiments. KZ, SRM, YS, JLRR, and ASP analyzed the data. ME contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. ASP, KZ, and SRM wrote the paper.

Academic Editor: Joshua R. Sanes, Harvard University

Citation: Zarbalis K, May SR, Shen Y, Ekker M, Rubenstein JLR, Peterson AS (2004) A focused and efficient genetic screening strategy in the mouse: Identification of mutations that disrupt cortical development. PLoS Biol 2(8): e219.

References

  • Anderson SA, Eisenstat DD, Shi L, Rubenstein JL. Interneuron migration from basal forebrain to neocortex: Dependence on Dlx genes. Science. 1997;278:474–476. [PubMed]
  • Anderson SA, Marin O, Horn C, Jennings K, Rubenstein JL. Distinct cortical migrations from the medial and lateral ganglionic eminences. Development. 2001;128:353–363. [PubMed]
  • Ang ES, Haydar TF, Gluncic V, Rakic P. Four-dimensional migratory coordinates of GABAergic interneurons in the developing mouse cortex. J Neurosci. 2003;23:5805–5815. [PubMed]
  • Bilder D, Perrimon N. Localization of apical epithelial determinants by the basolateral PDZ protein Scribble. Nature. 2000;403:676–680. [PubMed]
  • Bilder D, Li M, Perrimon N. Cooperative regulation of cell polarity and growth by Drosophila tumor suppressors. Science. 2000;289:113–116. [PubMed]
  • Bilder D, Schober M, Perrimon N. Integrated activity of PDZ protein complexes regulates epithelial polarity. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:53–58. [PubMed]
  • Blackshear PJ, Graves JP, Stumpo DJ, Cobos I, Rubenstein JL, et al. Graded phenotypic response to partial and complete deficiency of a brain-specific transcript variant of the winged helix transcription factor RFX4. Development. 2003;130:4539–4552. [PubMed]
  • Boncinelli E, Mallamaci A, Muzio L. Genetic control of regional identity in the developing vertebrate forebrain. Novartis Found Symp. 2000;228:53–61. 61–56, 109–113. [PubMed]
  • Dagerlind A, Friberg K, Bean AJ, Hokfelt T. Sensitive mRNA detection using unfixed tissue: Combined radioactive and non-radioactive in situ hybridization histochemistry. Histochemistry. 1992;98:39–49. [PubMed]
  • de Carlos JA, Lopez-Mascaraque L, Valverde F. Dynamics of cell migration from the lateral ganglionic eminence in the rat. J Neurosci. 1996;16:6146–6156. [PubMed]
  • Denaxa M, Chan CH, Schachner M, Parnavelas JG, Karagogeos D. The adhesion molecule TAG-1 mediates the migration of cortical interneurons from the ganglionic eminence along the corticofugal fiber system. Development. 2001;128:4635–4644. [PubMed]
  • Eggenschwiler JT, Espinoza E, Anderson KV. Rab23 is an essential negative regulator of the mouse Sonic hedgehog signalling pathway. Nature. 2001;412:194–198. [PubMed]
  • Emery P, Durand B, Mach B, Reith W. RFX proteins, a novel family of DNA binding proteins conserved in the eukaryotic kingdom. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24:803–807. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Garcia-Garcia MJ, Anderson KV. Essential role of glycosaminoglycans in Fgf signaling during mouse gastrulation. Cell. 2003;114:727–737. [PubMed]
  • Henrique D, Adam J, Myat A, Chitnis A, Lewis J, et al. Expression of a Delta homologue in prospective neurons in the chick. Nature. 1995;375:787–790. [PubMed]
  • Hevner RF, Miyashita-Lin E, Rubenstein JL. Cortical and thalamic axon pathfinding defects in Tbr1, Gbx2, and Pax6 mutant mice: Evidence that cortical and thalamic axons interact and guide each other. J Comp Neurol. 2002;447:8–17. [PubMed]
  • Hoebe K, Du X, Goode J, Mann N, Beutler B. Lps2: A new locus required for responses to lipopolysaccharide, revealed by germline mutagenesis and phenotypic screening. J Endotoxin Res. 2003;9:250–255. [PubMed]
  • Hrabe de Angelis MH, Flaswinkel H, Fuchs H, Rathkolb B, Soewarto D, et al. Genome-wide, large-scale production of mutant mice by ENU mutagenesis. Nat Genet. 2000;25:444–447. [PubMed]
  • Juriloff DM, Sulik KK, Roderick TH, Hogan BK. Genetic and developmental studies of a new mouse mutation that produces otocephaly. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1985;5:121–145. [PubMed]
  • Kapfhamer D, Valladares O, Sun Y, Nolan PM, Rux JJ, et al. Mutations in Rab3a alter circadian period and homeostatic response to sleep loss in the mouse. Nat Genet. 2002;32:290–295. [PubMed]
  • Katan Y, Agami R, Shaul Y. The transcriptional activation and repression domains of RFX1, a context-dependent regulator, can mutually neutralize their activities. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3621–3628. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Katan-Khaykovich Y, Shaul Y. RFX1, a single DNA-binding protein with a split dimerization domain, generates alternative complexes. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:24504–24512. [PubMed]
  • Katan-Khaykovich Y, Spiegel I, Shaul Y. The dimerization/repression domain of RFX1 is related to a conserved region of its yeast homologues Crt1 and Sak1: A new function for an ancient motif. J Mol Biol. 1999;294:121–137. [PubMed]
  • Kibar Z, Vogan KJ, Groulx N, Justice MJ, Underhill DA, et al. Ltap, a mammalian homolog of Drosophila Strabismus/Van Gogh, is altered in the mouse neural tube mutant Loop-tail. Nat Genet. 2001;28:251–255. [PubMed]
  • Kile BT, Hentges KE, Clark AT, Nakamura H, Salinger AP, et al. Functional genetic analysis of mouse chromosome 11. Nature. 2003;425:81–86. [PubMed]
  • Lavdas AA, Grigoriou M, Pachnis V, Parnavelas JG. The medial ganglionic eminence gives rise to a population of early neurons in the developing cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 1999;19:7881–7888. [PubMed]
  • Maddox DM, Condie BG. Dynamic expression of a glutamate decarboxylase gene in multiple non-neural tissues during mouse development. BMC Dev Biol. 2001;1:1. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Marin O, Rubenstein JL. A long, remarkable journey: Tangential migration in the telencephalon. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:780–790. [PubMed]
  • Marin O, Rubenstein JL. Cell migration in the forebrain. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003;26:441–483. [PubMed]
  • Molnar Z, Hannan AJ. Development of thalamocortical projections in normal and mutant mice. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2000;30:293–332. [PubMed]
  • Montcouquiol M, Rachel RA, Lanford PJ, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, et al. Identification of Vangl2 and Scrb1 as planar polarity genes in mammals. Nature. 2003;423:173–177. [PubMed]
  • Morotomi-Yano K, Yano K, Saito H, Sun Z, Iwama A, et al. Human regulatory factor X 4 (RFX4) is a testis-specific dimeric DNA-binding protein that cooperates with other human RFX members. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:836–842. [PubMed]
  • Murdoch JN, Doudney K, Paternotte C, Copp AJ, Stanier P. Severe neural tube defects in the loop-tail mouse result from mutation of Lpp1, a novel gene involved in floor plate specification. Hum Mol Genet. 2001a;10:2593–2601. [PubMed]
  • Murdoch JN, Rachel RA, Shah S, Beermann F, Stanier P, et al. Circletail, a new mouse mutant with severe neural tube defects: Chromosomal localization and interaction with the loop-tail mutation. Genomics. 2001b;78:55–63. [PubMed]
  • Murdoch JN, Henderson DJ, Doudney K, Gaston-Massuet C, Phillips HM, et al. Disruption of scribble (Scrb1) causes severe neural tube defects in the circletail mouse. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:87–98. [PubMed]
  • Nivard MJ, Pastink A, Vogel EW. Molecular analysis of mutations induced in the vermilion gene of Drosophila melanogaster by methyl methanesulfonate. Genetics. 1992;131:673–682. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nolan PM, Peters J, Strivens M, Rogers D, Hagan J, et al. A systematic, genome-wide, phenotype-driven mutagenesis programme for gene function studies in the mouse. Nat Genet. 2000;25:440–443. [PubMed]
  • Polleux F, Whitford KL, Dijkhuizen PA, Vitalis T, Ghosh A. Control of cortical interneuron migration by neurotrophins and PI3-kinase signaling. Development. 2002;129:3147–3160. [PubMed]
  • Russell WL, Kelly EM, Hunsicker PR, Bangham JW, Maddux SC, et al. Specific-locus test shows ethylnitrosourea to be the most potent mutagen in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76:5818–5819. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stuhmer T, Puelles L, Ekker M, Rubenstein JL. Expression from a Dlx gene enhancer marks adult mouse cortical GABAergic neurons. Cereb Cortex. 2002;12:75–85. [PubMed]
  • Tamamaki N, Fujimori KE, Takauji R. Origin and route of tangentially migrating neurons in the developing neocortical intermediate zone. J Neurosci. 1997;17:8313–8323. [PubMed]
  • Tanaka D, Nakaya Y, Yanagawa Y, Obata K, Murakami F. Multimodal tangential migration of neocortical GABAergic neurons independent of GPI-anchored proteins. Development. 2003;130:5803–5813. [PubMed]
  • Vitaterna MH, King DP, Chang AM, Kornhauser JM, Lowrey PL, et al. Mutagenesis and mapping of a mouse gene, Clock, essential for circadian behavior. Science. 1994;264:719–725. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Vrieling H, Simons JW, van Zeeland AA. Nucleotide sequence determination of point mutations at the mouse HPRT locus using in vitro amplification of HPRT mRNA sequences. Mutat Res. 1988;198:107–113. [PubMed]
  • Walsh CA, Goffinet AM. Potential mechanisms of mutations that affect neuronal migration in man and mouse. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2000;10:270–274. [PubMed]
  • Willnow TE, Hilpert J, Armstrong SA, Rohlmann A, Hammer RE, et al. Defective forebrain development in mice lacking gp330/megalin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:8460–8464. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS Biology are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...